Author Topic: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)  (Read 1620 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matey

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1327
  • Infamy: 372
  • cRPG Player
  • A Pirate
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Matey_BRD
The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
« on: November 14, 2011, 09:36:18 am »
0
Since no one else has made a post...

Good fight guys, and fuck you Raina! you shot me so many damn times when i thought my shield would protect me  :evil:

Offline Digglez

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 573
  • Infamy: 596
  • cRPG Player
  • YOU INCOMPETENT TOH'PAH!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Northmen
  • Game nicks: GotLander, Hamarr, Digglesan, Black_D34th
Re: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
« Reply #1 on: November 14, 2011, 10:12:00 am »
0
FCC equipment was lacking or it would have been a win for them

If they had ladders would have been able to take the roofs and hold them.  Kudos to your melees for defending the roofs for archers.

Offline mandible/splinteryourjaw

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 50
  • Infamy: 12
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2011, 02:14:42 pm »
0
FCC equipment was lacking or it would have been a win for them

If they had ladders would have been able to take the roofs and hold them.  Kudos to your melees for defending the roofs for archers.

One thing about ATS is they know the worth of archers.  I can't tell you how many times in battle one will run in front of me and throw up his shield to protect me while I fight...and me just a randomer...that is appreciated.  It used to be fun to watch Goretooth protect Raina.  If the enemy went for Goretooth, Raina added some weight to them,  If he went towards Raina, Goretooth would remove a little weight with his BEC

Offline Dasty

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 34
  • Infamy: 4
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Among the Shadows
  • Game nicks: Dasty, Dasty_ATS
Re: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2011, 04:01:43 pm »
0
Good fight guys, ended up being very close at the end, we only lost 20 less tickets than you guys at the very end.

And digglez, your equipment wasn't bad at all, you guys had quite a few of those massive board shields. Also, I was surprised when I had to stab some of your guys 3-4 times with my MW Longspear, so your gear wasn't terrible. I usually average 2-3 stabs per kill on the battle server for your information.

Offline Dach

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 444
  • Infamy: 92
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Dach_BRD / SNSD_Taeyeon
Re: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
« Reply #4 on: November 14, 2011, 05:21:13 pm »
0
Sorry I missed that fight...  :shock:

My need to sleep is damn hard opponent to beat!  :lol:
A lot of people in the NA community know that Dach rages and in the process of his uncontrollable rage, he tends to kick people.

You've been warned! :twisted:

Offline Digglez

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 573
  • Infamy: 596
  • cRPG Player
  • YOU INCOMPETENT TOH'PAH!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Northmen
  • Game nicks: GotLander, Hamarr, Digglesan, Black_D34th
Re: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2011, 05:42:25 pm »
0
Good fight guys, ended up being very close at the end, we only lost 20 less tickets than you guys at the very end.

And digglez, your equipment wasn't bad at all, you guys had quite a few of those massive board shields

Round shield > Board shield.

I got shot thru my shield at least 3 times and heard others on TS saying same thing. 

Offline rubicon_crossed

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 44
  • Infamy: 5
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: RubiconCrossed_BRD, Hedge_BRD
Re: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
« Reply #6 on: November 14, 2011, 06:00:25 pm »
0
Good fight, felt like a damn pin cushion by the end there  :D.

Offline Matey

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1327
  • Infamy: 372
  • cRPG Player
  • A Pirate
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Matey_BRD
Re: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
« Reply #7 on: November 14, 2011, 08:08:58 pm »
0
ZE BOARD SHIELDZZZ ZEY DOO NUSSING!

Offline Keshian

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1176
  • Infamy: 992
  • cRPG Player
  • Diggity diggity
    • View Profile
  • Faction: FCC (Bridgeburner, Unicorn, Cavalieres, Narwhal)
  • Game nicks: Red-haired bitch from hell
  • IRC nick: Bitch, pleasssse.
Re: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
« Reply #8 on: November 14, 2011, 08:16:27 pm »
0
ZE BOARD SHIELDZZZ ZEY DOO NUSSING!

And here Gristle slaves over a hot stove blacksmithing these board shields for you all day long and you come home from your battle and this is the thanks he gets.  He never gets appreciated anymore.  No flowers, no sweetalk, just bitch bitch bitch. 

P.S. My fault on the whole no ladder thing guys, sorry.  Really easy to camp all those roofs with ranged by defenders.
http://keshoxford.com/  - Where middle-eastern meets red-hot and spicy!

"[Strat 5]... war game my ass, tis more like a popularity contest"  Plumbo

Offline Damatacus_ATS

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 76
  • Infamy: 9
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
« Reply #9 on: November 14, 2011, 08:50:01 pm »
0
It seemed like you were getting up on that back roof a lot without ladders. You definitely had more archers than us anyways, considering you had 49 fighters to our 29.

Offline Matey

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1327
  • Infamy: 372
  • cRPG Player
  • A Pirate
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Matey_BRD
Re: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
« Reply #10 on: November 14, 2011, 08:51:48 pm »
0
I dunno, as a rambo shielder it sure felt like you guys had more archers than us! lol. I think we had 5 or so archers and 2-3 xbows.

Offline Gristle

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 560
  • Infamy: 130
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BRD
  • Game nicks: Gristle_BRD
Re: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
« Reply #11 on: November 14, 2011, 09:58:46 pm »
0
There is nothing wrong my with my crafted crossbows or board shields! You're not getting shot through the shield. No bow has ever done that to me. I suspect you're just not appreciating the shield's actual size since the force field nerf. You must be aware of how thin they are.

I say bring back the force fields, and just nerf huscarls!

Offline Wiawins_ATS

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 24
  • Infamy: 57
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
« Reply #12 on: November 14, 2011, 10:39:34 pm »
0
I say bring back the force fields, and just nerf huscarls!
Nay. -1

Offline Konrax

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 281
  • Infamy: 107
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Konrax of Chaos
Re: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
« Reply #13 on: November 15, 2011, 05:20:23 pm »
0
FCC equipment was lacking or it would have been a win for them

If they had ladders would have been able to take the roofs and hold them.  Kudos to your melees for defending the roofs for archers.

I guess Kesh should have hired me as a crafter to make some decent armour and shields.

Offline Gristle

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 560
  • Infamy: 130
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BRD
  • Game nicks: Gristle_BRD
Re: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
« Reply #14 on: November 15, 2011, 05:59:54 pm »
0
I guess Kesh should have hired me as a crafter to make some decent armour and shields.

Them's fightin' words!