well, this is working for you, cuz you're an expereinced archer! Im not. Im great at melee and actually doing well at archer!
The difference between the builds is: Mine is a pure archer build with a bit melee. Which is totally enough for me to kill everyone who is actually not beating me in a normal duel.
And playing melee without ath? WHAAAAAAAT Id change 10 ps to 2 ps and 2 ath! Ath is way more effective! If u abuse the speed bonus and the holdings, you will do way better in melee. As an archer, it is not about killing the inf which is fighting u fast. It is about him trying to kill you fast. He will spam dafuq outta u, outrange and kick. With ath and enough ps to not glance I can actually beat him just by abusing his mistakes. With 10 ps and no ath I can't. Well, probably I could, but it is WAY harder. I do rarely loose duels when Im archer. Actually Im getting less hits than with my melee, just cuz I look easy to kill, but I am actually not. With a 27 18 nordic tincan and a flamberge I look like someone who knows what he is doing. With a spiked mace and no helmet I look like a noob who is probably not going to block even one hit! And with speed bonus and holdings, nudges and kicks I can actually rekt most heros with 4-5 hits!
Oh and I need the improvement of wpf. As I said Im no pro archer, I can actually hs everyone standing still on 50 meters with the first shot, but when they are moving.... holy shit I suck when they are moving, thats why I need the wpf
But thx for ur advice, I will try 30 18 too, but not with 9 ps xD I will take like 5 ps and 4 ath!
Oh and actually Im using the long bow, cuz we have it +3 in the armoury. If I could get a rus bow I would probably play with that one, but with the long bow you're such a fucking great cav counter! The third map I played with this archer, I had 190 points, hell I fucking outscored varadin Tommy and kreus easily just by shooting enemy horses!