Author Topic: War of the Roses  (Read 14793 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Overdriven

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 828
  • Infamy: 223
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Great Khans
  • Game nicks: GK_Overdriven
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #30 on: August 29, 2011, 05:53:29 pm »
0
Pfff 3rd person is over rated. Even if warbands is shitty, I still only use 1st person and it's not all that bad.

Chivalry looks alright though. The original was a laugh.

Offline Leesin

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1009
  • Infamy: 230
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Leesin
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #31 on: September 04, 2011, 04:19:21 pm »
0
Fucking nice

No third person though?
Also last news post on their page in May?

I played the original which was a modification for HL2 ( Source engine mod ) when it was first released and I played for a very long time, I was also in one of the top clans that was lead by someone who was apart of the dev team, who have now become Torn Banner Studios to make this game.

 If there is one thing I can tell you, these guys will do an awesome job with this game, Age of Chivalry was a fantastic mod but the engine was holding them back, which is why they decided to move to the UDK and make a whole game out of the idea.

The first person view is fine in Age of Chivalry and it really adds to the immersiveness of the combat, I can only imagine it being even more awesome in Chivalry: Medieval Warfare. Playing that game in third person would be boring and isn't the way it's meant to be played. I played AoC again the other day actually, it's still pretty fun although it has a small community now and most of them seem to be annoying idiots lol, but I still enjoyed cutting peoples heads off and watching them roll down a hill, or crushing someones head with a mace.  :lol:

Offline Vibe

  • Vibrator
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2528
  • Infamy: 615
  • cRPG Player Madam White Queen A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #32 on: September 05, 2011, 11:59:19 am »
0
I played the original which was a modification for HL2 ( Source engine mod ) when it was first released and I played for a very long time, I was also in one of the top clans that was lead by someone who was apart of the dev team, who have now become Torn Banner Studios to make this game.

 If there is one thing I can tell you, these guys will do an awesome job with this game, Age of Chivalry was a fantastic mod but the engine was holding them back, which is why they decided to move to the UDK and make a whole game out of the idea.

The first person view is fine in Age of Chivalry and it really adds to the immersiveness of the combat, I can only imagine it being even more awesome in Chivalry: Medieval Warfare. Playing that game in third person would be boring and isn't the way it's meant to be played. I played AoC again the other day actually, it's still pretty fun although it has a small community now and most of them seem to be annoying idiots lol, but I still enjoyed cutting peoples heads off and watching them roll down a hill, or crushing someones head with a mace.  :lol:

Oh, I played Age of Chivalry too (HL2 mod), quite some actually. Was pretty fun, so I guess they have some experience with such stuff. Looking forward to this, either way.

Offline Gorath

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 226
  • Infamy: 168
  • cRPG Player
  • Why the hell did I do anything other than ranged?
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Chaos
  • Game nicks: The threat of physical violence should be present in all things
  • IRC nick: Otherwise we get a swarm of faggot children like the majority of the cRPG/Internet population
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #33 on: September 05, 2011, 12:33:11 pm »
0
Chivalry:Medieval Warfare http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6MxDh0lMSo&feature=related
One interesting developer comment:
 @mrpink260 I can assure you we have played mount and blade and I agree with you that it represents the best quality melee combat currently available in an online experience. But we believe it can be better, and that is why we're making this game.

TeamChivalry

Excited for this game as well.

Directional blocking?  Check
Directional attacks?  Check
DOUBLE TAPPED FUCKING DODGES/LUNGES?!  MOTHERFUCKING CHECK
The ability to fucking crouch?  Check
Fat guys in armor?  Check

All it needs now is the ability to chamber block and feint and we're in godhood status.
And I should be nice or polite to anyone.... why exactly?

Offline Leshma

  • Kickstarter Addict
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1627
  • Infamy: 1349
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • VOTE 2024
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #34 on: September 05, 2011, 06:12:09 pm »
0
They mentioned "slightly more arcadey than M&B". I don't like sound of that.

Offline Teeth

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2550
  • Infamy: 1057
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #35 on: September 05, 2011, 11:37:59 pm »
0
They mentioned "slightly more arcadey than M&B". I don't like sound of that.
I hate the word arcade in any game.

Darkfox his post gave me hope. The video looked allright, a tad bit sluggish. I hope they have big ass zweihanders in this game.

Offline Hisagi

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 30
  • Infamy: 12
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Saints of War
  • Game nicks: SoW_BS_Toby_Moogle_King, sK_BlackHawk
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #36 on: September 12, 2011, 04:16:25 am »
0
If they add guns I won't even bother buying it.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Hisagi's Den of Gewdies

Offline Gorath

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 226
  • Infamy: 168
  • cRPG Player
  • Why the hell did I do anything other than ranged?
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Chaos
  • Game nicks: The threat of physical violence should be present in all things
  • IRC nick: Otherwise we get a swarm of faggot children like the majority of the cRPG/Internet population
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #37 on: September 12, 2011, 07:41:40 am »
0
If they add guns I won't even bother buying it.

....  :rolleyes:
And I should be nice or polite to anyone.... why exactly?

Offline Thucydides

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 129
  • Infamy: 28
  • cRPG Player
  • I shat Uranus
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Thucydides
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #38 on: September 12, 2011, 09:44:15 am »
+2
both of them look like shit, and MnB is arcadey enough, i don't want one on one duels, i want a battle simulator. Waiting for the day when servers can host 1000 people to fight in a 500 vs 500 skirmish.

Offline Gorath

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 226
  • Infamy: 168
  • cRPG Player
  • Why the hell did I do anything other than ranged?
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Chaos
  • Game nicks: The threat of physical violence should be present in all things
  • IRC nick: Otherwise we get a swarm of faggot children like the majority of the cRPG/Internet population
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #39 on: September 14, 2011, 09:09:53 am »
0
Waiting for the day when servers can host 1000 people to fight in a 500 vs 500 skirmish.

What "skirmish"?  There will be 375 ranged, 120 cav and 5 noobs that just installed and thought infantry would be fun on each team.
And I should be nice or polite to anyone.... why exactly?

Offline Classical

  • Permanently Banned
  • **
  • Renown: 133
  • Infamy: 62
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #40 on: September 14, 2011, 10:04:04 am »
0
This game looks fun, whenever it gets released in the year 2020.

Offline Tears of Destiny

  • Naive
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1847
  • Infamy: 870
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Quiet drifting through shallow waters. 死のび
    • View Profile
    • NADS
  • Faction: Black Company
  • IRC nick: Tears
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #41 on: September 14, 2011, 11:26:42 am »
0
What "skirmish"?  There will be 375 ranged, 120 cav and 5 noobs that just installed and thought infantry would be fun on each team.

That still qualifies as a skirmish  :rolleyes:
I'm not normal and I don't pretend so, my approach is pretty much a bomb crescendo.
Death is a fun way to pass the time though, several little bullets moving in staccato.
The terror of my reign will live on in infamy, singing when they die like a dead man's symphony.

Offline bagge

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1056
  • Infamy: 275
  • cRPG Player
  • Duke of Poland
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: bagge
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #42 on: September 14, 2011, 02:46:36 pm »
0
These are the guys that made Lead and Gold.  And that game wasnt very good.

I wouldnt hold my breath for this one

Wut? Lead and Gold was phun
I hope you guys get some sort of sticky balls deseases and smell like my armpits, sorry excusese for nolife fucking cunts you are.

Offline Vibe

  • Vibrator
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2528
  • Infamy: 615
  • cRPG Player Madam White Queen A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #43 on: September 14, 2011, 08:02:29 pm »
0
I found Lead & Gold quite interesting aswell. Was sure worth it's money.

Offline Gorath

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 226
  • Infamy: 168
  • cRPG Player
  • Why the hell did I do anything other than ranged?
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Chaos
  • Game nicks: The threat of physical violence should be present in all things
  • IRC nick: Otherwise we get a swarm of faggot children like the majority of the cRPG/Internet population
Re: War of the Roses
« Reply #44 on: September 15, 2011, 09:21:26 am »
0
That still qualifies as a skirmish  :rolleyes:

That qualifies as an FPS.   :P
And I should be nice or polite to anyone.... why exactly?