cRPG
cRPG => Suggestions Corner => Game Balance Discussion => Topic started by: Matey on July 08, 2011, 04:39:28 am
-
How about rather than 50% which hurts people more depending on how much xp they have... we do it like... 50% of XP OR 5mil xp or some other fairly big number. i think it sucks those who have decided to forgo looms and just keep playing their char to have to give up half their xp to respec when they have already given up a heirloom to restart. some of these guys on the top 25 list have 50+ mil xp... 25+ mil xp to respec? thats like 150 hours of game play gone and they dont get an heirloom or an xp boost. if some of these guys with 100mil xp choose to spend 5mil respecing every week or two, i say let em, they arent getting any heirlooms doing it so why not?
-
Anyone who has grinded that much has planned not to retire or change their build anyway. THATS THE JOKE
-
+1
oh right, i can plus ya up there : D
-
Anyone who has grinded that much has planned not to retire or change their build anyway. THATS THE JOKE
anyone up there planned at one point not to retire or change their build anyway, but i bet a lot of em would love to respec eventually... without having to throw away 100s of hours of play time.
-
anyone up there planned at one point not to retire or change their build anyway, but i bet a lot of em would love to respec eventually... without having to throw away 100s of hours of play time.
ask guys with pt
-
I know if they follow through with 30% reduction in shoot speed that archers will finally be utterly useless (near useless now in most cases) and the only way to go is strength build bec/long spear tin can spammer or cav lancer. Most of these people never planned to retire or respec, true, but then their entire class gets enrfed to oblivion adn becomes useless, seems an asshole move to then tell them that they should have kept retiring because if you level 32 a respec sends you back to 31, if you are 31 you go back to 30, etc, and unlike retiring you lose hundreds of hours of playing.