Poll

What do you think?

Yes! Great idea!
14 (73.7%)
No! Terrible idea!
2 (10.5%)
I'm a cute bitch (Since some of you are so daft, this refers to you [the voter], not me [the original poster])
3 (15.8%)

Total Members Voted: 19

Author Topic: Small amendment to the Game Rules  (Read 808 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Tears of Destiny

  • Naive
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1847
  • Infamy: 870
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Quiet drifting through shallow waters. 死のび
    • View Profile
    • NADS
  • Faction: Black Company
  • IRC nick: Tears
Small amendment to the Game Rules
« on: February 06, 2012, 01:44:39 am »
+5
Heavy gauntlets apparently do more punching damage now, and since they cost 16K you can hardly grind properly for gold in them even if it is the only piece of gear that you use (and due to being armour instead of a weapon, no amount of wpf will decrease the break chance).

So, my idea is simple:
Allow Heavy Gauntlets to count as having a "weapon out" as long as you have a real one sheathed as well.
I'm not normal and I don't pretend so, my approach is pretty much a bomb crescendo.
Death is a fun way to pass the time though, several little bullets moving in staccato.
The terror of my reign will live on in infamy, singing when they die like a dead man's symphony.

Offline Zerran

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 276
  • Infamy: 48
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
  • Game nicks: Caita_KUTT, Fellys_KUTT
Re: Small amendment to the Game Rules
« Reply #1 on: February 06, 2012, 01:49:27 am »
0
Please allow this! Beating someone to death pugilist style is one of the most entertaining ways to kill people.  :twisted:
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline TurmoilTom

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1089
  • Infamy: 166
  • cRPG Player
  • Doesn't really play that much anymore
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
Re: Small amendment to the Game Rules
« Reply #2 on: February 06, 2012, 02:19:34 am »
0
This is just the beginning.

It would be nice if it also take armor into account, not just weight. That way loomed gauntlets do more damage.
Blocking with Heavy Gauntlets could act like a shield, but instead of nullifying damage, it only reduces it. I think that would be pretty cool.
Maybe pugilism could also be such a viable play-style that spawning with heavy gauntlets overrides the "spawn with a weapon" rule.  :lol:

Yes.

Also, I'm a cute bitch.

Offline Diomedes

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 200
  • Infamy: 51
  • cRPG Player
  • Cat
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Sootnik_Diomedes
Re: Small amendment to the Game Rules
« Reply #3 on: February 06, 2012, 02:33:38 am »
0
Giving gauntlets a chance to stun + sufficient damage = I'm in favour of them being "weapons."

Offline isatis

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 624
  • Infamy: 78
  • cRPG Player
  • ink+water showing their true potential!
    • View Profile
    • le Clan des Cochons!
  • Faction: Le clan des Cochons!!
  • Game nicks: Cochon_Furtif_Isatis
  • IRC nick: Isatis
Re: Small amendment to the Game Rules
« Reply #4 on: February 06, 2012, 03:15:11 am »
0
on thing I've got to say: The_Pugilist
one of my alt
this play style is rewarding and work, even if long dagger only is better.

I would like to see something implent: gaunt block wep lighter then them and block heavier wep depending on weigth, str and other thing.
why? because, with gauntlet like that i'll grap some of the sword (like scottish if i'm speedy enough) and break them... sooo, anyone strong enough to slash those mace for 1 hour straight can block tiny sword with those plate glove!

knock down: YES!

screen prooving this playstyle is perfectly viable:
(click to show/hide)


so yes heavy gaunt should count as wep
even without bringin other side wep, why should we slow ourselve with useless wep?
So the new response to ranged ragers is not "get a shield", it is "learn to chamber ranged nub!"
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Froto_the_Loc

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 252
  • Infamy: 94
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn
  • CRaPGame
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Locia
  • Game nicks: Froto_the_loc
Re: Small amendment to the Game Rules
« Reply #5 on: February 06, 2012, 08:23:26 am »
0
Now, no one said you had to actually USE the weapon, so long as it was equipped.
Hooray for customization and hybridization!
Down with monotonous pure classes!

Offline Elmokki

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 192
  • Infamy: 18
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: United democratic national whatever
  • Game nicks: elmokki_Krokotiili
  • IRC nick: Elmokki
Re: Small amendment to the Game Rules
« Reply #6 on: February 06, 2012, 11:01:49 am »
0
It's total bullshit to see pugilists in terms of their use for the team, but since the same is sayable for any peasant for example, yes, allow pugilism!

Offline ArchonAlarion

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 98
  • Infamy: 54
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Late 15th cen. English Knight
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: ArchonAlarion, DON'T_WAKE_GRANDPA, NASTY_TURTLE, UNARMED_CLASS_ DON'T_BAN_PLS, et al.
Re: Small amendment to the Game Rules
« Reply #7 on: February 06, 2012, 03:02:30 pm »
+1
UNARMED_CLASS_DONT_BAN_PLS

Offline CrazyCracka420

  • Minute Valuable Contributor
  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 1950
  • Infamy: 794
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Welp
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vaegirs
  • Game nicks: Huseby
  • IRC nick: Steam name: crazycracka420
Re: Small amendment to the Game Rules
« Reply #8 on: February 06, 2012, 06:01:36 pm »
0
I don't think it should be encouraged.  You're better off to your team naked with a pitch fork.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 - Stolen from Macropussy

Offline Froto_the_Loc

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 252
  • Infamy: 94
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn
  • CRaPGame
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Locia
  • Game nicks: Froto_the_loc
Re: Small amendment to the Game Rules
« Reply #9 on: February 06, 2012, 11:30:12 pm »
0
I don't think it should be encouraged.  You're better off to your team naked with a pitch fork.

Fun must be wrong.
Hooray for customization and hybridization!
Down with monotonous pure classes!

Offline Rumblood

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1199
  • Infamy: 420
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: GrannPappy
Re: Small amendment to the Game Rules
« Reply #10 on: February 07, 2012, 12:01:44 am »
0
Fun must be wrong.

Ladders removed, construction discouraged, no jumpshots allowed, no running circles around a strength build with your superior agility allowed.

I think it has been well established that Fun is wrong.
"I don't think much of a man who is not wiser today than he was yesterday" – Abraham Lincoln

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Brrrak

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 442
  • Infamy: 63
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Brrrak
Re: Small amendment to the Game Rules
« Reply #11 on: February 07, 2012, 02:35:23 am »
0
Hi, it's signed...

...only approved.