2
« on: February 04, 2012, 12:55:56 pm »
I think cavalry is ok now.
Don't forget that the price of the equipment of a horseman is much larger than an infantry man.
Also all of you who whine about cavalry,what do you do about it in the battlefield?My self I tried to play as halberdier...I would mainly protect my team's infantry from cavalry attacks..Most of them would just go back,and the ones who attacked were stopped/killed.It is accurate and realistic for cavalry to destroy shielded infantry and ranged one.Two handers can kill cavalry depending on skill.
All of you want your class to kill everything and be efficient in money.
Shielders are cheap,can kill rangers,2handers,why should they kill cav too?
2handers are ok in money,kill every other inf except ranged that is easy to cover from and can do good with cav.
rangers are ok with money,can do good with everything from a distance....
spears and pikes are cheap and are only good against cav
poleaxes and good vs both inf and cav but are a bit more expensive.
Cavalry suck in money are good vs rangers,shielder,capable vs 2handers and suck vs polearms
I think this balance is ok,just use your polearms more effectively.They should protect their teammates against cav,not other inf.LEARN TO WORK AS A TEAM...The only thing that I dont like about crpg that with the new update archers are waaayy too weak.Just a bit more dmg would be good...