Author Topic: The liberal case for Brexit  (Read 1906 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Grytviken

  • Practicing Scientologist
  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 504
  • Infamy: 101
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Salad_Fork Raven_Grytviken
Re: The liberal case for Brexit
« Reply #15 on: March 30, 2017, 04:17:30 am »
+3
Our Mistress of Defence says that you have to subtract the money we're spending on Nato missions. Meaning the Nato owes us actually :P

If you donate all your money to charity does that exempt you from paying the electric or water bill? Tsk tsk ....what example does this set for the others who are even further behind their obligations..



visitors can't see pics , please register or login
« Last Edit: March 30, 2017, 05:20:34 am by Grytviken »

Offline Xant

  • Finnish Pony
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1552
  • Infamy: 803
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: The liberal case for Brexit
« Reply #16 on: March 30, 2017, 08:00:19 am »
+2
Our Mistress of Defence says that you have to subtract the money we're spending on Nato missions. Meaning the Nato owes us actually :P
How can NATO owe Germany when Germany's a member state of NATO? NATO's missions are Germany's missions as much as they are anyone's. That's like saying you're in debt to yourself because you bought things from the grocery store.
Meaning lies as much
in the mind of the reader
as in the Haiku.

Offline Grytviken

  • Practicing Scientologist
  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 504
  • Infamy: 101
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Salad_Fork Raven_Grytviken
Re: The liberal case for Brexit
« Reply #17 on: March 30, 2017, 08:03:59 am »
+2
How can NATO owe Germany when Germany's a member state of NATO? That's like saying you're in debt to yourself because you bought things from the grocery store.

....2017... having to beg Germany to spend 1%of their budget on their own military because they are going on an international charity rampage... :lol: 

basically they are going above and beyond on peacekeeping, foreign aid and training missions, on that they should be applauded, but at the same time they are not adequately equipping and maintaining their own military equipment to mandatory NATO obligation standards which sets a bad precedent if they ever want other countries to share a equal and proportionate burden of the alliance in the future...
« Last Edit: March 30, 2017, 09:05:17 am by Grytviken »