Messages

91

NA (Community) / How long will my ban last? *Subject to Change*

« on: August 23, 2011, 02:22:01 am »

This is a general outline of how long, if you are indeed banned, your ban may last. If you are a repeat offender it may last up to twice as long.

Bans may be questioned on the Community forum boards, but if you or a friend argue in game or provoke an admin, even if it was a mistake, the ban may be increased by a day or longer.

PLEASE NOTE: Some bans will be handed out after a warning/kick, but not all. Remember, if a player is griefing you, report them to an admin by pressing i. Do not take the law into your own hands.

Exploiting-247 days.

Intentional Team Killing (no warning needed)- 1 week.

Intentional Team Wounding - (no warning needed)1 week.

Obscene Names - 1 Day.

Leeching- 1 Day

Intentional Delaying - 1 Day

92

Game Admin aBooze / Re: Moved.

« on: August 23, 2011, 02:02:53 am »

This should not be something discussed in a public forum.

Donk i will either communicate with you in a private message or text. All other admins can send me a private message where i will try and reply at the next available time.

93

Spam / Re: GET RID OF DONKYLEAPS

« on: August 20, 2011, 08:33:33 pm »

Sorry, but its simple guys. Community Server Admins will warn players of rule breaking or anything considered douche baggery.

You do have the freedom of discussing rules or decisions in a civil manner on this forum board. In game however, when an admin gives you a warning, if you have a dire question, use the i button(to have direct contact to all admins online) to clear any misunderstanding.

However, ignoring the warning or instigating an admin into fighting may result in longer or greater punishment deserved.

94

General Discussion / Re: nuffen: stay or go?

« on: August 20, 2011, 08:24:59 pm »

As much as you troll me, or cause difficulty for amusement, i say stay.

95

Faction Halls / Re: [ATS] Among the Shadows (North American)

« on: August 18, 2011, 03:34:46 am »

Hurr hurr, that explains a lot ;)

We only care about what other ATS think about ATS.

96

Diplomacy / Re: FCC vs Northern Empire

« on: August 16, 2011, 01:04:39 am »

NE mistake was that they wanted to be friendly to all neighboors. Claiming 15+ fiefs and trying to be friendly.
It's much easier to make friends and test each other's loyality having the same enemies and fighting by one side.
As for me I do not believe ppl who are trying to be neutral\friendly to all.

It's not SIMS it's Strategus. Bellum omnium contra omnes

I tried. And I was being honest zaharist. I couldn't have stopped any of this, even if I saw the FCC/LLJK thing coming which we did, I didn't, or rather hoped that Fallen wouldn't come at the same time, and by the time chaos and DRZ jumped in, it was already too late. Ganked.

I'm not quitting strategus. I will be back on the 31st. This is just how the game goes. No hard feelings all around, although i am disappointed at those who lied to me to get where they are.

97

Diplomacy / Re: toilet brb - Official Declaration of Peace

« on: August 15, 2011, 07:40:08 pm »

In no way is Mercs aiding ATS, we sold them a castle is all. I figured i'd be losing it anyways, might as well make a profit before i do.

They've stated to me numerous times they must pay FCC 4500 troops as well, and they plan on keeping their word.


Two separate contracts, and the lines are being blurred.

98

Closed Requests / Re: Unban Request Essay, NA Siege, Cum_Knight_who_says_Ni

« on: August 14, 2011, 09:13:31 pm »

Banned after receiving a warning about using a construction site on siege.

99

Game Admin aBooze / Old

« on: August 14, 2011, 08:39:02 pm »

I will be leaving until the 31st today. The community servers will be in the hands of donkleaps_kgb. He is new to the community, unbiased, and experienced in community management in other games. Though many of you don't know him, I think he's the man for the job. Please respect him, and his decisions.

I think it's time we had a fresh face around and a fresh start for some who have had problems with me. Consider this a free second chance. If you think you're being targeted by me, Donk an I are giving you a chance to remove said target.

Game on, see ya in a couple days.

100

Strategus General Discussion / Re: Battle for Rebache

« on: August 13, 2011, 07:58:08 am »

Rematch with real gear. 

101

Diplomacy / Re: TKoV's Official Declaration of War

« on: August 13, 2011, 07:11:47 am »

Your men of your word. I respect that. Good Luck.

102

Diplomacy / Re: FCC vs Northern Empire

« on: August 12, 2011, 08:33:36 pm »

That being said, Fallen is a big faction on the strat map, as are Hospitallers and our allies.  You'd be a fool not to already be preparing to defend yourselves.  Yeah, I went there! 

You sir...are an idiot.

103

Strategus Issues / Strategus Reinforcement Fail

« on: August 12, 2011, 08:22:29 pm »

So its widely known that once someone is attacked, there are only 4 hours to be reinforced.

Last night, we reinforced Rebache with 2000 troops, but to make sure it was working, we checked the battle to see if the reinforcements were working. We were distressed to find out that the battle still showed only 500 against the attackers instead of 3100.

I stopped sending more troops and any gear, and immediately i tried contacting a dev in irc, but the only one who became available was Espu. He expressed that he had no knowledge of strategus, but that i should submit a bug report.


Originally i was going to cut my loses and accept the fact that i was going to lose the village and everything on it. Including the gold that i can't spend on equipment to defend.

However, it seems that my troops did go through in an unknown amount of time later. However, because of the delayed showing of troop reinforcement, and not really knowing if a bug occurred at the time, those troops are not equipped to prevent a heavier loss.

My question is, is there a delayed reinforcement bug? I suspect that like battle registration for AI, things only update on the hour, which may have messed this up. Just wanted a confirmation or not is all.

104

Diplomacy / Re: FCC vs Northern Empire

« on: August 12, 2011, 08:29:21 am »

ohhhhhhh i get it now. :p lol

I meant FCC, not Chaos

105

Diplomacy / Re: FCC vs Northern Empire

« on: August 12, 2011, 06:40:22 am »

You asked us to not attack. We agreed. Sounds like a deal to me.