Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Ban request on Lukker  (Read 543 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Fuma Kotaro

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 839
  • Infamy: 220
  • cRPG Player
  • I'm Fubadubbaduma
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Lone Duck
  • Game nicks: Fuma + sth
  • IRC nick: sF_Leonidas
Ban request on Lukker
« on: September 03, 2012, 08:36:06 pm »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


at the end you can see that he hast th me with purpose and the poll shows that he is a leecher (the poll later got accepted)

PS: A mate will post a video of it and maybe some ss

(click to show/hide)
« Last Edit: September 03, 2012, 08:46:14 pm by sF_Leonidas »
Logged
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Patoson

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 784
  • Infamy: 138
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight
    • View Profile
Re: Ban request on Lukker
« Reply #1 on: September 03, 2012, 08:38:01 pm »
(click to show/hide)

We made a ban poll against him and it succeeded, so everyone knew what he was up to.
Logged

Offline Tibe

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1335
  • Infamy: 287
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
    • View Profile
Re: Ban request on Lukker
« Reply #2 on: September 04, 2012, 07:43:36 am »
1st video I acctually get. DtV might be a hard mode, but aboozing the stupidity of the AI with going to the hut or behind a fence iz just not cool. Still ban he.
Logged

Offline Fuma Kotaro

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 839
  • Infamy: 220
  • cRPG Player
  • I'm Fubadubbaduma
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Lone Duck
  • Game nicks: Fuma + sth
  • IRC nick: sF_Leonidas
Re: Ban request on Lukker
« Reply #3 on: September 04, 2012, 08:01:03 am »
Just to say sth about hut
today dtv is sth else than it used to be in the past back in the days it was about 1 shielder that blocks a door and 2 2h/poles that hit from each side that was dtvillage now in dtv you can play like that anymore and you have to camp most of the time for winning
Logged
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Tibe

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1335
  • Infamy: 287
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
    • View Profile
Re: Ban request on Lukker
« Reply #4 on: September 04, 2012, 08:26:56 am »
Its not about winning. Thou yea.....later lvls do get waaay too tough for anyone to handle. Still id rather loose valiantly than camp somewere. Feels like cheating.
Logged

Offline Nessaj

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1399
  • Infamy: 176
  • cRPG Player Madam Black Queen A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • ▃ ▅ ▅ ▅ ▄ ▅ ▇ ▅ ▄ ▅ ▇
    • View Profile
    • Vanguard
  • Faction: Vanguard
  • Game nicks: Vanguard_Cooties
  • IRC nick: Nessaj
Re: Ban request on Lukker
« Reply #5 on: September 04, 2012, 11:02:41 am »
The evidence is inconclusive except for the TD.

8 hours in the box.

If any of his characters comes up again regarding DTV issues he'll be treated as harshly as humanly possible.
Logged
Things don't exist simply because you believe in them, thus sayeth the almighty creature in the sky!
Pages: [1]