Author Topic: Conquest on Siege!  (Read 1133 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Man of Steel

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 368
  • Infamy: 138
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Linux, Traitor
Conquest on Siege!
« on: December 27, 2014, 07:34:00 pm »
+3
It's simply, I am not a men of much words, so I keep it short.
I think the Time of Conquest is over. Fips should remove it from the Server. Conqest is a really good Idea and we all enjoy it. But now with like 30-45 Players the Maps are just too large.
And the most Players are leaving if there gets a Conqest map on.
So remove it for now and if there are a lot of Guys on the Server who wish for Conqest maybe they can ask some playing admin to change map.
But it should be taken out of the normal map Rotation on Eu2.
For fuck sake Linux, fix your signature.

Offline Tuetensuppe

  • Event Manager
  • *
  • Renown: 1057
  • Infamy: 88
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Tuetensuppe Tojtensoup_throwing_spoons Merc_cry_me_a_soup
Re: Conquest on Siege!
« Reply #1 on: December 28, 2014, 05:55:19 am »
+3
But i just made two conquest maps ready to upload :(


....well i think its easy to let them become  normale siege maps with some editing, so nevermind ;)
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Quote from: Gnjus
yes thats the problem, no more nice clans, everyone acts like theyre the real thing but all are just greedy backstabbing arrogant sons of bitches

Offline Voncrow

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 474
  • Infamy: 108
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
  • No honour in retreat
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Sovereign Kingdom of Thirdarrel
  • Game nicks: Voncrow, Bane, Velcrow
Re: Conquest on Siege!
« Reply #2 on: December 28, 2014, 06:13:37 am »
+1
Get in line, NA has been asking for this for a while, not that matters since barely anyone plays battle let alone siege.
'The only people who might be put off M:BG by the current state of cRPG would be cRPG players, and we don't want that kind of scum in M:BG anyway.' - Heskey

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Tindel

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 333
  • Infamy: 238
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Tindel
Re: Conquest on Siege!
« Reply #3 on: December 30, 2014, 01:08:30 am »
0
too many shitty maps on eu2 to count, im on a break until they are removed.

Offline Falka

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1257
  • Infamy: 423
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Conquest on Siege!
« Reply #4 on: December 30, 2014, 01:29:38 am »
0
The only time when I see 60 players on Eu2 is when there's conquest, so... I don't agree with you.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Leshma

  • Kickstarter Addict
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 175
  • Infamy: 2323
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • VOTE 2024
    • View Profile
Re: Conquest on Siege!
« Reply #5 on: December 30, 2014, 01:32:54 am »
+4
Solution: x5 for both teams during conquest.

Offline Man of Steel

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 368
  • Infamy: 138
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Linux, Traitor
Re: Conquest on Siege!
« Reply #6 on: December 30, 2014, 09:31:42 am »
+2
The only time when I see 60 players on Eu2 is when there's conquest, so... I don't agree with you.
As i said, if there are a lot of players who really want conqest they should be abel to ask an admin to change map, but if there are just like 20 players conquest kills the server
For fuck sake Linux, fix your signature.

Offline FleetFox

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 711
  • Infamy: 72
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Fox Shox Rox
    • View Profile
  • Faction: The Norsemen
  • Game nicks: Norse_Torr and FleetFox
Re: Conquest on Siege!
« Reply #7 on: December 30, 2014, 10:26:20 am »
+5
Basically we need to be able to vote for a new map, its a freedom us players need, so please revert it back it would solve all the problems (perhaps).
"Its better to die on your feet than to live on your knees."
― Emiliano Zapata

Offline Admerius

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 313
  • Infamy: 60
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
  • Many Admerius-es and many alts(Total of 32 chars)
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Sovereignty of Aegis for life!(aka. multi-claning)
  • Game nicks: My top three nicks: Scum, William_Spearshake, Dedrater)
Re: Conquest on Siege!
« Reply #8 on: December 30, 2014, 01:00:06 pm »
0
...its a FREEDOM US players need...

Fixed

Offline BlindGuy

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 996
  • Infamy: 583
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • De oppresso liber et plus ultra.
    • View Profile
Re: Conquest on Siege!
« Reply #9 on: December 30, 2014, 01:07:39 pm »
+1
I don't know if it's possible, but maybe a system like we see in many FPS games, etc: when its matchpoint (one more win for a team to win) or the timer is coming down on last round or something, have a poll come up automatically with some maps on it: 1 for map A, 2 for map b, etc, and then the playerbase who is playing at that moment could decide on what they want as a majority. Would take a week or two to work while everyone who plays on the regular learns the map names, but after that it would smooth out any problems people have with maps since we can assume the majority of the server population are playing a map they want.
I don't know enough

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Leshma

  • Kickstarter Addict
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2903
  • Infamy: 2553
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • VOTE 2024
    • View Profile
Re: Conquest on Siege!
« Reply #10 on: December 30, 2014, 02:42:29 pm »
0
There are two issues with conquest:
  • player mindset - it last too long and teams usually have x2 which makes them believe they are wasting their time that could be spent grinding somewhere else and more efficiently, my x5 proposition is for real because it will solve this issue and make conquest most popular game mode
  • couple of rounds in a row on the same map - when there is conquest time on siege server, instead of couple of rounds on the same map it would be better to make it couple of rounds on different conquest maps

Otherwise it's a great game mod, fun and engaging, feels like TDM a bit. Pure fun, if we ignore issues listed above.

Offline Man of Steel

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 368
  • Infamy: 138
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Linux, Traitor
Re: Conquest on Siege!
« Reply #11 on: January 01, 2015, 11:12:02 pm »
0
I don't know...
This thread is quiet dead but i think there are a lot of guys sharing the same problem....
For fuck sake Linux, fix your signature.

Offline Ras_FrenzYYY

  • Mad Cuz Bad
  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 363
  • Infamy: 482
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Conquest on Siege!
« Reply #12 on: January 03, 2015, 10:25:40 am »
0
Solution: x5 for both teams during conquest.

I asked for double Xp on conquest a year ago .

The devs didnt care .They preferred to kille the mod by increasing level cap and make the mod even more of a spammy agi whore game.

"Don't cry because it's over. Smile because it happened"