Author Topic: Test Siege Discussion  (Read 2292 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Jarlek

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1173
  • Infamy: 307
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • The walking wiki
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Jarlek_The_Blue, Jarla, Jarlen, Jarler, Jarlec, Jarled OH GOD ALL THESE ALTS
  • IRC nick: Jarlek
Re: Test Siege Discussion
« Reply #15 on: July 27, 2011, 05:35:55 pm »
0
notice how it says test siege. noone attacked a castle, it was a mock battle to test stuff out for chadz that he gave people troops and set it to a map. It was just a big QA test for him.
And this was something I should have understood from a simple "test siege"? What I thought was that someone attacked a castle in strat to check out how it works. No need to be so hostile.
This game isn't about being skillful as much as its about saying things in general chat that enrage people who then go to murder you but in their rage they make dumb mistakes which gets them killed.
In memory of Jarlek_zeh_Blue, ruler of Ilvia

Offline Elerion

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 132
  • Infamy: 8
  • cRPG Player
  • Pink Team
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fallen Brigade
  • Game nicks: Fallen_Elerion
  • IRC nick: Elerion
Re: Test Siege Discussion
« Reply #16 on: July 27, 2011, 05:43:21 pm »
0
How was he hostile?

Offline Remy

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 68
  • Infamy: 8
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Remy_the_Fox
  • IRC nick: Remy
Re: Test Siege Discussion
« Reply #17 on: July 27, 2011, 05:47:19 pm »
0
He did not include enough smiley faces...
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Fox, Horse Archer, Tker of Chagan.

Offline Panoply

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 113
  • Infamy: 10
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Aristeia, Panoply, Pistachio
Re: Test Siege Discussion
« Reply #18 on: July 27, 2011, 05:51:18 pm »
0
Not sure how badly hills affected siege towers, but in real life, siege towers were also pretty useless on hills.

Offline PhantomZero

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 384
  • Infamy: 53
  • cRPG Player
  • I'm going to need you playing at 6AM on Saturday..
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BIRD CLAN
  • Game nicks: POSTMASTER_PHANTOM0_OF_BIRD
  • IRC nick: PhantomZero
Re: Test Siege Discussion
« Reply #19 on: July 27, 2011, 06:11:04 pm »
+1
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


It would have been different if chadz hadn't set up the siege event and map for the purpose of testing the siege equipment   :P

This was definitely a "ladder" castle and not a tower one.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline legionarei

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 3
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: LLJK
  • Game nicks: LLJK_legionarei
Re: Test Siege Discussion
« Reply #20 on: July 27, 2011, 08:05:59 pm »
0
Avant-garde modern art siege towers forever.

I know this is probably way beyond the ability of the code but it would be really nice to have say - an item that gave ONE PERSON the ability to operate equipment. I was kinda busy soaking up arrows and trying to keep Gaga from being killed (horribly) but one of the big problems was everyone thinking they were "helping" and messing with the equipment. If battle commanders could buy a certain amount of the control items and assign them to siege commanders it might help with the random team member messing around with the stuff.

This may have been more of an issue since both sides recruited anyone they could get and wouldn't happen in a more organized army, but it might still be helpful to think about.

Offline Warcat

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 396
  • Infamy: 40
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Mappers Guild
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fallen Brigade
  • Game nicks: Fallen_Warcat_ Village_Elder Merchant_of_Tulga Tavern_Keeper Guild_Master Ramun_The_Slave_Trader
Re: Test Siege Discussion
« Reply #21 on: July 27, 2011, 08:27:49 pm »
0
Yeah, the issue with many people operating is purely an organization issue. I don't think anything needs to be made to fix that.
In memory of Fallen_Warcat_, member of Fallen Brigade, ruler of Zagush
Tavern_Keeper #1 NA shielder
Strategus City Improvement Project

Offline dodnet

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 595
  • Infamy: 149
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Wolpertinger
  • Game nicks: DoD, DoD_Wolper
Re: Test Siege Discussion
« Reply #22 on: July 27, 2011, 08:38:24 pm »
0
The logic of war seems to be that if a belligerent can fight he will fight.

(click to show/hide)