"You got a KICK because of two tks, where one was obiously intentional (I was watching it in spectator)."
Incorrect. One TK, One team attack. May I also point out of the burden of proof is on you.
"Then you raged and started insulting me, instead of trying to find out what rule you broke to challenge my decision."
I am fully within reason to challenge a decision that is built on a flawed basis (that I had TKed TWICE) and one that is hastily taken without a warning or further enquiry.
"Ofc, this ended in a mute, and I started to regret that I made a exception for you. Usually I give people who intentional tks a day to cool down, and I admit I should have done this to you too. AT this point, I changed my decision and gave you a 1d ban. But as you started to require my attention on IRC, I had to delay the ban."
My mistake is that I get hot headed. I fully admit that. However, that I'm a hot headed prick doesn't validate your lack of clear and legitimate reasoning. Like I said, there was ONE TK, not TWO. Furthermore, you punished me by kicking me on a wrong basis and then proceeded to mute me. Show a little empathy and put yourself in my boots: wouldn't you be pissed off if you just got stuffed by an admin, then he mutes you when you try and get a little justice? Of course you would.
"On IRC I noticed that you did not only dismiss my decision. You also stated that:
-Your allowed to tk someone as a joke"
Evidence. And do not mistake me saying I done it as a joke as a 'mitigating reason' with me saying it as it is a good reason. As I said, based on your rules and on further reflection, this was wrong of me.
"-Your allowed to tk after round has ended"
Yes, I have read your (late) rules on this forum.
"-You should only be warned if doing an intentional tk."
No, I said your punishment is inconsistent to the point of being unjust, unfair and trivial. Then you and others proceeded to argue with me over what a punishment is as opposed to a warning. Somehow, the admins concluded a kick (a punishment) is a warning (an action intended to inform someone of reprisals if they continue a course of action). As I said, you don't jail someone as a warning, you warn them. You reasoning is flawed in the outset.
"-That this is not about you tking, but about me disliking you (yes, thats why I kicked you instead of banning, its because I hate you </sarcasm>)"
Fact is I don't know whether you dislike me or not. And fact is I don't care. You got your facts wrong and pissed me off. And people get pissed off when they get treated unfairly because they don't get a chance to say their piece without all the bullshit (and time consuming process) of rhetoric, justification, forum posting, etc. And because they've just had a long day, are tired, and want to relax.
"Also ,the decision of posting the rules on the forum was made before this happened, it just took some time. And, might I also add, Ive asked for em several times."
And? To use an analogy; I could take a decision to draft a new law to protect women from being raped, and while I "took some time" those same women would be victims without the protection of that law. Who get's the blame? The drafter for taking his sweet arse time, not the women. Do not disguise your lack of professionalism with feeble excuses.
"Your attitude is that YOU should have fun, even if you destroy the fun for others. This is why we got admins, to let people have fun without being griefed by people who think thats fun."
And how exactly does team attacking at the end of a round destroy the fun of others. Is this "destroy" in the same sense as they're "entire gaming session is ruined because of one over zealous admin?" Or is this destroy as in "barely any real effect at all in the grand scheme of things."
"PS. Your allowed to disagree about the rules. But then the enforcer of the rules aint the problem. If you wanna be permitted to intentionally tk people, go make a thread about removing the rule, instead of attacking me for enforcing the rule. Tho, I dont think youll get a lot of support."
I don't think you will get a lot of support for getting the facts wrong. Not the first time this has happend may I point out. I have seen threads whereby you have made mistakes and banned or kicked: I don't see you getting punished for it when you expend anothers time by your own incompetence. Also, contrary to the admin thread, there are quite a lot of nominations indicating that you are indeed the problem.
Thus, in conclusion, may I also point out it's also fair for us to comment on the INCOMPETENCE of an admin, which we are zealously doing at this moment in the admin abuse forum.
