Another useless suggestion no one reads

[Thomek]

What we need is win to loss ratio on a round by round basis.

K:D ratio only tells so much about a player..

[dreadnok]

I think they might implement an options for that, like:
"Don't count ranged deaths",
"Don't count backstab deaths",
"Don't count horsemy old friend deaths" etc, for more accurate statistics.

I support this 100 percent

[bagge]

Only 3574 kills at 34 lol. I had 15k last time I was lv 34.

Strat ftw

ps: good idea. Also what Thomek said, that'd be cuul

[rufio]

you forgot to include siege

[Macropus]

Bump.
Also:

What we need is win to loss ratio on a round by round basis.

[Sir_Hans]

+1 to OP

I like this idea!

[Clockworkkiller]

worrying over K/D?

really, wtf?

what are you??
8-yr olds playing cawadooty?

[Mr.K.]

worrying over K/D?

It can show if you're getting better so it's useful imo. I think this should be implemented if it's not too difficult. Win/loss ratio would be even better though.

I got only 1337 deaths at lvl34. Yeah, Strat ftw

[Torben]

I'd rly like a strat k/d : )

[GRANDMOM]

I'd rly like a strat k/d : )

Would people then sign up for the attacking sidein a fief? Or the sidewith worse gear in any battle? Well not saying that everyone will care but anyway

[Macropus]

worrying over K/D?

really, wtf?

what are you??
8-yr olds playing cawadooty?

There's quite a difference between worrying about k/d and willing to see your own progress in an objective way, which current k/d isn't.
So yeah, shut up.

[bagge]

I'd rly like a strat k/d : )

That would make archers ignore catapults even more.

[Torben]

haha,  maybe you are right ^^