Author Topic: The First Crusade  (Read 9530 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Miralay

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 49
  • Infamy: 25
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: The Brigade
  • Game nicks: Tsu, Miralay
Re: The First Crusade
« Reply #45 on: August 04, 2011, 11:28:02 am »
0
Anyway I find that true "Islam" clan and Crusader Knights fighting at the same side against Turks is pretty funny (and a total fail RP) so if defense accepts, I'll fight against this comedy coaliton  :lol:

Offline H4rdn3ssKill3r

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 107
  • Infamy: 46
  • cRPG Player
  • Crummy Wizard
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: naaaaaaaaaah
Re: The First Crusade
« Reply #46 on: August 04, 2011, 11:28:08 am »
0
Need to leaveeeee thiiissss hereeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ez6wfJWVCeI

I was originally putting this one

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCiTDLB11EY&feature=related
f8uasdlöadk blablablababa lbalba
^ Analogy of discussions on forums.

Offline Dede

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 161
  • Infamy: 14
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: The First Crusade
« Reply #47 on: August 04, 2011, 12:08:18 pm »
0
.....

Now roleplay is over.

The Kapikulus planned to attack our village, take our land and attack our armies, we cannot let this go unpunished. So this is an official declaration of war, and we ask our allies to help us in fighting against the enemy.

War was the last thing we wanted, yet it has come to this. Good luck to both factions, may the fights be few, but may they be glorious.

You are still roleplaying the bad guy and your hole thread is Trololol nonsense. If we had planned it, Unriya would not be in your possession right now.
Why should we besiege "Bardaq Castle" if we had the intention to attack an easier target(Acre villages). Does this make any sense?
If we wanted, Of course we could drive out your clan from the desert, but we have kept our agreement and your not.



The truth:
http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,12468.0.html
Quote
Sultan Eren
« Sent to: Timotheusthereal on: July 24, 2011, 22:15:04 »
Well, we already have NAP with Camels and SoA. We'll let you get Unriya and we want nothing. We only want respect for our claims Bardaq Castle, Fishara, Iqybayl, Barriye. We also want a NAP with you if you agree? We only want our claims and nothing more, we'll no harm you. Respect your war with LLJK.

Sultan

Timotheusthereal

« Sent to: Sultan Eren on: July 25, 2011, 19:49:25 »
Agreed!

*shaking hands*


Although we have been fighting against the Bandits as Kapikulu, I must mention that the Bandits were honorable opponents.
Maybe you guys should exchange with Gjnus your clan name. I just hope that other factions now know that they can not trust your Clan.


Offline Miralay

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 49
  • Infamy: 25
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: The Brigade
  • Game nicks: Tsu, Miralay
Re: The First Crusade
« Reply #48 on: August 04, 2011, 12:46:25 pm »
0
You know first crusade was called upon 22nd because they were using glitches during Strat battles (at least that's what Templars said before attacking).

Now Gnjus said this:

LoL youre still on about that ? You sneak attacked me (not that we had any objectives to that, it comes with the life of a bandit) which makes you kinda same as those who "backstabb" you. You got my village thx to a bug and you got your 5000 troops to attack that Castle thx to an ever bigger bug. My "road" has nothing to do with Turks lol, and your silly "claims"....you already know where you can stick 'em but ill tell you once more just in case: up your arse.  :wink:
You're gonna get your asses wiped out of the desert and I'm gonna sit back and enjoy watching it. And in some 2.0 version of strat, bug free and all that, I'm gonna be looking for you miserable "claim" worshipers and show you how its done without any bugs to help me, and I'll do it in the evening between your prayers, not in 5 AM.  :wink:

I'm pretty sure he's telling truth, tbh you don't have enough fiefs/resources to both have a 5k army and gold to equip it. I don't think you're in a position to question another clan's honor, because you've used a huge Strat bug. Any faction can cancel or change any previous deals with you because of this (it's like giving a casus belli to every clan out there). You should have seen this.
« Last Edit: August 04, 2011, 12:49:24 pm by Miralay »

Offline Gnjus

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1831
  • Infamy: 397
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Siktir git, pislik okçu.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Turklings
Re: The First Crusade
« Reply #49 on: August 04, 2011, 12:55:43 pm »
0
Now now, please don't miss-understand my posts: i still think that Sultan Eren, Batal Gazi & Dede are decent chaps, at least they tried to talk like honorable men (and unlike some others they didn't lie to me on TS and change their minds every day), its just that i don't believe in that "claims" business. Also, the spawn point bug is not their fault so i don't blame them for it (sneaky 5 AM attack was dirty too but meh, its a game after all), but if they DID abuse the troops bug (and i was told so) then its their fault but it has nothing to do with Bandits, when that happened we were already long gone from the desert.
The post from OttomanSniper tho was totally uncalled for and thus i replied. After all this I'll still enjoy seeing them wiped.  :wink:
Do you honestly think you have any sort of moral authority, Reyiz? Go genocide some more armenians and deny it ever happened, please, and stay in the middle east.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline 22nd_King_Plazek

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 87
  • Infamy: 57
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: The First Crusade
« Reply #50 on: August 04, 2011, 01:26:31 pm »
0
You know first crusade was called upon 22nd because they were using glitches during Strat battles (at least that's what Templars said before attacking).



Yep, the very same glitches every other faction took advantage in the many sieges that took place previously. Including Templars, and that was battle* because he decided this solely after the siege of Durquba. He claimed I personally was an "evil leader" for allowing it to happen but I was not even present for 90% of that fight as that night my internet decided to break horribly. Funny how he did not object to all the large powerful factions doing the exact same things...

Once again I suggest a "Lets dig up old dirt on the 22nd thread" if so many people wish to discuss these things. They really are not topical you know.

Personally I think he was just clutching at straws for any excuse and thought we would be an easy target for some odd reason.

Offline SirCymro_Crusader

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1095
  • Infamy: 134
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: The First Crusade
« Reply #51 on: August 04, 2011, 01:35:14 pm »
0
.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2023, 07:41:29 pm by SirCymro_Crusader »

Offline Overdriven

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 828
  • Infamy: 223
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Great Khans
  • Game nicks: GK_Overdriven
Re: The First Crusade
« Reply #52 on: August 04, 2011, 02:33:57 pm »
0
Just my view on this:

Acre attacked right after The Turks lost a lot of men in a siege. Seems like you have a crappy excuse with no real backing for it to.

I'm with the The Turks on this one. They deserve recognition for being the first to summon the balls to attack a castle and the fact is they are now having to defend land against a clan who are obviously taking advantage (can't blame you really, I would do the same). Just admit what you are doing rather than try and come out with some very loose reasons for it.

Offline Gnjus

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1831
  • Infamy: 397
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Siktir git, pislik okçu.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Turklings
Re: The First Crusade
« Reply #53 on: August 04, 2011, 03:00:26 pm »
0
They deserve recognition for being the first to summon the balls to attack a castle

More then summoning the balls they deserve some kind of "recognition" for "summoning" those 5500 troops. Much larger clans who didn't even have a single battle vs anyone else then AI villages (and they own more then just 2) still don't have that much (i don't see any Castle attacks happening, maybe the site isn't showing them ?) but the Turks managed to "summon" 'em up with 2 villages and after 2 or 3 battles vs the Bandits and 1 vs AI (where they lost some tickets as well) ? If everything is regular here then we all just need to bow down to them and admire their skills from now on to eternity.  :wink:
Do you honestly think you have any sort of moral authority, Reyiz? Go genocide some more armenians and deny it ever happened, please, and stay in the middle east.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Overdriven

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 828
  • Infamy: 223
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Great Khans
  • Game nicks: GK_Overdriven
Re: The First Crusade
« Reply #54 on: August 04, 2011, 03:02:59 pm »
0
More then summoning the balls they deserve some kind of "recognition" for "summoning" those 5500 troops. Much larger clans who didn't even have a single battle vs anyone else then AI villages (and they own more then just 2) still don't have that much (i don't see any Castle attacks happening, maybe the site isn't showing them ?) but the Turks managed to "summon" 'em up with 2 villages and after 2 or 3 battles vs the Bandits and 1 vs AI (where they lost some tickets as well) ? If everything is regular here then we all just need to bow down to them and admire their skills from now on to eternity.  :wink:

In all fairness GK are recruiting from 2 villages and have roughly the same number of troops (no exact numbers coming  :P ). It's not that difficult if you manage things properly. So yes, I believe they deserve that recognition.

Offline Gnjus

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1831
  • Infamy: 397
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Siktir git, pislik okçu.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Turklings
Re: The First Crusade
« Reply #55 on: August 04, 2011, 03:09:43 pm »
0
In all fairness GK are recruiting from 2 villages and have roughly the same number of troops (no exact numbers coming  :P ). It's not that difficult if you manage things properly. So yes, I believe they deserve that recognition.

Yes, but there is a big difference: after the fights vs Bandits they had like 500 troops left. At that moment GK had like 2000. Then Turks attacked Iqbayl and lost some more men there. Few days later they're on 4k troops. Quite a recruiting skills, i must admit.  :wink:
Do you honestly think you have any sort of moral authority, Reyiz? Go genocide some more armenians and deny it ever happened, please, and stay in the middle east.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Casimir

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1756
  • Infamy: 271
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • The Dashing Templar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Knights Templar
  • Game nicks: Templar_Casimir
  • IRC nick: Casimir
Re: The First Crusade
« Reply #56 on: August 04, 2011, 04:39:11 pm »
0
Yep, the very same glitches every other faction took advantage in the many sieges that took place previously. Including Templars, and that was battle* because he decided this solely after the siege of Durquba. He claimed I personally was an "evil leader" for allowing it to happen but I was not even present for 90% of that fight as that night my internet decided to break horribly. Funny how he did not object to all the large powerful factions doing the exact same things...

Once again I suggest a "Lets dig up old dirt on the 22nd thread" if so many people wish to discuss these things. They really are not topical you know.

Personally I think he was just clutching at straws for any excuse and thought we would be an easy target for some odd reason.

Heritics! Heritics everwhere!
Turtles

Offline Temudjin

  • Beggar
  • Renown: 0
  • Infamy: 1
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Great Khans
  • Game nicks: GK_Temudjin / Woodsman
Re: The First Crusade
« Reply #57 on: August 04, 2011, 06:38:34 pm »
0
I go with what Overdriven said

Offline Argoth

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 232
  • Infamy: 61
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Argoth
Re: The First Crusade
« Reply #58 on: August 05, 2011, 02:28:17 am »
0
Kill them damned varricians (muslims)

Offline The_Angle

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 91
  • Infamy: 56
  • cRPG Player
  • Qaddaffi 4 eva
    • View Profile
Re: The First Crusade
« Reply #59 on: August 05, 2011, 03:47:01 am »
0
I don't want to make any enemies but apparently attacking a castle/town under-prepared means you have balls. Sounds like suicide to me. Again not criticising the Turks, anybody could have made the same mistake.
« Last Edit: August 05, 2011, 03:49:49 am by The_Angle »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

In the land of rape and honey, you prey.