I wonder where I got that impression?
Oh that's right you gave me the impression when you insulted me!
So you see, there are three different things, one called the past, one called the present and the last one called the future. You started going apeshit in the past, which lead me to insult you after that. Now you are arguing that your motivation was something that actually happened in the then-future. That is much interesting, as causality is most often considered not to go back in time. Even more interesting, this is a prerequisite cycle, as I wouldn't have insulted you if you didn't fall back to ad hominem in the first place.
Asking Kafein's opinion about the c-rpg marketplace is like asking Larry Page's opinion about "Bing!" or inviting whoever made War of the Roses to critique C-RPG. In America it is entirely civil to point out another's bias in a matter. Senators do not write laws which would profit themselves. Judges do not decide cases which impact their assets. I am sorry if this is not the case in your culture but I will not apologize if the sensibilities of freedom offend you. So when Kafein says he can transcend bias, I question whether he is really a supremely altruistic and intelligent person descending from his pedestal of reason; or if he is reacting to a suggestion which would significantly and materially impact him.
Except you are mixing opinions and arguments. The list of actual trades being made isn't an opinion, it is a fact. You are failing to get pretty basic rethoric stuff right (and no it doesn't depend on freedom, which as we all know only exists in America).
To describe the situation, let me give you an imaginary example : suppose you debate with Pepsi PR personel which soft is the best between Pepsi and Coca Cola. They are
biased as hell. Yet if they
prove you that each Coca Cola bottle contains harmful quantities of radioactive strontium, if you say their argument is null because they are biaised, you are stupid. As a matter of fact, when discussing actual arguments bias doesn't matter, unlike with pseudo-arguments and opinions.
Basically what you are doing is taking every criticism as opinion. What about you then ? It is
your suggestion, of course you want it to be right ! Your opinions are biaised too !
Also just so you know, I have to pay more than 100k gold (and regularly more than 200k) for this booth every two weeks to keep it. Much unlike the "undeserved and unfair advantage" you make it out to be. I even ended up in loss twice because the booth price was very high at those moments. In fact, I would love being able to trade properly without this booth and only having to pay a 1% tax.
I'm not criticizing your suggestion for personal reasons, I'm showing you it is bad.
