Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!

[Spanish]

Lol I've been accidentally typing FFC all day and changing it back to FCC before posting and that time I think I changed the FCC to FFC in any case I can't type on my phone.

Secondly Valdian said it and sorry Valdian you say a lot of things that don't actually end up being what us Hosps be doin so until I get on tonight idk if that's even our stance.

Besides we should be douches it's our god given right to step on smaller people and get rid of their filthy pagan ways. Because who's stopping us right now! Oh noes we getting a trolled on the forums! Hahaha hopefully things get interesting soon with all this douchebaggery we be doin.

[Devestater]

lol... drama this early? really?

[Kreczor]

lol... drama this early? really?

Are you really that surprised? All strat is really is a way for people to get at each others throats. The real game is seeing how you can play the pieces in the puzzle.

[CrazyCracka420]

One more little thing, Valdian, the Chevaliers refuted their claims to Samarra, why must you dastardly Hospitallers go messing around with the valiant Heroes of Semen, (I prefer to pronounce it as you would Yemen) while they are just consolidating their first claims? I do not wish to impede upon the Knights Hospitaller's actions, but this seems as though some blatantly aggressive action.

It's not blatantly aggressive.  There is still an owner of the castle.  He was our vassal as Papal Guard, and choose to join our faction and give us the castle.  We planned on giving it to the Chevaliers.  I told Inglorious we were trying to work out a diplomatic solution to the castle with hero_party.  As it stands, our vassal controlled the castle, and we intend to keep it that way until a deal is reached.  Seems pretty easy for all parties to comprehend except for forum posters.