Author Topic: Was it just two handers that were the 'balancers' or what?  (Read 865 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline gdijim

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 18
  • Infamy: 14
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Was it just two handers that were the 'balancers' or what?
« on: March 20, 2013, 05:53:03 am »
+1
I have to say - Have a good one guys.  I was already on my way out, but the recent changes are just a bit too much.

Go fuck yourselves!

Release_Arrows.

Offline Armycook_of_KSantiago

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 188
  • Infamy: 15
  • cRPG Player
  • No mercy! No retreat! No remorse!
    • View Profile
Re: Was it just two handers that were the 'balancers' or what?
« Reply #1 on: March 20, 2013, 06:23:26 am »
+1
Wait arrowz plz dont go we love u
go str crutch polearm next gen and u will stay   :D
Dinner is served!
(click to show/hide)

Offline Zaren

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 162
  • Infamy: 64
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Zaren_Astralis
  • IRC nick: Zaren
Re: Was it just two handers that were the 'balancers' or what?
« Reply #2 on: March 20, 2013, 06:27:21 am »
+1
Maybe you just need a break? I took a couple months off after getting tired of crpg drama and now im back and ready to throw my life away to this game again.

Offline Kuujis

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 298
  • Infamy: 79
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Midreek_HRE
Re: Was it just two handers that were the 'balancers' or what?
« Reply #3 on: March 20, 2013, 07:24:44 am »
0
MMm.... Can i have your stuff? :rolleyes:

Offline LordRichrich

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 297
  • Infamy: 115
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Was it just two handers that were the 'balancers' or what?
« Reply #4 on: March 20, 2013, 07:35:39 am »
0
I'd look after any looms for you :)

And just take a break, things aren't as bad as they seem :) I took a month off, came back and enjoyed the hell outta it!

Offline Prpavi

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1525
  • Infamy: 402
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • 私 わ 変態 です
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Prpavi, Prpafeee
Re: Was it just two handers that were the 'balancers' or what?
« Reply #5 on: March 20, 2013, 08:08:12 am »
0
I have to say - Have a good one guys.  I was already on my way out, but the recent changes are just a bit too much.

Go fuck yourselves!

Release_Arrows.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
And now he can't play because of "common sense" and he doesn't understand how this common sense works
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Leesin

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1009
  • Infamy: 230
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Leesin
Re: Was it just two handers that were the 'balancers' or what?
« Reply #6 on: March 20, 2013, 12:04:46 pm »
+1
Bye.

Offline Teeth

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2550
  • Infamy: 1057
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Was it just two handers that were the 'balancers' or what?
« Reply #7 on: March 20, 2013, 12:07:31 pm »
0
2h too hard, buff 2h.

Offline Chris_the_Animal

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 663
  • Infamy: 183
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Chris
Re: Was it just two handers that were the 'balancers' or what?
« Reply #8 on: March 20, 2013, 12:21:10 pm »
0
gimme loomz?
Bros never die!

Offline Macropus

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1668
  • Infamy: 296
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Macropus
Re: Was it just two handers that were the 'balancers' or what?
« Reply #9 on: March 20, 2013, 12:22:39 pm »
0
Wasn't it polearms that got buffed?  :rolleyes:

Offline cmp

  • M:BG Developer
  • Supreme Overlord
  • *******
  • Renown: 2052
  • Infamy: 569
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • IRC nick: cmp
Re: Was it just two handers that were the 'balancers' or what?
« Reply #10 on: March 20, 2013, 12:54:05 pm »
+8
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Bye.