Cavalry

[Torwald]

I can't understand how useless cavalry is there taking lot of damage and get dismounted easily! Do you agree?
 

[IR_Kuoin]

Well, horses have a lot more advantages than disadvantages, horses are animals not tanks, unless you go Elephant, and since legs do more damage, you just have to play careful and backstab like most cavs do

[Tyr_]

Personally i think that the only horse that could use some more hp or armor to resist arrows is the War Horse. All horses up to the Eastern warhorses easily get killed by 3-4 shots from a decent range (or 1 shot by one of mendros Jarids). But considering they are completely unarmored its fine imo.
Barbed & padded can take a few more shots which is nice, however the war horse dies way to fast considering it has a mail armor.

Still, as much as i would appreciate a buff for all cav - lobbying for my own class - i cannot really agree since this scene pretty much sums up my gameplay on eu1 whenever i feel like equipping my plate armor & mamluk pony (i call him stompy)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=S0I96BK_lMw#t=148

[Penitent]

Cav should be more effective, imo.  I play a shielder, so I am the prey of cav.  Still, I think horses should be more resilient to melee attacks.