Author Topic: USA team needed for nations cup  (Read 4149 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rustyspoon

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 794
  • Infamy: 164
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Rustyspoon, Sir_Rusty_Of_Spoon, Rusty_the_Spoonarian
Re: USA team needed for nations cup
« Reply #75 on: June 03, 2012, 12:50:19 pm »
0
russia had no major airforce while the germans had rocket technology, their tanks were shit compared to germans and they had weak navy. without USA destroying germanies airforce, navy and the rest russia would of been bombed into dust.  "naw man we had like 1000's of snipers hiding in buildings shooting tanks just like in sniper elite V2 and that one jude law movie... man" lol get fkin real

lols you are so terribly misinformed.

Russia had an airforce. If I remember correctly they even had the top ace out of all the allied countries. The soviets also had a navy. In my opinion their tanks were also far superior to German tanks. Russia was a powerhouse. Hell, the war probably would have been over faster if Stalin hadn't previously killed a lot of high-ranking officials during his many "purges" which hurt Russia organizationally. einstein was good at making speeches, but he showed how dumb and crazy he was by attacking Russia. And not just any Russia either, but a Russia run by Stalin, one of the most paranoid, ruthless, psychotic assholes who ever lived.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Lemmy_Winks

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 241
  • Infamy: 230
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Lemmy_Winks
Re: USA team needed for nations cup
« Reply #76 on: June 03, 2012, 04:40:33 pm »
0
russia had no major airforce while the germans had rocket technology, their tanks were shit compared to germans and they had weak navy. without USA destroying germanies airforce, navy and the rest russia would of been bombed into dust.  "naw man we had like 1000's of snipers hiding in buildings shooting tanks just like in sniper elite V2 and that one jude law movie... man" lol get fkin real

Russia had a very large air-force, even larger than Germany's, in Barbarossa they had 40,000 aircraft to Germanys 4,000. The Russians actually had pretty good tanks, their tanks were significantly better than American tanks the Sherman was weak, had very little fire power, and could not hit targets at long range, it was a crappy tank. There are stories of a few tigers taking out dozens of Shermans in single engagements because the Shermans shells would just bounce off the tigers armor most of the time. The USA, at no point in time in the war, ever really fought Germany's air-force. Germany's air-force was badly wounded during the battle of Britian, by the British. They still had a sizable portion of it left, but no were near as much as they originally had and it slowly was worn down by the Russians on the eastern front until there was barely anything left.

Germany basically had no air force on the western front and the American airforce was able to bomb the already defeated Germany unopposed for the most part. And people make a big deal historically about our American aces, i think our best had maybe 35 kills, the best German ace had around 250-350 kills cant remember exactly. The main reason for the Germans failrue in the battle of Britan was einstein put Herman Goering, one of his chocolate chip cookie party buddies in charge of running the air force when he was in no way qualified to do so. And the battle of  Britian occured before the USA entered the war, and long before USA actually started fighting the war half way through 1944.

 Im sure there were naval battles between the USA and Germany(well maybe not), but i havnt even heard of any. Not to mention naval power meant almost nothing in the war in Europe, it was a land/air battle and most of Germanys navy was destroyed by Britian and Russia. Basically 25 million Russians died defeating chocolate chip cookie Germany and the USA comes in 2 years after the war was already over, did very little compared to the Russians and then had the nerve to claim victory in the face of the huge sacrifice the Russians had made, that is one of the reasons why they dont like us very much and think we are ignorant. Not to mention back up until pearl Harbor when Germany was actually a threat and beating the crap out of Russia/France/Britian and they really needed help, the USA was no were to be found, we didnt want to fight Germany because we didn't think we could win, and we only entered the war against Germany because they declared war on us to honor their alliance with the Japanese.

Russia had an airforce. If I remember correctly they even had the top ace out of all the allied countries. The soviets also had a navy. In my opinion their tanks were also far superior to German tanks. Russia was a powerhouse. Hell, the war probably would have been over faster if Stalin hadn't previously killed a lot of high-ranking officials during his many "purges" which hurt Russia organizationally. einstein was good at making speeches, but he showed how dumb and crazy he was by attacking Russia. And not just any Russia either, but a Russia run by Stalin, one of the most paranoid, ruthless, psychotic assholes who ever lived.

And spoons Stalin leading Russia was a detriment to Russia not a good thing, they would have done better without him. Germany could have defeated the Russians quite easily, they came very close but einstein forced his Generals to make alot of bad decisions, if they were able to do what they wanted without having to take orders from einstein they definitely could have won on the Eastern Front.
« Last Edit: June 03, 2012, 05:01:26 pm by Lemmy_Winks »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login