Author Topic: Ban Deserter_Kutluhan  (Read 900 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lt_Anders

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1049
  • Infamy: 651
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Man, I still play this shit?
    • View Profile
    • Drowtales
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Anders_Astralis
Ban Deserter_Kutluhan
« on: June 11, 2013, 05:40:58 pm »
IN an NA strat battle, he purposfully and intentionally wasted siege gear, as can be attested by several people. He was banned for 5 days for griefing an NA strat battle, yet he suffers no penalty on EU. Please give him an approriate punishment so that he learns not to do this.

(click to show/hide)
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline dynamike

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1212
  • Infamy: 187
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Let's be friends again?
    • View Profile
    • The Remnants Clan Website
  • Faction: Stratia
  • Game nicks: Remnant_dynamike
Re: Ban Deserter_Kutluhan
« Reply #1 on: June 11, 2013, 07:40:51 pm »
This man speaketh true! Kutluhan spawned with multiple construction sites, dumped them just in front of our spawn and cycled them to weapon rack to make them useless. This had a big effect on the outcome of the battle since we ran out of construction sites due to his griefing.

This is an EU player, a NA ban does not do him any harm. Please extend the ban to EU servers.
For while the fire in the heart of a single Remnant still burns... can Stratia truly have fallen?

Offline FleetFox

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 711
  • Infamy: 72
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Fox Shox Rox
    • View Profile
  • Faction: The Norsemen
  • Game nicks: Norse_Torr and FleetFox
Re: Ban Deserter_Kutluhan
« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2013, 08:49:05 pm »
This isn't good to see. I will notify our clan leader about this, I apologise on behalf of our clan member Kutluhan.
"Its better to die on your feet than to live on your knees."
― Emiliano Zapata

Offline Canary

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 826
  • Infamy: 202
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: CHAOS
Re: Ban Deserter_Kutluhan
« Reply #3 on: June 12, 2013, 01:26:53 am »
His ban was only for an hour and a half, actually, and it was just to remove him from the duration of the battle.

Offline Lt_Anders

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1049
  • Infamy: 651
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Man, I still play this shit?
    • View Profile
    • Drowtales
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Anders_Astralis
Re: Ban Deserter_Kutluhan
« Reply #4 on: June 12, 2013, 01:33:47 am »
Right. But it was in response to griefing and wasting siege equipment.

Thanks for that Info and clarification canary.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Kutluhan

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 51
  • Infamy: 25
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Byzantium, Vanguard
  • Game nicks: Kistray
Re: Ban Deserter_Kutluhan
« Reply #5 on: June 12, 2013, 11:24:10 am »
sorry all. i didint know this :(

Offline dynamike

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1212
  • Infamy: 187
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Let's be friends again?
    • View Profile
    • The Remnants Clan Website
  • Faction: Stratia
  • Game nicks: Remnant_dynamike
Re: Ban Deserter_Kutluhan
« Reply #6 on: June 14, 2013, 11:22:58 pm »
Sooo, any admin gonna pick up and handle this one please?

Sorry, not buying that he "did not know" that it was wrong to intentionally sabotage a battle. So the ban request still stands.
For while the fire in the heart of a single Remnant still burns... can Stratia truly have fallen?

Offline Zlisch_The_Butcher

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1272
  • Infamy: 971
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Faction: Frisian Church of Mork The Goat God
  • Game nicks: Zlisch
  • IRC nick: IRC nick: Tears
Re: Ban Deserter_Kutluhan
« Reply #7 on: June 14, 2013, 11:38:36 pm »
Despite his relatively new forum/account he has been playing for a long time, can't possibly not know fucking up a siege isn't ok, this is his old account http://forum.meleegaming.com/index.php?action=profile;u=18602 , he got permad banned for autoblocking.
1H stab is the fastest, strongest and longest 1H animation. There's no reason NOT to use it in all instances. I don't know if it's OP, but it's boring. 1H used to be fun because you had a fast (left), long (right) and the most devastating attack (stab) and had to choose the best attack for each occasion.