Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Baddy

Pages: [1]
1
General Discussion / If you buy plate, you're a special boy
« on: January 30, 2011, 06:37:35 am »
Utterly useless

2
General Discussion / Re: Regarding Ladders
« on: January 18, 2011, 08:49:25 pm »
Is fungineering truely leeching compared to just peasanting it up and dying real fast? If anything, it's a sound strategic tactic to draw attention away from your army (archers).

3
General Discussion / Re: Regarding Ladders
« on: January 18, 2011, 08:37:24 pm »
Personally I enjoy the wonderful archers/horse archers that draw rounds constantly. They really help my immersion, however ladders are a serious detraction. I will not stand for this magical wizardry of floating ladders in my pure waifu crpg.

4
General Discussion / Re: Archers buffed too much
« on: January 14, 2011, 12:34:33 am »
This sentence is obsolete, and said a million time, is this your only answer to improve the fun and gameplay of other players?

1handers have a shield, a lot of 2handers and polearm have a shield, we even see archers with a shield... (are they traitors?)

Well it's not exactly fun to have rounds draw because archers run around away from people and then the next game nobody gains any exp/gold.

5
General Discussion / Re: Archers buffed too much
« on: January 13, 2011, 11:02:54 pm »
Yeah but all the 2h elitists view shielders as scrub no-skill players so that'll never happen.

That's funny considering 2h takes the least amount of "skill" to roll the field. Double funny if they're using katana or flamberge

6
General Discussion / Re: Build Discussion
« on: January 13, 2011, 10:43:26 pm »
right now I'm focused on polearms
level 28

18 str
16 agi
134 pole wpf
6 IF
6 powerstrike
5 athletics
4 weapon master

currently have 6 skill points not doing anything.

What should I do with them? Get some cav for something else?

7
General Discussion / Re: Archers buffed too much
« on: January 13, 2011, 10:31:42 pm »
[IRL arguments coming]
Actually at that time plate wasnt that dominant. Longbow was very effective against mail, not plate. Plate at that time was very thick and heavy. Horses also were mostly unarmored. When later on Battle of Vernuil came abouts it was the first time effective plate against longbows was on the field. There was a huge development in steel working. It was the lombard cavalry from milan. That armor was much lighter and they rode through the longbowmen also because it was light enough to protect alot of the horse.
Well you're right that mail was the dominant armor. Plate was just too expensive to make. Also, it wasn't very heavy. Battle plate armor would only weigh about 50 pounds, lighter than modern infantry loadouts. Plate wearers were still quite agile on the battlefield and could easily run down archers. Only time you ever see those big heavy ass plate is in jousts, since the idea is 100% protection as nobody wants to die in a lowly joust instead of glorious battle!

8
General Discussion / Re: Archers buffed too much
« on: January 13, 2011, 10:17:07 pm »
I'm willing to bet that if shields were more popular than 2h then there wouldn't  be as much crying about archers.

Get one of the cheapo shields. Use while advancing. Stop being scrubs.

9
I heard you guys like ladders?

yes we do

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Pages: [1]