Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Rest_in_Peace

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13] 14
181
EU (Official) / Re: Time of Ban
« on: May 09, 2016, 08:32:49 pm »
Hobo is a huge cunt and sucks big juicy dicks

also unban Norr plz

182
EU (Official) / Re: Ban these filths out of the server
« on: May 08, 2016, 02:36:12 pm »
 :lol: :lol: :lol:

183
General Discussion / Re: [THEMED BATTLE] PRIZES - VERY IMPORTANT
« on: April 25, 2016, 08:46:50 pm »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Schoi forced me to post this

184
General Discussion / Re: [THEMED BATTLE] PRIZES - VERY IMPORTANT
« on: April 24, 2016, 02:21:51 pm »
Rest_in_Peace
Crusader_Rest_in_Peace

185
hi hail

186
Strategus General Discussion / Re: [EU] War Room
« on: April 07, 2016, 05:27:27 pm »
Well it was fun while it lasted :rolleyes:

188
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

189
Strategus General Discussion / Re: [EU] War Room
« on: April 05, 2016, 11:23:33 am »
Well, yes they do have quite some good archers that certainly have some impact on the battles, but I don't think thats why you guys lose alot of battles.

I fought for both the UIF and the Northern Alliance and the UIF is just far more organized. If only half of the people listens to the commands of the commander and the other half just charges in like some braindead squirrel then of course you are going to lose battles.

For example, this battle - http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusbattlesarchive#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=1009
You guys had better gear, more people in the rosters and yet you guys lost really hard and even retreated when there were like 900 troops left. What even happened?

If I could I would've signed for the underdog in the castle battle today but im banned (again) for 2 weeks :lol:

190
Strategus General Discussion / Re: [EU] War Room
« on: April 04, 2016, 11:51:40 pm »
rip EU strat :cry:

192
I could be commander for the Crusaders if no one wants to be commander. Im pretty shit at commanding though so ye.

193
Game Admin Feedback / Re: [EU] Austrian
« on: March 29, 2016, 04:41:14 pm »
I still think it was unnecessary to ban me for 1 day for something that caused no harm to anyone on the server. Its not like I had the intention to doublespawn.

194
Game Admin Feedback / Re: [EU] Austrian
« on: March 29, 2016, 04:09:31 pm »
Should've been a 2/4 hour ban instead of a 1 day ban. I don't think you would ban your own clanmates for 1 day if they had done the same as I did.

195
Game Admin Feedback / Re: [EU] Austrian
« on: March 29, 2016, 03:07:28 pm »
So this admin banned me a couple of hours ago for double spawning while it actually wasn't my intention to double spawn. I died very early in the round with a shit K/D and as I always do I decided to rejoin like the huge bundle of sticks I am because I care about my K/D. I joined the server and accidentally double spawned.

I typed in chat "oops" and got killed without me resisting. I also didnt do any damage to other players and going to spectator wasn't an option too because I care too much about my kd. After I died I tried to explain to him that I didn't double spawn on purpose but it seems like he just straight away banned me.

The ban was unnecessary and way too harsh as no one besides Austri complained or got butthurt about the fact I accidentally doublespawned.


Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13] 14