What´s your Gamer Class? (Scientific!)

[Kafein]

Proud of my low conqueror score. Though i think the test would benefit from 1-10 in terms of 'how important is this experience to you' where 10 is high and 1 is low rather than 'I Love it!' or 'I hate it!' Cos who's going to say 'I hate it!' to 'Beating a challenging boss after a long and difficult fight'? Without outright lying i couldnt get Conqueror lower if i wanted to with questions like that, guess they want most people to come away from the test feeling like Conquerors.

You are merely projecting your wish to be a Conqueror onto the test.

[Xant]

It isn't about feeling proud that you're a conqueror you lord of retards, there's nothing to be proud of, it's just natural for a competitive skill-based game to have a lot of people that are "conquerors." You can name it "xyblrz" if you want. Is someone actually proud that they are a "conqueror"?

[Kafein]

Yeah, you're missing the point Heskey. Conqueror is fun through challenge, it doesn't really matter if you succeed or fail. Actually, only considering success would be an achiever/seeker thing. That is, focusing on what you get for beating the challenge rather than the challenge itself. Sure, there will be conquerors in every gaming community considering that something that provides zero appeal to conquerors is basically not a game (Gone Home for example). Conqueror, mastermind and daredevil are the three dimensions that are specific to games (video or otherwise). cRPG is a very pure game. It doesn't tell you a backstory and it doesn't try to make you feel emotions, which already eliminates two archetypes.

[Xant]

You certainly seem proud. Competitive, skill-based. Mmmm, such winning traits. If you like what the test tells you, you trust the test is a good one.

Like people who believe in horoscopes cos they say nice things about them.

I didn't even take the test, I think it's retarded. Competitive and skill-based are objective facts about M&B, retard.

[Xant]

I think the test is poorly worded and logically flawed with incredibly leading questions.

Or in words you'll understand, I also think the test is retarded.

Well, why didn't you just say so?

[Jambi]

Well, why didn't you just say so?

[Christo]

cRPG is a very pure game. It doesn't tell you a backstory and it doesn't try to make you feel emotions, which already eliminates two archetypes.

and it doesn't try to make you feel emotions

and it doesn't try to make you feel emotions

 

[Jambi]

 

You get emotional when playing crpg? Is that what your trying to say 

[Christo]

Countless rage and drama threads on this forum have proven otherwise

[Jambi]

Countless rage and drama threads on this forum have proven otherwise

Quenstionable...
Some people make themselves emotional, by taking videogames to seriously.
Ive studied most crpg players for years now, i dont think its the game causing these forum threads, its autism.
CRpg simply is a trigger for these people.

[AwesomeHail]

Your BrainHex Class is Conqueror.

Your BrainHex Class Your BrainHex Sub-Class is Conqueror-Socialiser.

You like defeating impossibly difficult foes, struggling until you eventually achieve victory, and beating other players as well as hanging around with people you trust and helping people.

According to your results, there are few play experiences that you strongly dislike.

Your scores for each of the classes in this test were as follows:

Conqueror: 19
Socialiser: 18
Seeker: 14
Survivor: 12
Daredevil: 11
Achiever: 6
Mastermind: 2

alright i guess

[Kafein]

Countless rage and drama threads on this forum have proven otherwise

Well I wouldn't know, I hope it has been established by now that I have the emotional range of a wet cabbage.

I think you're missing my point.

My point is i dont believe it's possible for anyone in the world that's ever seen a video game to *not* get a strong degree of conqueror in this test simply based on the wording of the questions.

I think the wording is flawed, and i'd love to see the stats of how many people (if any) *havent* gotten any conqueror on this test. Since if everyone gets it, then it's a pointless category. Who says 'I hate it' when they've just beaten a challenging boss? Why does that question even exist?

You certainly seem proud. Competitive, skill-based. Mmmm, such winning traits. If you like what the test tells you, you trust the test is a good one.

Like people who believe in horoscopes cos they say nice things about them.

I think you're merely forgetting about all these people that are simply not attracted to games in general. Sad people without a doubt, but you can't exclude them from the statistics.

It even exists within "interactive media". Words like "competitive" or "skill-based" are insults for those West Coast artsy non-game hipsters.