Author Topic: [Ban] Kirman  (Read 1028 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Protemus

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 346
  • Infamy: 270
  • cRPG Player
  • EZ
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Clan EZ kills
  • Game nicks: niluK_the_Annoying aka EZ
[Ban] Kirman
« on: September 21, 2014, 01:52:03 pm »
1. Name of your character involved - Smurf_niluK

2. Name of offending character(s) - Vanguard_Kirman

3. Time and server, as accurately as possible - Eu_cRPG_1, CET 12:30 - 12:50pm, 21.9.2014

4. Written description of what happened, the whole story. Also what happened before and after. - I am being bullied as always for playing HA class, and as you can see in a screenshot below he was the last I killed during the round, the round ends, new one begins and instant poll is made by the same person (Kirman) which then passes with 56% of votes.
Oh also this was his second poll, first one also passed and I was kicked but I didn't do any screenshot because I didn't expect he'll do it again.


5. Why you think the offender did what he did.*- Angry because he's getting shot from a far and he can't do nothing to stop it.

6. Multiple Screenshots -
(click to show/hide)

7. Names of players who witnessed what happened.** - Obviously Phase who entered and other names mentioned in screenshot, at the moment there was like 30 players actively playing
Quote from: Melee Gaming
Protemus, You have received a warning for non-relevant posts in ban section also for personal attacks with disgusting insults on the forums. Chill out and enjoy the game. Regards, cRPG Team

Offline Kirman

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 609
  • Infamy: 69
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Tormatun
  • Game nicks: Kirman/Namrik/Anmirk/Riknam
Re: [Ban] Kirman
« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2014, 01:59:34 pm »
First of all, it wasn't me who made the first poll. Yes, mine was a ragepoll, i was at the flags and you just didnt let me play.... So i accept my punishment. To be honest i might do the same thing again if i will be in same situation again. Thanks.
« Last Edit: September 21, 2014, 03:40:00 pm by Xside »

Offline Algarn

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1230
  • Infamy: 268
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Algarn, Jorick
Re: [Ban] Kirman
« Reply #2 on: September 21, 2014, 02:02:50 pm »
You were delaying, nothing else to add, besides you should be banned instead of Kirman.

Offline Man of Steel

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 368
  • Infamy: 138
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Linux, Traitor
Re: [Ban] Kirman
« Reply #3 on: September 21, 2014, 02:04:11 pm »
Yep, were delaying. I saw it too
For fuck sake Linux, fix your signature.

Offline Protemus

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 346
  • Infamy: 270
  • cRPG Player
  • EZ
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Clan EZ kills
  • Game nicks: niluK_the_Annoying aka EZ
Re: [Ban] Kirman
« Reply #4 on: September 21, 2014, 02:17:04 pm »
There's a diffrence between delaying and fighting, your problem is I fight from horse and I'm ranged, I was trying to win that and every other round like every single of you, the only thing you hate is my playstyle.
Quote from: Melee Gaming
Protemus, You have received a warning for non-relevant posts in ban section also for personal attacks with disgusting insults on the forums. Chill out and enjoy the game. Regards, cRPG Team

Offline Algarn

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1230
  • Infamy: 268
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Algarn, Jorick
Re: [Ban] Kirman
« Reply #5 on: September 21, 2014, 02:49:47 pm »
To any admin seeing that thread, notice that the poll got 56% of people voting yes. If Kirman is banned for ragepoll, then, Niluk should be banned for delaying every single round when he can.

Offline Protemus

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 346
  • Infamy: 270
  • cRPG Player
  • EZ
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Clan EZ kills
  • Game nicks: niluK_the_Annoying aka EZ
Re: [Ban] Kirman
« Reply #6 on: September 21, 2014, 03:40:46 pm »
To any admin seeing that thread, notice that the poll got 56% of people voting yes. If Kirman is banned for ragepoll, then, Niluk should be banned for delaying every single round when he can.

I never delay, I only try to win every round if possible, if trying to win a round is bannable then do it, I'm guilty as charged
Quote from: Melee Gaming
Protemus, You have received a warning for non-relevant posts in ban section also for personal attacks with disgusting insults on the forums. Chill out and enjoy the game. Regards, cRPG Team

Offline Kidduis

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 146
  • Infamy: 22
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Kiddius, Fittius, Shittius, Svedjan
Re: [Ban] Kirman
« Reply #7 on: September 23, 2014, 09:00:09 am »
Going  away from the flag to duel a archer at spawn is not fighting near the flag.

Don't mute me plezh
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Molly

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1860
  • Infamy: 693
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
    • For the glorious Khorin...
  • Game nicks: Molly
Re: [Ban] Kirman
« Reply #8 on: September 23, 2014, 09:58:11 am »
I remember that I was on the server when this happened but to be honest, I do not remember how this poll came to be in particular.
What I'd like to add is that Protemus has the tendency to NOT attack the flag when it spawns but instead to engage some far off single target.

I can only assume that it is to secure valor for an obvious lost round.

So I can understand that the majority of the server would see such behaviour as delaying and consequently vote "Yes" on a Kick Poll.
When west germany annexed east germany, nobody moved a finger too.

Offline Erzengel

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 769
  • Infamy: 214
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Norse_Erzengel
Re: [Ban] Kirman
« Reply #9 on: September 23, 2014, 10:23:56 am »
Kirman gets a warning since he has no previous bans and it isn't 100% clear to me if you were delaying or not.

Please also try not to annoy/provoke other people with your playstyle.