Siege Sundays ! Vote in Poll !

[banned123]

The thing about password lock is, if you have both servers up it splits the community and less people will play seeing both servers at low population. I get why people don't like it but the best way to sustain the community atm is only 1 server at a time.

[Asheram]

I would rather play on a 10 player battle server than any pop seige please don't shut down battle just to force a population on seige.

[Grytviken]

I'll explain the reasoning  behind leaving siege locked the rest of the week. I completely understand that some people would rather just have things be the way they were, but in my opinion that's how we were left with empty servers in the first place, some change is always good.

1: Not split the population

2: Will not need a Dev to constantly turn off the XP boost on the server. Can this be timed? idk. If so maybe it wouldn't need to be locked on the other days.

3: Make it more appealing to the masses by making it an event day.

[Thryn]

man too bad we had the siege server open yesterday and got 50 people to play on some random wednesday

[Voncrow]

The thing about password lock is, if you have both servers up it splits the community and less people will play seeing both servers at low population. I get why people don't like it but the best way to sustain the community atm is only 1 server at a time.

Then make it so the 1 server rotates between the game modes.

If people think that keeping pop on one server is important, it shouldn't only be one group who has to take the bullet. If you want your whole population, come join us on the siege server. I understand how people may not like the siege game type, but I don't get this hypocrisy of people saying its better to keep everyone together, but refuse to unless its their game mode.

Having a server that rotates game modes would solve the problem, since everyone gets what they want.

[Thryn]

the point is you won't ever please the entire population

a gain for one person is a loss for another, and that is the problem here. this is what player choice looks like, and im sorry that crpg having a low population threatens the survival of the mod (welcome to old and dying games).

still, one thing that is crucial for a game's success is player freedom, and that freedom entails players being able to choose what servers they want to play on.

[Penitent]

the point is you won't ever please the entire population

a gain for one person is a loss for another

Or, both parties can gain something great by giving up something small.  This is called compromise.

Both parties lose some freedom, but gain a sweet-ass mod with different game mods, and enjoy the benefit of the FULL population playing together on one sever all the time.

I would love for there to be one server that just plays a siege map once out of every 5 battle maps or something.  Everyone wins!

[Voncrow]

Or, both parties can gain something great by giving up something small.  This is called compromise.

Both parties lose some freedom, but gain a sweet-ass mod with different game mods, and enjoy the benefit of the FULL population playing together on one sever all the time.

I would love for there to be one server that just plays a siege map once out of every 5 battle maps or something.  Everyone wins!

I wouldn't call that a win, I'd be more happy with one battle map every five maps. If you want compromise from that route. Make it more reasonable. Something a bit more evenly divided.