Author Topic: Ban request - "GoD_Balton_the_Bloody"  (Read 1514 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Digglez

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 573
  • Infamy: 596
  • cRPG Player
  • YOU INCOMPETENT TOH'PAH!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Northmen
  • Game nicks: GotLander, Hamarr, Digglesan, Black_D34th
Re: Ban request - "GoD_Balton_the_Bloody"
« Reply #15 on: October 01, 2011, 06:36:10 pm »
The TK's arent even really the issue, as by the time hes the only one left, the match has already been determined.  The compete failure to contribute anything because hes leeching off in some far corner of the giant map and letting his team die are the major offenses.  I didnt really want to commit that many screenshots to document his behavior as anyone on the server can atest that hes a leech, but I guess we will have to.

Offline SeQuel

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 446
  • Infamy: 129
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: SeQueL
  • IRC nick: SeQueL
Re: Ban request - "GoD_Balton_the_Bloody"
« Reply #16 on: October 01, 2011, 06:40:28 pm »
Definitely some bannable offences here. 2 tk's and some leeching. Hmmmm

Offline Teeth

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2550
  • Infamy: 1057
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Ban request - "GoD_Balton_the_Bloody"
« Reply #17 on: October 01, 2011, 07:49:44 pm »
Balton, your defense please for the TKs?

Inclined to give you one of my cliché 3 day bans for this behavior.
Tears what the hell you peace loving hippy! What defense will make an intentional tk not a bannable offence? Intentional tking should be banned regardless of why it happened. I'm sure people are kinda picky when it comes to Balton and are determined to give him a ban, but these screens show he obviously deservers one.

EDIT: SeQuel is a murican and spells offence, I better do that too.

EDIT2: Tears is a murican and spells defense, shoulnd't it be either offence and defence or offense and defense?

EDIT3: Offence has a different meaning than offense, of course.
« Last Edit: October 01, 2011, 07:58:30 pm by SgtTeeh »

Offline SeQuel

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 446
  • Infamy: 129
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: SeQueL
  • IRC nick: SeQueL
Re: Ban request - "GoD_Balton_the_Bloody"
« Reply #18 on: October 01, 2011, 08:53:34 pm »
Tears what the hell you peace loving hippy! What defense will make an intentional tk not a bannable offence? Intentional tking should be banned regardless of why it happened. I'm sure people are kinda picky when it comes to Balton and are determined to give him a ban, but these screens show he obviously deservers one.

EDIT: SeQuel is a murican and spells offence, I better do that too.

EDIT2: Tears is a murican and spells defense, shoulnd't it be either offence and defence or offense and defense?

EDIT3: Offence has a different meaning than offense, of course.

I'm not an American.

Balton has been banned for 5 days on the account of teamkilling and leeching.

Unban due date : 06.10.2011 20:56:00

« Last Edit: October 02, 2011, 02:04:41 am by SeQuel »