People are sick of the map rotation on eu1.

[oerput]

problem is this; we are getting 3-4 hilly ranged maps in row and after that 3-4 flat cav maps in a row again. if we-the inf- are lucky we can get some well balanced village maps after that and do some decent melee without getting shot from every angle or couched. what we need is some good old village maps and more variety in map rotation. putting similar maps in a row is always a big "fuck u" to certain classes.

[Miwiw]

No, not Sandibusch! Its awful, damn lust...

Those other maps we play quite often though, except for Ruined Fort. However there's a new version of Ruined Fort on IG BG which is kinda awful though... prefering the old native maps over that.

Nord Town and Ruins are played kinda often, and thats good.

[Osiris]

are you sure miwiw? i don't think frosty battle has ever seen a public crpg server, i think ruined fort was removed years ago and i rarely if ever see ruins anymore and hey i like sandi it makes me think im crusading some peasant village )

[Miwiw]

I play ruins now and then on EU1, same for Nord Town or Port Assault. I'm kinda sad about no more Ruined Fort though...

I believe I saw Frosty battle at least once on crpg... or thats probably me who played too much on IG BG before and during my warband time.

[Osiris]

some maps were removed because they didnt work with the good 120 players eu1 used to have all the time. now its usually 50-80 they should be fine

[bagge]

Remove all those retarded mount everest maps for starters. Then you can add more native maps

[Chagan_Arslan]

A lot of people develop maps and weapons but they are rarely implemented.

its too time consuming for devs to add them