Poll

I liked the balance of the previous version,  except throwing beeing under powered. u guys agree?

ya,  although a lot of whine was going on,  classes were nicely fine tuned in the context of battle if a fair distribution was achieved in both teams
17 (47.2%)
no,  fuck you
6 (16.7%)
i liked everything,  but one class was off (elaborate)
7 (19.4%)
meh.
1 (2.8%)
eat horseshit,  cavloving craphole     (horsebukkake ftw!)
5 (13.9%)

Total Members Voted: 36

Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: game balance of previous crpg version  (Read 2034 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Siiem

  • Heretic
  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 611
  • Infamy: 129
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: game balance of previous crpg version
« Reply #15 on: July 11, 2011, 06:58:17 am »
0
Quote from: Torben on July 11, 2011, 06:54:26 am
thats why i said speedbonus and headshot ^^

But this was not about full speed horses charging you, even 1h can one hit with a full charge and headhit... Headhits are deadly I can accept that... but lance thrust from a nearly stand still horse to your torso 1 hitting is silly... lances are supposed to force that tootpick thing into you from a horse speeding at you. Sadly the only weapon that forces this is the great lance/tourney lance?
« Last Edit: July 11, 2011, 07:02:14 am by Siiem »
Logged

Offline Vibe

  • Vibrator
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2528
  • Infamy: 615
  • cRPG Player Madam White Queen A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: game balance of previous crpg version
« Reply #16 on: July 11, 2011, 09:43:37 am »
0
Only real changes needed were lancers (nerf a bit) and throwers (buff).
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]