responding in terms of allers' ban.
Suicide leeching is still leeching.
Direct quote from yourself:
Quote from: Allers on June 15, 2014, 11:06:57 pm
I run into the battle with equipment i choose to die by them hitting me I need money so i go with cheap gear and i dont feel like trying so i choose to not block?
That is the very definition of suicide leeching. Running at the enemy with no intent on fighting. Case closed, offense admitted in ban thread, appeal denied.
The thing about this ban is that it was not overturned into an unban. Unbans are ment for people who were banned and would like to make a case for themselves to the admins as to why they were unbanned. In the unban thread there were multiple people who said that they had seen him swinging and attempting to do damage to the other team. At the end of the thread (when it was locked) the above quote was posted and it was quite frustrating. Yes, the exact definition of suicide leeching is running at the enemy with no intent of fighting, however, multiple people had said he had not done so and he nowhere in the quote you posted said he had no intention of swinging nor had given the hint. In the quote from allers that you posted he had said he had no intent on blocking.
Now comes a lot of regurgitation from the thread in general discussion that no admins seem to be posting worth while responses to, so, I thought I might as well post them here.
1. if allers is banned for not blocking or caring much, and this is actually a good reason for his ban, why is half of the NA community not banned?
2. why is it that he was seemingly banned not because of what he did but because of his record? quote from Eyebeat in the unban thread:
Allers has been given more chances than anyone. Seriously doubt this will get over turned.
hopefully we can have some discussion with the admins in this thread.