Pages: [1]

Author Topic: [BAN] Kapikulu_cfirat & Kapikulu_BS_Thor  (Read 1072 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Kalp

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 750
  • Infamy: 253
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Form ranks, you maggots!
    • View Profile
    • Kahhhaaargaar!!! Uuurrr!!!
  • Faction: Grey Order
  • Game nicks: Kalp_the_Grey
  • IRC nick: Kalp
[BAN] Kapikulu_cfirat & Kapikulu_BS_Thor
« on: October 30, 2011, 06:31:56 pm »
"CS" spam from weapon rack.

(click to show/hide)


EXTRA people don't read rules.
(click to show/hide)
Logged
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Quote from: Butan on March 13, 2016, 02:00:38 am
The goal of Strategus battles shouldnt be to deprive your enemies of players, but to have full roster both sides and have the gear/tactics/strategy win the day rather than lack of merc support.

Offline Cicero

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 515
  • Infamy: 418
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn
  • scourge of god
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BashiBazouks
  • Game nicks: BashiBazouks_Cicero
  • IRC nick: Cicero
Re: [BAN] Kapikulu_cfirat & Kapikulu_BS_Thor
« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2011, 06:43:51 pm »
lol nice attitude from crapilulu also cfirat is one of crapilulu officer =)
Logged

Offline Kapikulu_Bostanci_Thor

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 3
  • Infamy: 3
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: NOTHING!
  • Game nicks: KilijBeg,UberKofte
  • IRC nick: KilijBeg
Re: [BAN] Kapikulu_cfirat & Kapikulu_BS_Thor
« Reply #2 on: October 30, 2011, 07:36:52 pm »
Reason? I do not see the photo was doing something forbidden
Logged
15 levelim ben

Offline cfirat

  • Beggar
  • Renown: 0
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: [BAN] Kapikulu_cfirat & Kapikulu_BS_Thor
« Reply #3 on: October 30, 2011, 07:37:25 pm »
First it is interesting that Cicero who does not know the meaning of "attitude" is talking about it, I just wanted to mention ...
Secondly, using siege equipment and materials is a widely used tecnhique in siege battles ...
In order to use this as a reason for ban only reminds me of discrimination, nothing else.
It is also interesting that such a request comes from a Grey Order member, who are famous of siege equipment
It is noting but being childish to show the hatred and anger in such ways, and it only shows the difference between playing this game for fun and having this game as a life style
Best regards
Kapikulu_Cfirat
Logged

Offline joozek42

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 25
  • Infamy: 3
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Yoozek and few others...
  • IRC nick: Yoozek
Re: [BAN] Kapikulu_cfirat & Kapikulu_BS_Thor
« Reply #4 on: October 30, 2011, 07:40:48 pm »
Welcome into my topic http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,19617.0.html
Here you will find answers for your questions Thor....
Logged
!! IMAGINAERUM !!

Offline Jarlek

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1173
  • Infamy: 307
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • The walking wiki
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Jarlek_The_Blue, Jarla, Jarlen, Jarler, Jarlec, Jarled OH GOD ALL THESE ALTS
  • IRC nick: Jarlek
Re: [BAN] Kapikulu_cfirat & Kapikulu_BS_Thor
« Reply #5 on: October 30, 2011, 07:43:05 pm »
Quote from: Kapikulu_Bostanci_Thor on October 30, 2011, 07:36:52 pm
Reason? I do not see the photo was doing something forbidden

Getting c-sites and the like from Equipment Chest to use as barricades is banable. Spawning with them and placing them is not.

Quote from: cfirat on October 30, 2011, 07:37:25 pm
First it is interesting that Cicero who does not know the meaning of "attitude" is talking about it, I just wanted to mention ...
Secondly, using siege equipment and materials is a widely used tecnhique in siege battles ...
In order to use this as a reason for ban only reminds me of discrimination, nothing else.
It is also interesting that such a request comes from a Grey Order member, who are famous of siege equipment
It is noting but being childish to show the hatred and anger in such ways, and it only shows the difference between playing this game for fun and having this game as a life style
Best regards
Kapikulu_Cfirat
It WAS a "widely used technique", until the admins made it a banable offense. Before that, Greys did it, and right after the rule came, some were banned. After that, they haven't done it. The fact that you keep doing it means that you are a) ignoring the rules and b) failing to see that those "techniques" are no longer used by Greys and the rest, because unlike you, they actually know the rules now.
Logged
Quote from: Spanish on February 20, 2014, 10:01:44 pm
This game isn't about being skillful as much as its about saying things in general chat that enrage people who then go to murder you but in their rage they make dumb mistakes which gets them killed.
Quote from: chadz on September 10, 2012, 02:13:50 am
In memory of Jarlek_zeh_Blue, ruler of Ilvia

Offline Kalp

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 750
  • Infamy: 253
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Form ranks, you maggots!
    • View Profile
    • Kahhhaaargaar!!! Uuurrr!!!
  • Faction: Grey Order
  • Game nicks: Kalp_the_Grey
  • IRC nick: Kalp
Re: [BAN] Kapikulu_cfirat & Kapikulu_BS_Thor
« Reply #6 on: November 19, 2011, 06:33:41 pm »
bump
Logged
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Quote from: Butan on March 13, 2016, 02:00:38 am
The goal of Strategus battles shouldnt be to deprive your enemies of players, but to have full roster both sides and have the gear/tactics/strategy win the day rather than lack of merc support.

Offline Lansamur

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 232
  • Infamy: 46
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Lansamur, The_Prisoner,Beer_Storage, Carebear_Ravenei
  • IRC nick: Lansamur
Re: [BAN] Kapikulu_cfirat & Kapikulu_BS_Thor
« Reply #7 on: November 26, 2011, 10:06:13 pm »
Both banned till 28th Nov 2011, 22:05.
Logged
[22:17] <@chadz> congratz cmpxchg8b, you managed to put 995 errors into the item sheet!
[22:17] <@cmpxchg8b> epic winning
[22:17] <@cmpxchg8b> beat that Fasader
Pages: [1]