Author Topic: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232  (Read 28952 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline HatsuneMiku

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 2
  • Infamy: 5
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: AEF_HatsuneMiku
Re: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232
« Reply #15 on: July 12, 2011, 11:56:02 am »
-2
-40 Rotation limit (lol uninstalled)

Offline Bobthehero

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 515
  • Infamy: 195
  • cRPG Player
  • Grandmaster Ultimate God Of Swashbucklin'
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Bridgeburners
  • Game nicks: Bobthehero_Whals and I am totally not all the Not_Bobthehero alts ever.
  • IRC nick: Buff Swashbuckling
Re: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232
« Reply #16 on: July 12, 2011, 11:56:35 am »
0
Plate armor as efficient a wet cardboard and heavy as a planet or 3.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
The Narwhals, dedicated swashbuckler part of FCC


Stabbing is my speciality and one hitting people, my art

Offline Matey

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1327
  • Infamy: 372
  • cRPG Player
  • A Pirate
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Matey_BRD
Re: [Feedback] What's wrong with 0.232
« Reply #17 on: July 12, 2011, 11:59:28 am »
+1
+Cav seems a lot more reasonable now
+Throwing no longer only for people who can pick up random weps and fight with 1wpf
+ Archer trajectories are a bit more realistic
+ random chadz text that gives multi
+ I dont glance all the damn time with 4PS
- I dont hit very hard with 4PS
- Archers maybe need a bit more damage
- game still favours STR builds. Athletics needs some love
- Bec is still broken
- Elite Scimitar still super fast with super reach and hits hard
- Horses might become a big problem again once all the current throwers go do something else, unless archers get boosted.
- still get screwed over when heirlooming light armour.
- still no sexy orange or heraldic gambeson
- still no pirate gear

despite all the -s im pretty happy with the patch.

Offline gazda

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 483
  • Infamy: 124
  • cRPG Player
  • Its almost harvesting season.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Saracens
  • Game nicks: Gazda_the_Swine
  • IRC nick: gazda
Re: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232
« Reply #18 on: July 12, 2011, 11:59:37 am »
0
-upkeep increase
+dtv
+general balance of all classes
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline okiN

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 924
  • Infamy: 129
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232
« Reply #19 on: July 12, 2011, 12:00:46 pm »
-1
Plate armor as efficient a wet cardboard and heavy as a planet or 3.

You should be more clear, is that a plus or a minus?
Don't.

Offline Thovex

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 851
  • Infamy: 210
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vanguard
  • Game nicks: Thovex
Re: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232
« Reply #20 on: July 12, 2011, 12:02:01 pm »
0
+ Better performance.
+ Skip the Fun for everyone, one char.
+ DTV mode much beter.

- 40° Rotation limit for lancer, it's horrible, I mean come on I can't even kill a tincan with a scythe on horse right now.
- buffs and nerfs, it's fine the way it was.
« Last Edit: July 12, 2011, 12:11:14 pm by Thovex »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Bobthehero

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 515
  • Infamy: 195
  • cRPG Player
  • Grandmaster Ultimate God Of Swashbucklin'
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Bridgeburners
  • Game nicks: Bobthehero_Whals and I am totally not all the Not_Bobthehero alts ever.
  • IRC nick: Buff Swashbuckling
Re: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232
« Reply #21 on: July 12, 2011, 12:02:45 pm »
0
You should be more clear, is that a plus or a minus?

Look at the tone, its clearly a -
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
The Narwhals, dedicated swashbuckler part of FCC


Stabbing is my speciality and one hitting people, my art

Offline Arrowblood

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 508
  • Infamy: 112
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: The Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Arrowblood
Re: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232
« Reply #22 on: July 12, 2011, 12:03:32 pm »
0
- longbow shotspeed (mw shotspeed is lower than the little hunting xbow)

Offline indigocylinder

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 38
  • Infamy: 13
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232
« Reply #23 on: July 12, 2011, 12:06:35 pm »
+1
+ scythe was buffed
- scythe does not yet have crushthrough/knockdown/bonus against shield.

Offline slothscott

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 38
  • Infamy: 11
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: AEF_BigBird
Re: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232
« Reply #24 on: July 12, 2011, 12:08:02 pm »
0
+ scythe buff
« Last Edit: July 12, 2011, 03:37:09 pm by slothscott »

Offline Tzar

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 996
  • Infamy: 564
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Byzantium
  • Game nicks: Byzantium_TzarOfRushYa
  • IRC nick: TZAR
Re: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232
« Reply #25 on: July 12, 2011, 12:08:47 pm »
0
- upkeep

+ overall balance

Slry chadz the upkeep is retarded plz revert it back to pre patch

Removed idiotic color-size -spam. -Vargas
« Last Edit: July 12, 2011, 12:46:13 pm by Vargas »
I've never played a server where people split up as much or as often as on EU1.  No wonder range is having a field day.

Offline SkyrayFox

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 19
  • Infamy: 4
  • cRPG Player
  • Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!
    • View Profile
  • IRC nick: SkyrayFox
Re: [Feedback] What's wrong with 0.232
« Reply #26 on: July 12, 2011, 12:11:39 pm »
0
+ Game got more skill based
+ Cavalry and archery changes
+ Throwing is now a viable option
+ Upkeep increase
+ Website security
- New DTV oversimplified (could be much better with some improvements)
- Strategus...

Offline Corrado_Decimo

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 109
  • Infamy: 55
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Grey Order
  • Game nicks: Corrado_the_Grey, Bodyguard_the_Grey, Sniper_IV_the_Grey, Ston3rh, Hopleet
Re: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232
« Reply #27 on: July 12, 2011, 12:12:46 pm »
0
- 40° lance thrust on horse is too narrow.. maybe 60-70° will be better
- polearms untouched
- 2h dps (damage/speed) nerfd every big patch. only reason 2h exists is a bit more viable crushthru compared to polearms
- archer changes. arrow speed too low. warbow (rus bow) useless compared to a more viable strongbow.
+ throwing buff
+ performance polish (well i haven't noticed it... the 6970 handle the engine at 120fps really with low gpu usage. but some friends report better fps)
+ security improvements (best part of the patch)

Offline Bezlikiy

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 2
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
  • My nick translated as "faceless" :)
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Bezlikiy_The_Pillager
Re: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232
« Reply #28 on: July 12, 2011, 12:22:46 pm »
+1
- archers nerf (small speed of arrows)
- lancing nerf

+ HA nerf
+ buff Throwing Weapons
+ returning old face meshes
+ new bow Yumi
« Last Edit: July 12, 2011, 01:02:42 pm by Bezlikiy »

Offline Punisher

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 127
  • Infamy: 17
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Fallen_Punisher
Re: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232
« Reply #29 on: July 12, 2011, 12:24:48 pm »
0
+skip the fun for everyone
+new DTV
+one account for all characters
+better performance due to LOD textures and old faces
+throwing is viable again
+lancers are now back in line with the other cav
+new archer trajectory is more realistic
+all the minor balancing (-1 speed/-1 damage for some weapons, 2 slots for shields over 8 weight, etc)

Not decided yet about the new armor calculation, have to test it more but it feels like soak was nerfed a bit too much, glancing seems to be completely gone, even with 0 ps 0 wpf against 60+ armor target.