61
Sell/Trade / Re: TRADE SELL MW Bec de Corbin
« on: July 23, 2011, 09:17:00 pm »
sent you a pm
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
62
Strategus General Discussion / Re: Sly move, LLJK
« on: July 18, 2011, 04:55:20 am »
it says it right here, in this thread.
63
Suggestions Corner / Re: A New or Alternative North American Strategus Server?
« on: July 15, 2011, 01:47:00 pm »
Hey Gorath, why don't you just give chadz thousands of dollars to pay for another server. This way, AMERICA will have 2 servers, just in case Zealot pulls the plug on his.
I mean, a literal shit load of cash is no big deal right to any of you right? You wouldn't be rage polling Zealots donation if money meant anything to you.
I mean, a literal shit load of cash is no big deal right to any of you right? You wouldn't be rage polling Zealots donation if money meant anything to you.
64
Suggestions Corner / Re: A New or Alternative North American Strategus Server?
« on: July 15, 2011, 02:04:10 am »
Yes, I'm east coast and ping way better to Texas than to wherever the other servers are.
66
General Discussion / Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
« on: July 14, 2011, 07:15:36 pm »
CAPS LOCK LOL
67
Strategus General Discussion / Re: Old strat is back
« on: July 12, 2011, 09:31:35 pm »
first day
68
Announcements / Re: Strategus update
« on: July 12, 2011, 09:24:02 pm »
to test the increasing load on the server, keys have been given into circulation, ask someone who has one to get into it.
I did read it. You would probably get a lot less grief if you were less cryptic about how to get a key though. Ask someone who has one to get in? Are we supposed to hang out in irc and spam for keys?
69
Announcements / Re: Strategus update
« on: July 12, 2011, 09:20:04 pm »
Seriously? Why not just... give everybody a key so they can play your game.
70
Strategus General Discussion / Re: Old strat is back
« on: July 12, 2011, 09:16:31 pm »Why wouldn't you join? Even if it's slated for a wipe, it's a) valuable testing b) a useful dry run for your clan c) fun!
Why the hell would you make people hang out in irc to play strat.
Hey guys, come playtest our new strat, except you aren't allowed unless you sit in IRC and beg for keys. Also, we're going to be really cryptic about it and troll everybody all the time.
71
General Discussion / Great Patch
« on: July 12, 2011, 04:40:54 am »
Seriously. Figured I'd throw this up so you know not everyone thinks the sky is falling.
Now release Strategus. Thanks.
Now release Strategus. Thanks.
72
Sell/Trade / [TRADE] Mighty Warhammer
« on: July 08, 2011, 09:05:51 pm »
Looking for masterwork knightly arming sword, masterwork elite scimitar, or masterwork arabian cav
73
General Discussion / Re: Voice packs - additions and reminder
« on: July 06, 2011, 03:40:18 pm »
I remapped q to free cam since this is 10000 times more important than voice commands. So now for me it's ~,M,V
74
Game Balance Discussion / Re: how to truely balance cavalry
« on: July 04, 2011, 11:31:00 pm »
Why do I receive damage when I am run over by a horse, but a horse does not receive damage when it slams into a wall going full speed?
I dislike cav as much as the next guy, but seriously the majority of cav are crappy players who couldn't couch an afk to save their multiplier, so it's not really a big deal.
I think if the game balanced teams based on class, there would be less complaining about cav and archer spam. It's only when one team has an overwhelming amount of cav that I start to see a problem. If both teams autobalanced after the first round based on class, and both teams received equal numbers of cav, archers, and shielders, I think we'd see a much more balanced and fun battle.
I dislike cav as much as the next guy, but seriously the majority of cav are crappy players who couldn't couch an afk to save their multiplier, so it's not really a big deal.
I think if the game balanced teams based on class, there would be less complaining about cav and archer spam. It's only when one team has an overwhelming amount of cav that I start to see a problem. If both teams autobalanced after the first round based on class, and both teams received equal numbers of cav, archers, and shielders, I think we'd see a much more balanced and fun battle.
75
Announcements / Re: IMPORTANT: Recent hackings
« on: July 04, 2011, 11:17:03 pm »
I just got temp banned from SA for trolling in the cRPG thread. 