Thin Ice v2 (or v999)

[Molly]

Heskey is right tho. Those pics proof nothing really. And history shouldn't matter, especially not when there is no proof.
A ban would be a bad excuse for getting rid of someone for other matters than the proof provided.

[Utrakil]

Never really got on with him personally, but i can understand the desire to try and make the game interesting for yourself if the gameplay itself no longer does. Everyone bro-codes to some extent anyway.

The main thing i wanted to know is regardless of history, for a ban thread to be successful surely it has to depict something ban-worthy

Wandering the map without engaging in any fighting is leeching and therefore banworthy.
How do you want to depict it other than posting pictures of the character wandering parts of the map where never any enemy is seen?

[Uther Pendragon]

I talked to Fuma on steam and consulted with other admins. He accepts his fate and others agree that his behaviour almost never changes, so action must be taken.

Just let me remind you,

Not contributing is leeching

Also, bro-coding, also, his ban history does speaks for itself:

Next time for both of them, it will be an essay ban.

Banned for 1 month, after that passes he can write an essay, minimum 500 words on "Why should I contribute?"