Author Topic: Biased admins?  (Read 2872 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Sharpe

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 619
  • Infamy: 71
  • cRPG Player
  • I like Sheep.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Wales
  • Game nicks: Sharpe, Llewllyn
Re: Biased admins?
« Reply #30 on: June 22, 2015, 12:57:04 pm »
+3
Already addressed that. He had been leeching for many rounds at max XP reward, plenty of levels to pick up a weapon and be useful. Fuck off if you're just going to disagree with me without even looking at the situation objectively, retard.

Also, Jona - great job throwing around irrelevant quotes to draw away attention from your shitty admining. This community gets what it pays for by allowing shit like this to slide.

"wahh stop being so negative!!! heres a quote 'if ur negative criticism UR DUM' hah gott'eem!!!! (+420 forum upvotes)"

Here's an idea: Stop giving players things to be negative about, and do your fucking job right. I tried real hard to think up something positive about the cRPG admins, but I can't come up with anything except for Nashringa - at least he pays for the ability to abuse his powers by working on the game in some technical way.

Regardless of all forum dickriders, ad hominems, and "dank memes", cRPG admins are definitely biased. Fine, be biased - it's only human. But have the guts to do your job properly anyways.

Fuck, let's just make you an admin, but then you would continue bitching about how you're the only righteous admin doing their job, and since you would be cRPG admin you would ultimately be biased.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


“I like the cover," he said. "Don't Panic. It's the first helpful or intelligible thing anybody's said to me all day.”

Offline Rando

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 593
  • Infamy: 183
  • cRPG Player
  • Chairman of the Refuge Against Domestic Violence.
    • View Profile
Re: Biased admins?
« Reply #31 on: June 22, 2015, 01:22:26 pm »
-2
Fuck, let's just make you an admin, but then you would continue bitching about how you're the only righteous admin doing their job, and since you would be cRPG admin you would ultimately be biased.

Tell us more, wise fortune teller Sharpe.
Women cannot be autistic, because that implies otherwise well functioning brain to be impaired in some way. We know that women posses no such thing.

Offline Voncrow

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 474
  • Infamy: 108
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
  • No honour in retreat
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Sovereign Kingdom of Thirdarrel
  • Game nicks: Voncrow, Bane, Velcrow
Re: Biased admins?
« Reply #32 on: June 22, 2015, 01:23:39 pm »
0
This community gets what it pays for by allowing shit like this to slide.
This is true.
'The only people who might be put off M:BG by the current state of cRPG would be cRPG players, and we don't want that kind of scum in M:BG anyway.' - Heskey

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Sharpe

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 619
  • Infamy: 71
  • cRPG Player
  • I like Sheep.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Wales
  • Game nicks: Sharpe, Llewllyn
Re: Biased admins?
« Reply #33 on: June 22, 2015, 02:06:52 pm »
+3
Tell us more, wise fortune teller Sharpe.

You will transform from a 12 year old making a wish, into a 30 year old; life will be hard but through perseverance you can make it.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


“I like the cover," he said. "Don't Panic. It's the first helpful or intelligible thing anybody's said to me all day.”

Offline gallonigher

  • Game Admin (trial)
  • ****
  • Renown: 420
  • Infamy: 60
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
  • Game nicks: Gallonigher
Re: Biased admins?
« Reply #34 on: June 22, 2015, 08:18:42 pm »
+3
Jona is doing absolutely fine; no better or worse than a dozen admins that came before him.  Why some of you choose to sit there stewing like idiots angry over nothing, I'll never know;  don't care.  It is what it is.  Now actually contribute to this community by building a bridge and getting the fuck over it.



Offline Jona

  • Balancer
  • *
  • Renown: 1372
  • Infamy: 376
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
  • OG Agi Whore
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Hounds of Chulainn
  • Game nicks: Jona, Siegafried
Re: Biased admins?
« Reply #35 on: June 22, 2015, 09:09:06 pm »
-1
Also, Jona - great job throwing around irrelevant quotes to draw away attention from your shitty admining.

I see no need to continue responding to you since you don't care to even read what I write. See this explanation:

Right, I forgot about that. Rostam_of_Mithrim had recently retired and was kinda just chilling as a level 1 peasant while we were up against the latter waves of DTV, and as a result had a KDR of 0-4 or something. A select few people were saying he was leeching and yet every time I looked he was active and jumping round inside the fence (where someone should be if they can't do much else to contribute). I was getting flack from good ole Rando since Rostam was "in my strat faction and I was going too easy one him." A) He's not in my strat faction, as if that matters, and B) he wasn't deserving of any punishment, in my eyes. That is when I told Rando to take up the issue with any other admins in the server to see if it was "my bias" or simply the fact that no rules were being broken that was the reason he hadn't be booted yet.

Which came before this tirade:

You purposefully ignored my complaints about Rostam_of_Mithrim leeching, because he's a part of your alliance.

You successfully managed to tell me to "ask another admin" when I had no idea there was even another admin in the server, because the admins smurf far too fucking much.

1. He is in your strat faction, Wardens of the North. Don't give me some bullshit about how "durrr we split up ;^)" You're still closely allied, nothing has changed.
2. He was dicking around inside the fence doing absolutely nothing. After leeching over 4 rounds of max bonus from DTV, he could've easily grabbed a weapon and helped, but chose not to. Probably because he knew you wouldn't touch him.

I don't know why I bother continuing with this complaint, it's been proven time and time again that admins have absolutely no accountability for their actions in this mod. I don't feel like giving up, however.

It's almost like I'm psychic and had an answer for all your accusations before you even typed them up, or you're just a broken record repeating the same things over and over thinking that you've won some e-argument by continually getting the last word. Either way, it's clear that there is no further use explaining myself to an illiterate. If you can come up with something new, that isn't completely made up, then maybe I will bother to come back here and make another reply.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


"I'll have my lance aimed at Jona's knees and he'll jump up, run up my lance and kill me." -Dalfador

Offline Bronto

  • Head NA admin
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1339
  • Infamy: 268
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Biased admins?
« Reply #36 on: June 22, 2015, 10:33:43 pm »
+4
I'm biased against people who are biased. This entire thread is biased. Admins biased against players, players biased against admins. I think we should just remove all admins and players and just be able to log in and watch bots fight in spectator mode. Then we should make threads about how bot 1 is so biased against bot 2. Pick sides and then bring bot strategus into the argument. Biased bot clan 1 just totally item bombed biased bot clan 2's village and the biased bot admin didn't even do anything. Look at bot 2 leeching...he won't get banned because the admin is bot 22 and they both have 2 in their names. fucking biased. This biased action has to stop. Quit being biased.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Rando

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 593
  • Infamy: 183
  • cRPG Player
  • Chairman of the Refuge Against Domestic Violence.
    • View Profile
Re: Biased admins?
« Reply #37 on: June 22, 2015, 11:04:52 pm »
-3
I see no need to continue responding to you since you don't care to even read what I write. See this explanation:

Which came before this tirade:

It's almost like I'm psychic and had an answer for all your accusations before you even typed them up, or you're just a broken record repeating the same things over and over thinking that you've won some e-argument by continually getting the last word. Either way, it's clear that there is no further use explaining myself to an illiterate. If you can come up with something new, that isn't completely made up, then maybe I will bother to come back here and make another reply.

Right, because being 0-4 and jumping around in a fence while making no attempt to help your team isn't being a leech. You didn't fucking explain anything, in my eyes you only spewed some diarrhea at me. Diarrhea that I will continue to ignore, because in my eyes, you should've taken action. "I didn't think he was doing anything wrong!" isn't good enough when it was plainly obvious to multiple people that he was.

I disagree with the way you handled the situation, that's the whole point of this. You're right, why do you bother responding to me? Just fuck off and let whoever keeps an eye over the admins make his decision. The sooner whoever that is comes in and drops a knowledge bomb on us all, the sooner I can abandon this thread and stop talking to all of you.
« Last Edit: June 22, 2015, 11:08:52 pm by RandoHg »
Women cannot be autistic, because that implies otherwise well functioning brain to be impaired in some way. We know that women posses no such thing.

Offline Gurnisson

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1750
  • Infamy: 362
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen
  • Game nicks: SeaRaider_Gurnisson
Re: Biased admins?
« Reply #38 on: June 23, 2015, 12:05:33 am »
+3
How helpful can you be to your team at that low level though? The best way to help is to stay alive to not lower the rewards, while avoid being afk as that's certainly leeching.

You also ask why he responds to you. You quote his posts, telling him how he's wrong. Why shouldn't he front his own views of the situation?
I voted Gurnisson cause of his fucking bendy pike, I swear noone can roflcopter stab like he can.

Offline gallonigher

  • Game Admin (trial)
  • ****
  • Renown: 420
  • Infamy: 60
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
  • Game nicks: Gallonigher
Re: Biased admins?
« Reply #39 on: June 23, 2015, 12:08:05 am »
+2
you wouldn't see the point if it stabbed you in the eye

Offline Bronto

  • Head NA admin
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1339
  • Infamy: 268
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Biased admins?
« Reply #40 on: June 23, 2015, 12:53:05 am »
+4
you wouldn't see the point if it stabbed you in the eye

It's randohg so you'd have to stab both his eyes. He'd use the eye you weren't stabbing to see the point and then make a thread about how you missed both eyes.

Offline mcdeath

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 797
  • Infamy: 349
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Biased admins?
« Reply #41 on: June 23, 2015, 01:16:19 am »
+2
(click to show/hide)


visitors can't see pics , please register or login
McDeath: This guy doesn't shut his lip, but he's one of the funniest players in-game.

Offline Schoi

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 578
  • Infamy: 114
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: small weiner
  • Game nicks: Skoi, Schoi, jus_the_tip_bby_feel_rlygud
Re: Biased admins?
« Reply #42 on: June 23, 2015, 07:19:09 am »
0
Let's again get back to the main points, a full geared player on a rouncey holding both a lance, and a shield was afk leeching multiple times. That is proof he is not low level. A low level should not go afk, instead they should use a ballista, which he did not.

RandoHg? More like RetardHg amirite!

I don't need autism like this, try club penguin if you continue to make horrible memes. My autism is already enough for this thread. But seriously, whether someone has a bad ban record, or they do not. You should look at each player equally, if I tk someone, nobody gives a shit, if I leech, nobody gives a shit. If Saint tk's Jona, Jona gets mad and rage bans. If poophammer is a troll and tw's as an admin, nobody gives a shit. Tristan asked for an admin to deal with the original problem to avoid any biased punishment. Obviously, the wrong admin took the role.

I'm locking the topic, there is no need to continue shit posting in this mod if nobody and nothing will do shit. What's truly sad is Garry's Mod has admins under the age of 13 that better respond to events like this, and post like mature adults.
Best quote
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Well fact is, NA players are mostly casual normies not knowing mechanics & who would have no chance against competitive EU players on the same ping.