1
General Discussion / Re: 54 Loom Point Giveaway (18 Winners)
« on: April 25, 2019, 03:27:09 pm »
I would like 2 kiss u and 2 get some loom points
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
Strategus Issues / Character level 0 in strat battles, division by zero?
« on: April 19, 2019, 04:09:57 pm »
Every time I've tried to join one of the Asian strategus battles that I've signed up for, I've encountered some weird issues.
I am level 0 for the entirety of the map and as far as I'm aware, my statistics treat me as if I weren't present in the battle.
I also get chat error spam of "SCRIPT ERROR: division by zero.
As I'm level 0, I can't equip any gear nor assist in any meaningful way in the battle, and I don't get paid regardless of whether I was actually at the battle or not.
Screenshot for evidence below.
Pls fix and give me my money and xp
https://imgur.com/a3fnBKJ
I am level 0 for the entirety of the map and as far as I'm aware, my statistics treat me as if I weren't present in the battle.
I also get chat error spam of "SCRIPT ERROR: division by zero.
As I'm level 0, I can't equip any gear nor assist in any meaningful way in the battle, and I don't get paid regardless of whether I was actually at the battle or not.
Screenshot for evidence below.
Pls fix and give me my money and xp
https://imgur.com/a3fnBKJ
3
cRPG Technical problems / AU server reporting having players when empty
« on: March 26, 2019, 09:42:17 am »
I'm not sure why this happens, but half the time I check the website for how many players are on the Australian server (to gauge whether I want to load it up or not), it reports that there are players online.
I load the game up and there are most certainly not players on the server.
The website continues to report that there are players on the server even after reloading it, doesn't seem to be any rime or reason for it reporting incorrectly.
It does correctly report that the server is empty, but approximately only half the time.
What the f is happening?
PS: I assume this goes without saying, but I do enter the server to check if there's any kind of mistake and there are no players on either team, nor spectating.
I load the game up and there are most certainly not players on the server.
The website continues to report that there are players on the server even after reloading it, doesn't seem to be any rime or reason for it reporting incorrectly.
It does correctly report that the server is empty, but approximately only half the time.
What the f is happening?
PS: I assume this goes without saying, but I do enter the server to check if there's any kind of mistake and there are no players on either team, nor spectating.
4
Game Balance Discussion / Re: Buff Polehammer
« on: March 22, 2019, 01:49:43 pm »
Legit the only reason I was using it 
5
Mercenary Recruitment / Re: Four Battles Tonight! [NA STRATEGUS]
« on: March 21, 2019, 07:10:44 am »
Excellent
6
Game Balance Discussion / Buff Polehammer
« on: March 20, 2019, 11:21:46 am »
Currently using a +3 Polehammer and have bonked quite a few people with it.
It feels awful.
As it stands, there's no redeeming feature for the polehammer.
It has worse damage than you'd think, even if it had decent speed, it takes a LOT of hits to kill someone.
It's closest comparison is the German poleaxe.
Take note that when compared to aforementioned non-overpowered weapon, it does worse swing damage even at high armor values, has considerably worse speed, is (marginally) shorter, does not have bonus vs shield, has a worse stab. Furthermore the German poleaxe's secondary mode is better than both modes of the Polehammer.
The tradeoff for this is that the polehammer can technically knock down opponents. At the time of this post I am on a 20+ hit streak of not knocking any opponents down, at 7 power strike.
Finally the Polehammer only gains +2 damage to each swing at masterwork.
Admittedly at +3, it does 37p in secondary mode, which is reasonably high.
But the Polehammer's pierce mode compared to the Bec De Corbin is garbage.
3 Less speed and 2 less stab damage for 10 length and one swing damage? Yuck.
The only reason to use the Polehammer is for novelty purposes.
It could easily receive any number of buffs to both speed and damage.
Plancion for comparison is a straight upgrade to polehammer and is still weak. Still quite seriously underpowered versus the multitude of cut damage alternatives.
While I've never been a fan of using unbalanced weapons, the two handed warhammer is looking very appealing. That's the kind of speed and damage a top-cost blunt weapon should have, obviously the polehammer would need to have adjusted stats because it isn't unbalanced. But wow, 5 more speed, 1 swing damage, 1 stab damage and an additional 1 swing damage sounds fearsome, maybe even viable.
Cut meta is boring, especially when there's no viable blunt options and only one viable pierce option.
And when the polehammer is compared to said cut polearms like German Poleaxe and Elegant poleaxes, its quite obvious how absolutely garbage this weapon is - weaker swings, slower, worse stab, the list goes on.
Just make it powerful enough to feel good when you've equipped it. Hitting someone 5 times with no knockdown then dying to 3 hits from a faster cut weapon (both users at 55+ body armor) is pretty frustrating. It genuinely feels underpowered and it's always surprising when you actually manage to kill someone with such a weapon that has these horrible stat budgets.
It feels awful.
As it stands, there's no redeeming feature for the polehammer.
It has worse damage than you'd think, even if it had decent speed, it takes a LOT of hits to kill someone.
It's closest comparison is the German poleaxe.
Take note that when compared to aforementioned non-overpowered weapon, it does worse swing damage even at high armor values, has considerably worse speed, is (marginally) shorter, does not have bonus vs shield, has a worse stab. Furthermore the German poleaxe's secondary mode is better than both modes of the Polehammer.
The tradeoff for this is that the polehammer can technically knock down opponents. At the time of this post I am on a 20+ hit streak of not knocking any opponents down, at 7 power strike.
Finally the Polehammer only gains +2 damage to each swing at masterwork.
Admittedly at +3, it does 37p in secondary mode, which is reasonably high.
But the Polehammer's pierce mode compared to the Bec De Corbin is garbage.
3 Less speed and 2 less stab damage for 10 length and one swing damage? Yuck.
The only reason to use the Polehammer is for novelty purposes.
It could easily receive any number of buffs to both speed and damage.
Plancion for comparison is a straight upgrade to polehammer and is still weak. Still quite seriously underpowered versus the multitude of cut damage alternatives.
While I've never been a fan of using unbalanced weapons, the two handed warhammer is looking very appealing. That's the kind of speed and damage a top-cost blunt weapon should have, obviously the polehammer would need to have adjusted stats because it isn't unbalanced. But wow, 5 more speed, 1 swing damage, 1 stab damage and an additional 1 swing damage sounds fearsome, maybe even viable.
Cut meta is boring, especially when there's no viable blunt options and only one viable pierce option.
And when the polehammer is compared to said cut polearms like German Poleaxe and Elegant poleaxes, its quite obvious how absolutely garbage this weapon is - weaker swings, slower, worse stab, the list goes on.
Just make it powerful enough to feel good when you've equipped it. Hitting someone 5 times with no knockdown then dying to 3 hits from a faster cut weapon (both users at 55+ body armor) is pretty frustrating. It genuinely feels underpowered and it's always surprising when you actually manage to kill someone with such a weapon that has these horrible stat budgets.
7
Sell/Trade / Re: Double Thickshake's store of dank weed *Selling loom point*
« on: October 21, 2014, 07:23:42 am »
Got a spathion and charger
hooray
hooray
8
Announcements / Re: 0.4.0.0 - The patch of destiny
« on: October 20, 2014, 09:43:42 am »You can only exchange one per account.But I can go buy some random junk +3 then trade it for a good one?
9
General Discussion / Re: Heirloom exchange - can I exchange a loom I got post patch?
« on: October 20, 2014, 09:04:49 am »Thanks
Yes you can. Noone need to accept anything, and yes, you can go and make money out of it.
It's a totally abusable feature. And what did I do: Change a +3 I don't want for a another +3 I don't really need that much, one thats already in the game since 2010. And I didn't make any money out of it.
I'm doing it wrong ...
Hehe I think what you're doing is just not being cheeky.
10
Announcements / Re: 0.4.0.0 - The patch of destiny
« on: October 20, 2014, 08:38:23 am »
Can I exchange any heirloom I have for any other?
So can I buy a very cheap one right now and exchange it for a very expensive one to make bulk profit?
So can I buy a very cheap one right now and exchange it for a very expensive one to make bulk profit?
11
General Discussion / Heirloom exchange - can I exchange a loom I got post patch?
« on: October 20, 2014, 08:36:23 am »
As the title suggests, I'm a bit confused about how the heirloom exchange works.
I'm wondering whether or not I can go buy a loom then trade it, so can I buy a very cheap heirloom then trade it for a very expensive one?
And does the exchange require someone to accept your exchange, or is it just one item for another?
I'm wondering whether or not I can go buy a loom then trade it, so can I buy a very cheap heirloom then trade it for a very expensive one?
And does the exchange require someone to accept your exchange, or is it just one item for another?
12
Sell/Trade / Re: Double Thickshake's store of dank weed *Buying +3 Charger/Paramerion*
« on: October 20, 2014, 08:34:45 am »
Buying new stuff, hooray
13
Suggestions Corner / Re: Camel ??
« on: October 18, 2014, 01:14:02 pm »AND SOUNDS !!!Pepe you are adorable. I'm afraid I luv you for ever <3
14
Game Balance Discussion / Re: Nerf Agi and Make Ironflesh Useful
« on: October 18, 2014, 05:42:04 am »
You do actually feel very disadvantaged with no IF, whenever I start Q_Qing about being weak despite having 65 armor, I always remember that I'm being a bastard with no IF. When I do get IF, I'm significantly tankier.
I suppose IF its for people like me who do stupid shit and/or can't block very well.
That being said I think it could add a bit of base armor and maybe 3 health per point, it seems significantly weaker than the other skills.
I suppose IF its for people like me who do stupid shit and/or can't block very well.
That being said I think it could add a bit of base armor and maybe 3 health per point, it seems significantly weaker than the other skills.
15
Beginner's Help and Guides / Re: Cavalry build advice
« on: October 18, 2014, 04:56:02 am »
Ahh indeed, luckily there aren't very many lancers in Australia
Yeah the Charger is very pretty, I found Eastern Warhorse was as well but it was too squishy for what I was trying to do, I could avoid most melee dangers but I got shot all the time.
Plus it's harder to murder people by running over them.
Yeah the Charger is very pretty, I found Eastern Warhorse was as well but it was too squishy for what I was trying to do, I could avoid most melee dangers but I got shot all the time.
Plus it's harder to murder people by running over them
.