EU cant XP strat battle (cept DRZ)

[Osiris]

If you want to accomplish something in strat you have to put a lot of work in there, especially as a big faction. But yeah, why would Mercs know that. 

dar isnt a merc? not that Coalition actually accomplished anything last strat or much before 

[Fips]

dar isnt a merc? not that Coalition actually accomplished anything last strat or much before 

You really want to get into the discussion of who accomplished more?^^

[BASNAK]

dar isnt a merc? not that Coalition actually accomplished anything last strat or much before 

He used to be. God knows what clan that clanhopper belongs to now 

[darmaster]

Hey hey HEY HEY LET'S CALM OUR TITTIES NOW OK?

[BASNAK]

Hey hey HEY HEY LET'S CALM OUR TITTIES NOW OK?

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

[Osiris]

You really want to get into the discussion of who accomplished more?^^

didn't say who did more. mercs were crap inactive and died. you were dull inactive then rage quit

(click to show/hide)

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

[Leshma]

Actually, necro-ing this now is a very good idea. Because if strat goes the usual way, XP battles will be only thing we'll do and making them better will be high priority.

[Leshma]

Just for the record, I've said that DRZ does good XP battles because they indeed give epic XP. But there are not fun, unless someone find 50 vs 50 spamberge fights in full plate on a restricted area, fun. NA XP battles give ton of XP and are fun to play at the same time, anyone who played both at the end of last Strategus can testify this.

[Riddaren]

First of all, why should you get more XP from playing strategus battles than normal battles on EU_1 for example?
Secondly, you already get a lot more from playing strategus, so why complain?