31
General Off Topic / Re: Kalam in EU
« on: February 19, 2016, 04:09:51 pm »
And maybe you will have the chance to witness some traditional Turk fireworks! 
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
32
General Off Topic / Re: If our forum personas were celebrities
« on: February 18, 2016, 02:52:00 pm »
Kafein:
(click to show/hide)
33
General Off Topic / Re: Friendzone cringe
« on: February 17, 2016, 02:30:41 pm »
I really dont get why not only they get "abused" by this grils but they need to show it publicly on social media, can you not just do it by private msg??? 
34
General Discussion / Re: hmm
« on: February 15, 2016, 01:35:36 pm »Thats bread.Don't get fooled by eastern european talents http://www.czechcookbook.com/european-potato-bread-domaci-chleb/
35
General Discussion / Re: A Tribute to Zlotz
« on: February 12, 2016, 02:45:12 pm »
Ban enceinte_a_14_ans killed me. translation: "Ban fourteen and pregnant"
38
Game Admin Feedback / Re: [EU] Uthyr Pendraeg
« on: February 08, 2016, 11:13:33 pm »
May remind you of some Turkish unban thread (or that chocolate chip cookie guy I forgot the name), I am sorry for that.
(click to show/hide)
39
General Off Topic / Re: Google made it's choice
« on: February 01, 2016, 01:55:20 pm »
Luckily this phenomena never occurs on this forum! 
40
Spam / Re: Remove Admin (Tamra)
« on: January 30, 2016, 07:06:56 pm »
Wow this post was surprisingly more fun that what I expected! First the solid defence from Yasutay, then this gold from panos:
P.s: Not sure ayanoob is a woman tho, a french certainly but that to say a woman...
DO NOT + MY POST YOU GYPSIE TURK, I AM NOT TAKING YOUR SIDE, SHE DID GOOD THAT SHE KICKED YOU, BECAUSE YOU DESERVE IT FOR BEING A TURK..10/10 would read again.
P.s: Not sure ayanoob is a woman tho, a french certainly but that to say a woman...
41
General Off Topic / Re: Global warming, more like global hoax.
« on: January 27, 2016, 04:28:07 pm »There is no "good science" any more since Science is a business as everything else.The thing is one scientist or one scientist lab in itself means nothing, all he creates must be taken cautiously. The thing that makes science reliable is the debate inside of the scientific community. Is the result replicable? Can another team disprof what has been said? Is everything stated agreed by everyone inside the community (or by most of it)?
It probably used to be different a few decades or a century back but nowadays statistics are abused to show what you wanna show which isn't necessarily an image of the objective reality.
The problem is that general media don't wait for the scientific debate to take place. As soon as some results are published, they will go "science say that". But that is not the truth, it should more be like "this lab is saying that. We will see in some years if the scientific community agrees on this".
...that said, I and a lots of people in the scientific community agree that there's a drop in the quality of scientific production. Lots of publishing just to have citations and credits but not enough time spend on each research.
....and we know for sure that methane is more than one order of magnitude more powerful than CO2. The only reasonable thing to do on a human scale to stop global warming and be more healthy is to stop or severely reduce meat consumption.
Do people really think that scientists working for educational institutions have more of a financial agenda than corporations making trillions from their ravaging of the planet?Couldn't say those better.
Are people that fucking retarded to think that only a little over 200 years of heavy industry is having a massive impact in a system as big as our planet?You know about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_depletion right?
Maybe some people tend to be too dramatic about it, but climate change is real. Even if climate change have occurred before humans were there, the effects were dramatic, Glacial age were not fun time for living creatures. To what degree human are affecting it is still in debate but there's quite a lot of proof that we do have an effect and reducing it can only make things better.
If there is one thing that pisses me off it's the preserve the rainforest bullshit, Eurasians wiped out the vast majority of their forests and built shit there, then go off crying how the people in Brazil shouldn't be allowed to do the same, if you want forests, go get rid of some of your cities or farms and plant shit there.What if we just wanted to avoid that they do the same mistake? Plus the situation is quite different as they have way more wildlife diversity as we never had and that they have a tropical soil which after some years without tropical forest becomes infertile. So in one generation the destruction of the forest will have been useless.
Scientists also have their own agendas. If they come up with something 'relevant' that will spark a lot of attention and is to do with the current issue then they will likely get more funding, advance their own career ect.Destroying other scientist theories also bring lot of fame and reward for scientists too, if some scientists could have debunked the global warning they would already have done it. And I don't think governement are spending so much money to make everything greener if some scientist could provide them proof global warming is a hoax.
So just because scientists agree, doesn't mean they aren't bullshitting or stretching the truth to some extent to suit their own needs in life.
42
General Off Topic / Re: Bernie Sanders is a Trojan Marxist Horse for Young Naive Liberals
« on: January 27, 2016, 02:00:19 pm »
haha reading your post I was guessing you were retard...but that much?!? 
44
General Off Topic / Re: Forums dying?
« on: January 24, 2016, 11:29:53 pm »
Meanwhile in Ukraine thread has been inactive for months now... there's no clearer sign of the incoming apocalypse for this forum.
45