Poll

Is this a significant imbalance that should be looked into?

Yes.
No.

Author Topic: Rouncey vs. Palfrey  (Read 1809 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Stabby_Dave

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 197
  • Infamy: 34
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Stabby_Dave, Squelch, Dave_The_Longbowman, Faggy_Dave
  • IRC nick: Stabby
Re: Rouncey vs. Palfrey
« Reply #15 on: January 10, 2012, 01:37:21 am »
0
the rouncey wont be a tank, because it still can't take decent damage for a tank horse. it needs more armor, more like 20.

Well it cant be a proper tank because its still a low tier horse.

Offline dodnet

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 595
  • Infamy: 149
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Wolpertinger
  • Game nicks: DoD, DoD_Wolper
Re: Rouncey vs. Palfrey
« Reply #16 on: January 10, 2012, 11:35:39 am »
0
I'm into this but plz dont nerf the Rouncey.
The logic of war seems to be that if a belligerent can fight he will fight.

(click to show/hide)

Offline ArchonAlarion

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 98
  • Infamy: 54
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Late 15th cen. English Knight
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: ArchonAlarion, DON'T_WAKE_GRANDPA, NASTY_TURTLE, UNARMED_CLASS_ DON'T_BAN_PLS, et al.
Re: Rouncey vs. Palfrey
« Reply #17 on: January 10, 2012, 02:50:43 pm »
0
Something as simple as slightly increasing the speed of the palfrey, with a slight reduction in price should do the trick.

43-44 speed
~10,000 gold

Offline CrazyCracka420

  • Minute Valuable Contributor
  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 1950
  • Infamy: 794
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Welp
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vaegirs
  • Game nicks: Huseby
  • IRC nick: Steam name: crazycracka420
Re: Rouncey vs. Palfrey
« Reply #18 on: January 12, 2012, 10:29:19 pm »
0
I choose the palfrey for the 1 extra speed, apparently I didn't really compare the stats or I might have taken the rouncey.

I think moving the speed from 42 to 43 would work, or giving it 42 maneuver. 

But honestly to stay consistent with my views, I think they should just leave it alone.  That 1 extra speed makes it the fastest horse besides the courser.   That's significant enough for some people to pick it over the rouncey (as I did). 
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 - Stolen from Macropussy

Offline Teeth

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2550
  • Infamy: 1057
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Rouncey vs. Palfrey
« Reply #19 on: January 12, 2012, 11:07:27 pm »
0
It's balanced cause the Palfrey looks hawt. Ah well, looks are probably unimportant, buff it.

Offline Gnjus

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1831
  • Infamy: 397
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Siktir git, pislik okçu.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Turklings
Re: Rouncey vs. Palfrey
« Reply #20 on: January 13, 2012, 06:29:46 pm »
0
Being a peasant/villager in real life Fasader should have decent knowledge about horses and balancing mistakes like this shouldn't be possible....but then it's Failsader we're talking about.......
Do you honestly think you have any sort of moral authority, Reyiz? Go genocide some more armenians and deny it ever happened, please, and stay in the middle east.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login