Author Topic: Polearms vs Two handers  (Read 11705 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Artyem

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1218
  • Infamy: 264
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight
  • SODOM Shaman
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Dracul / Raven / SODOMY
  • Game nicks: Artyem
Re: Polearms vs Two handers
« Reply #210 on: June 02, 2013, 06:31:49 pm »
+4
Well, after playing nothing but 2h on my main for a good two years, with polearm alts and eventually two generations as a polearmer, I can say this:

Even with 100+ ping, playing as a two hander is laughably easy.  Most of the time I find myself with very little reason to block, because I can out speed probably 75% of the people I encounter.  I honestly think that 2h wasn't effected at all by the turn rate nerf, seeing as how I can still spin around and use the hilt of my sword to effectively disembowel my enemies, while if the same thing was attempted with most polearms, I would be stuck looking 90 degrees to my left with a blade in my head.

The real advantage I find with polearms, is that they can be wiggled very effectively to seriously confuse your opponent (Kaoklai does this very well), and it's usually not hard to hit around a block or shield.  However, this can still be countered most of the time, since they're usually slower than you and can't feint 2-3 times and still hit you while you're mid swing.

Currently playing polearm / 1h, sometimes I hoplite with a +3 bamboo spear, but on most maps a German poleaxe or my +3 scimitar work best by themselves.


EDIT:

Not saying this or that should be buffed/nerfed, but I do think there may be a slight issue with 2h gameplay.
« Last Edit: June 02, 2013, 06:40:53 pm by Artyem »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Sordida asinum latronibus sumus