cRPG

cRPG => General Discussion => Topic started by: nikklenikkle on October 18, 2018, 05:55:35 am

Title: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: nikklenikkle on October 18, 2018, 05:55:35 am
saying the N word gets you muted/kicked, probably because its not inclusive blah blah blah, yet making fun of narmins ethnicity, religion, race etc etc is fine? I get how narmins toxic but if some black guy came on and was toxic too, I'd imagine calling him the N word would still result in a mute or kick. all this shows is how the admins don't really give a shit. When people say the N word its generally without context and just fucking around yet when people make fun of narmins religion, ethnicity, country etc etc Its targeted and specificly made to offend him.

For the record I don't really care, neither does narmin, I think you should be allowed to say whatever you want, its just stupid how the admins blatantly turn a blind eye and sometimes join in on the remarks. If you really care about censorship and making crpg more inclusive, you should censor it all.

Lastly for anyone that wants to chime in, id urge/ask you try to look at this in the bigger picture. As I said above, if someone black came on and was constantly trash talking etc etc would it be ok to call him the N word? I'd imagine the answer would be no (at least according to the admins who enforce this rule).

Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: bensai on October 18, 2018, 05:59:20 am
or just censor nothing and let people make their own decisions verbally and deal with the eSocial eRepercussions
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: MercerTheSwellGuy on October 18, 2018, 06:00:45 am
or just censor nothing and let people make their own decisions verbally and deal with the eSocial eRepercussions
^ this please this why cant everything be this
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: kasMVC on October 18, 2018, 06:03:39 am
or you could live your life nigga
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: nikklenikkle on October 18, 2018, 06:06:01 am
or just censor nothing and let people make their own decisions verbally and deal with the eSocial eRepercussions
ya thats what i want lmao. but the ruleset is hypocritical so im pointing it out
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Asheram on October 18, 2018, 06:10:51 am
wow so your buddy got picked on who picks on others here and now it should be ok to say whatever you want because you are just "fooling around" got it. You dont and wont get away with that shit in GK TDM why expect it here? I do think GK is a bit more rounded (by this I mean its not just the n word but any "discrimination") on this issue but you still dont say the words
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Meli on October 18, 2018, 06:13:26 am
wow so your buddy got picked on who picks on others here and now it should be ok to say whatever you want because you are just "fooling around" got it.

That isn't the point. The point is that the admins are being inconsistent with the enforcement of the rules. Either censor all forms of harassing words, or don't censor at all.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: nikklenikkle on October 18, 2018, 06:14:02 am
ya what he said
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Asheram on October 18, 2018, 06:15:14 am
That isn't the point. The point is that the admins are being inconsistent with the enforcement of the rules. Either censor all forms of harassing words, or don't censor at all.
sry i edited too late
(by this I mean its not just the n word but any "discrimination")

edit-  I also think Narmin earned his hate here as well
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Phoenix on October 18, 2018, 06:18:21 am
as-salamu alaykum
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Morris on October 18, 2018, 07:05:51 am
let me just i say i don't really care, but i'm going to whine about it in game as well as make an entire thread on the forum about it
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: kasMVC on October 18, 2018, 07:10:07 am
"i dont really care but youre infringing on my god given americna right to say friend" "muh discrimination"
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: nikklenikkle on October 18, 2018, 07:34:36 am
thank u for ur informative posts we will be sure to take ur well crafted arguments into account
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: grimsight on October 18, 2018, 07:49:37 am
muting for profanity is terrible for the sole reason that I don't need people with no sense of humor to be shield me from bad words
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: chesterotab on October 18, 2018, 08:00:31 am
it's hard to understand what the argument is here other than that admins should stop muting people at all. Give some examples of specific admins muting specific players over specific instances and we can better judge things on a case by case basis. Even if a muting is retroactively judged as unjust, so what?

If you act like trash in chat, you should expect to be treated as such.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Morris on October 18, 2018, 08:29:34 am
thank u for ur informative posts we will be sure to take ur well crafted arguments into account
fuck off. what a bunch of whiny retards. your post makes zero sense. it's like you're trying to say two different things. first, you whine about how hypocritical it is that ppl get muted for dropping n bombs but not for making fun or narmin's race or religion. if you're trying to say that the ppl making fun of your boyfriend should be muted, then i guess you have a point because it's against the server rules.
(click to show/hide)
however, this is clearly not the case because you then say that everybody should be free to say whatever they want without getting muted. it's obvious that you're just assblasted about getting muted for dropping n bombs. i can say with confidence that i alone have dropped more n bombs than you and your boyfriends combined. everybody fucking hates you. is it really that surprising that no one is willing to come to your defense?
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: grimsight on October 18, 2018, 09:10:34 am
it's hard to understand what the argument is here other than that admins should stop muting people at all. Give some examples of specific admins muting specific players over specific instances and we can better judge things on a case by base basis. Even if a muting is retroactively judged as unjust, so what?

If you act like trash in chat, you should expect to be treated as such.

opinion from my experience as the head admin of the native battle server, from running many 200 man events for years in NW, and my observations watching other admins.

The most trouble I ever see from trolls and edge lords is when admins rule with an iron fist. The more an admin flexes their power the more a subset of players will be taking up arms against them. In the end you might end up muting or banning half a dozen or more players.

Practically speaking: I would let 1 player slur occasionally, rather than mute/ban them immediately and then subsequently have to do the same to another half dozen players taking up arms out of spite. Almost every time I see rampant flaming/racism/whatever on GK TDM, it is because an admin was too quick with the punishments. 

In my admin experience, letting players express themselves how they wish is the best way to keep things under control. The occasional slur will be thrown out, and luckily we are all grown adults so we can handle that, and personally judge the character of the offender as we see fit. Admins are not needed until it is truly obnoxious and out of control, which I find rarely happens if you let players do what they want.

Maybe you cRPG admins are so vindictive that you feel you MUST immediately punish bad behavior. That's your prerogative. You'll end up punishing a lot more players that way, not all of whom are bad people.

in other news:

god hates long mauls
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: bensai on October 18, 2018, 09:30:23 am
(click to show/hide)

what do you mean when you say "YOU cRPG admins" we are all not warband players here huh? maybe you should go back to the east where u belong and leave the proud west to the cRPG race??
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: chesterotab on October 18, 2018, 09:44:17 am

Maybe you cRPG admins are so vindictive that you feel you MUST immediately punish bad behavior. That's your prerogative. You'll end up punishing a lot more players that way, not all of whom are bad people.

in other news:

god hates long mauls

I do appreciate you sharing your stance on the matter, but your post has the same problem as nikkle's, a lack of concrete examples. You say "you cRPG admins" without saying which admins are doing what. The reason this is an issue is because I virtually never mute for chat abuse unless i'm essentially forced to by complaints in admin chat. I haven't muted anyone in the last week or two and from what I have seen, the pejorative chat SPAM has been even worse than it has been in the past.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Panos_ on October 18, 2018, 10:17:40 am
ITS OK TO BE RACIST, UNLESS YOURE WHITE.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Tristan_of_Erzoth on October 18, 2018, 11:19:00 am
Well Assington once got banned by James for making fun of muslims so it has happened before. I didn't even know Narmin still played tho tbh.



Also, kids these days weren't even around during the great ban exodus of desire a strat or two ago. This actually IS lightening of the ruleset compared to the past.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: bensai on October 18, 2018, 11:45:47 am
Well Assington once got banned by James for making fun of muslims so it has happened before. I didn't even know Narmin still played tho tbh.



Also, kids these days weren't even around during the great ban exodus of desire a strat or two ago. This actually IS lightening of the ruleset compared to the past.

(click to show/hide)

actually that was sugar

you also once banned me after sugar TK'd you
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: njames89 on October 18, 2018, 12:55:03 pm
Sugar Assington, basically the same person.

See Papi Cochese incident / the meme banishment to exile island.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Good times.

As for people being cancerous to Narmin if it crosses the line then that is also bannable.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Rando on October 18, 2018, 01:17:40 pm
saying the N word gets you muted/kicked, probably because its not inclusive blah blah blah, yet making fun of narmins ethnicity, religion, race etc etc is fine? I get how narmins toxic but if some black guy came on and was toxic too, I'd imagine calling him the N word would still result in a mute or kick. all this shows is how the admins don't really give a shit. When people say the N word its generally without context and just fucking around yet when people make fun of narmins religion, ethnicity, country etc etc Its targeted and specificly made to offend him.

For the record I don't really care, neither does narmin, I think you should be allowed to say whatever you want, its just stupid how the admins blatantly turn a blind eye and sometimes join in on the remarks. If you really care about censorship and making crpg more inclusive, you should censor it all.

Lastly for anyone that wants to chime in, id urge/ask you try to look at this in the bigger picture. As I said above, if someone black came on and was constantly trash talking etc etc would it be ok to call him the N word? I'd imagine the answer would be no (at least according to the admins who enforce this rule).

Yeah the enforcement on this is highly retarded. friends shouldn't get special treatment & protection. It's easy to tilt morons with the "N" word which is part of why it's so hilarious, but the idea that I can get away with saying something FAR more offensive simply because it's not a "racial slur" is also hilarious. The same admins that will mute you within a second of saying any racial slur will just outright ignore someone saying they're going to kill your family and then peel off your skin and pour salt on it (not an exagerration, btw). Don't expect any change, the admins who actually call the shots in this mod are just NPCs.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Tristan_of_Erzoth on October 18, 2018, 01:24:00 pm
actually that was sugar

you also once banned me after sugar TK'd you

I keep telling you, Sugar isnt real man. Take the medicine, its there to help
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: njames89 on October 18, 2018, 01:38:40 pm
the admins who actually call the shots in this mod are just NPCs.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: bensai on October 18, 2018, 02:21:35 pm
I keep telling you, Sugar isnt real man. Take the medicine, its there to help

you say that but sugar deserves elevation to holy prophet status. he literally died on the internet so the rest of us could be reborn. with his sacrifice, i, and many others, found revelation and are becoming new people

if you ever besmirch sugar like that again tristan.... well

ill pray for you /...
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Jacaroma on October 18, 2018, 04:40:56 pm
Hey Friends
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: nikklenikkle on October 18, 2018, 05:20:15 pm
let me just i say i don't really care, but i'm going to whine about it in game as well as make an entire thread on the forum about it
What Im trying to say is that I care about the admins being consistent in their rules. So I'm pointing it out. I don't care about people making fun of narmin or saying the N word. Whatever the rule is, the admins should be consistent in enforcing it.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: nikklenikkle on October 18, 2018, 05:26:44 pm
fuck off. what a bunch of whiny retards. your post makes zero sense. it's like you're trying to say two different things. first, you whine about how hypocritical it is that ppl get muted for dropping n bombs but not for making fun or narmin's race or religion. if you're trying to say that the ppl making fun of your boyfriend should be muted, then i guess you have a point because it's against the server rules.
(click to show/hide)
however, this is clearly not the case because you then say that everybody should be free to say whatever they want without getting muted. it's obvious that you're just assblasted about getting muted for dropping n bombs. i can say with confidence that i alone have dropped more n bombs than you and your boyfriends combined. everybody fucking hates you. is it really that surprising that no one is willing to come to your defense?
lmao chill. Im saying that the admins are inconsistent in enforcing there rules. When I said that everyone should be free to say whatever they want that was me saying my opinion. My opinion on what should be done is not happening so I think the admins should be consistent in there rules, and not turn a blind eye to other, equally as bad, racist remarks.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Asheram on October 18, 2018, 05:43:31 pm
opinion from my experience as the head admin of the native battle server, from running many 200 man events for years in NW, and my observations watching other admins.

The most trouble I ever see from trolls and edge lords is when admins rule with an iron fist. The more an admin flexes their power the more a subset of players will be taking up arms against them. In the end you might end up muting or banning half a dozen or more players.

Practically speaking: I would let 1 player slur occasionally, rather than mute/ban them immediately and then subsequently have to do the same to another half dozen players taking up arms out of spite. Almost every time I see rampant flaming/racism/whatever on GK TDM, it is because an admin was too quick with the punishments. 

In my admin experience, letting players express themselves how they wish is the best way to keep things under control. The occasional slur will be thrown out, and luckily we are all grown adults so we can handle that, and personally judge the character of the offender as we see fit. Admins are not needed until it is truly obnoxious and out of control, which I find rarely happens if you let players do what they want.

Maybe you cRPG admins are so vindictive that you feel you MUST immediately punish bad behavior. That's your prerogative. You'll end up punishing a lot more players that way, not all of whom are bad people.

in other news:

god hates long mauls
And yet the native na battle server is dead most of the time and when it isnt it usually devolves into people tk in spawn intentionally and dies off.
The only decent na battle server was Ronin.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: _uwu_ on October 18, 2018, 05:48:38 pm
the way rules are enforced in this mod are fucked up anyways. one can get instantly muted and then banned for dropping n bombs, but won't get banned for excessive twing and tking. i'm living proof of this, as sometimes when admins are on i purposely tw and tk people in order to see if i'll get banned. the worst thing thats ever happened to me was that i got kicked by zeus. the fact that i can actually ruin the game for those around me and get off virtually scot-free while dropping a few n bombs will get me banned with ease is truly fucked
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Asheram on October 18, 2018, 05:58:50 pm
That doesnt seem to get you kicked/banned on na battle server either uwu. Tsb Ruth, Manry and a few more were repeatedly tk in spawn every round til the server died.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Meli on October 18, 2018, 06:05:10 pm
it's hard to understand what the argument is here other than that admins should stop muting people at all. Give some examples of specific admins muting specific players over specific instances and we can better judge things on a case by case basis. Even if a muting is retroactively judged as unjust, so what?

If you act like trash in chat, you should expect to be treated as such.

The problem is that the rules are being enforced inconsistently. All that nikkle is saying is that if people are going to be punished for saying the n word, then why would people not be punished for also using slurs against narmin? Also, narmin is simply a good example, he couldn't care less about the insults. Another example could be somebody like duckie who gets shit talked daily (I am fully aware that duckie is toxic as well, but the point still stands). If the admins actually cared about discriminatory language, they would censor all forms of it, not just one word.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Grytviken on October 18, 2018, 06:10:39 pm
I'm all for a Christian server where all forms of cussing are taken equally as serious, with mutes, followed by kicks, then 1 hour bans.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Thryn on October 18, 2018, 07:01:27 pm
the rule isn't hypocritical, the enforcement is hypocritical. admins are expected to mute as per the rules (No abuse of in-game chat (racism, insulting, griefing, spamming...)) for all offenses. however, if this is done, sometimes what grimsight says happens and the server erupts in "civil disobedience," leading to more mutes and bans which is a situation no one is happy about. i've also been one of the "muh freedom of speech" guys who, on principle, would have these rules tossed. but seriously, is this not a thread based on who accrues more points on the victim scale? you're upset because admins mute on their own discretion and friend is higher than muslim on the offensive chart? in our society we can argue about how all offensive remarks should be held on the same pedestal, but in reality "friend" is the higher than all other insults for obvious reasons. because of this, people are more inclined to use it to be offensive because the word is just that: more offensive than other words. given this fact, i think it's understandable why there is a difference in punishment between the two words, kind of like how 2 tws are treated differently than 2 tks.

since you also brought up narmin, people give him shit because he's a complete retard who deserves to get shittalked for the amount of mindless garbage he spews in the server. he's a bad example to use because he himself should be muted as per the rules because of how toxic he is. ***disclaimer*** narmin does not shittalk, for imo shittalk must rely on some level of banter in order to be affable (i.e. GOBBLINKING personality), where as narmin insults people.

at the end of the day, the rules aren't going to change and everyone that decides to break the rules should at lease be man enough to take the punishment. if your rule breaking goes unpunished, consider yourself lucky.

as someone who has admin and lacks a personal mute button, i can totally understand why some people get muted more than others.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Yeldur on October 18, 2018, 07:09:22 pm
narmin

more like

NARBLOX


AAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: _uwu_ on October 18, 2018, 07:17:19 pm
narmin

more like

NARBLOX


AAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA



AHHHHHHHHHHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAAHHAAHAHAHAHAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAAHAH

N A R B L O X

AHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHAHHAAAHHAHA
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: grimsight on October 18, 2018, 07:50:56 pm
And yet the native na battle server is dead most of the time and when it isnt it usually devolves into people tk in spawn intentionally and dies off.
The only decent na battle server was Ronin.

NA battle was dead for a time because the Ronin admins killed it. This isn't exaggeration, they ruled too strictly and banned many well known players and inevitably killed their own community, as no one wants to play when their friends are banned.

Now NA battle is alive once again. There was no battle server up until a few months ago, when I came back to gaming and put up a server. You can regularly find 20-30 people on in the evenings.

If it "usually" devolves into tks in spawn I invite you to let me know when it happened so I can check the logs.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: njames89 on October 18, 2018, 08:02:32 pm
Honestly more than anything I think its just a grey area what people find offensive. I have definitely muted a lot of people for saying offensive stuff about muslims as well as various other ethnicities/religions.

If something is bothering you report it in I chat. If its not getting dealt with screenshot and ban thread. Admins aren't perfect and aren't paid to do the job but we do as best as we can and will make an effort to watch out for other slurs as you have pointed out.

As for narmin he definitely invites a lot of shit talking his way with the various terrible opinions he espouses every time he is online. Doesn't mean he deserves racial hatred, but hes most definitely a cunt.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Asheram on October 18, 2018, 08:03:49 pm
Yeah I got on native a few days when crpg was dead planning to gk tdm and saw 30 ppl on battle so I went there. The very first rounds had Tsb Ruth, Manry and a few others repeatedly spwn killing. They killed me and a bunch of others then started saying I was tk in spawn and they ban polled me and I was kicked for no fkn reason. So I went and played gk tdm and 5-10 minutes later they showed up there spewing the same crap. I went to check battle pop and it was 8 down from 30 in 5 minutes.
I always prefer battle over tdm or seige but I wont be visiting na battle anymore.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Grytviken on October 18, 2018, 08:08:51 pm
Yeah I got on native a few days when crpg was dead planning to gk tdm and saw 30 ppl on battle so I went there. The very first rounds had Tsb Ruth, Manry and a few others repeatedly spwn killing. They killed me and a bunch of others then started saying I was tk in spawn and they ban polled me and I was kicked for no fkn reason.

sounds like you got owned asheram
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Meli on October 18, 2018, 08:08:56 pm
the rule isn't hypocritical, the enforcement is hypocritical. admins are expected to mute as per the rules (No abuse of in-game chat (racism, insulting, griefing, spamming...)) for all offenses. however, if this is done, sometimes what grimsight says happens and the server erupts in "civil disobedience," leading to more mutes and bans which is a situation no one is happy about. i've also been one of the "muh freedom of speech" guys who, on principle, would have these rules tossed. but seriously, is this not a thread based on who accrues more points on the victim scale? you're upset because admins mute on their own discretion and friend is higher than muslim on the offensive chart? in our society we can argue about how all offensive remarks should be held on the same pedestal, but in reality "friend" is the higher than all other insults for obvious reasons. because of this, people are more inclined to use it to be offensive because the word is just that: more offensive than other words. given this fact, i think it's understandable why there is a difference in punishment between the two words, kind of like how 2 tws are treated differently than 2 tks.

since you also brought up narmin, people give him shit because he's a complete retard who deserves to get shittalked for the amount of mindless garbage he spews in the server. he's a bad example to use because he himself should be muted as per the rules because of how toxic he is. ***disclaimer*** narmin does not shittalk, for imo shittalk must rely on some level of banter in order to be affable (i.e. GOBBLINKING personality), where as narmin insults people.

at the end of the day, the rules aren't going to change and everyone that decides to break the rules should at lease be man enough to take the punishment. if your rule breaking goes unpunished, consider yourself lucky.

as someone who has admin and lacks a personal mute button, i can totally understand why some people get muted more than others.

It's always fascinating to find someone who can talk so much but say so little. This thread is about consistency of rule enforcement, not some 6d commentary on the state of free speech in our society, nor is it about who has more points on the victim scale. We've already stated multiple times that we don't personally care about insults directed towards narmin, but are instead confused as to why rules are being inconsistently enforced in regards to discriminatory language.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Grytviken on October 18, 2018, 08:11:56 pm
It's always fascinating to find someone who can talk so much but say so little. This thread is about consistency of rule enforcement, not some 6d commentary on the state of free speech in our society, nor is it about who has more points on the victim scale. We've already stated multiple times that we don't personally care about insults directed towards narmin, but are instead confused as to why rules are being inconsistently enforced in regards to discriminatory language.

Don't worry. Once I get admin I will mute for F-Words and N-Words.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: chesterotab on October 18, 2018, 08:17:00 pm
Still we come to the issue of lacking real examples. I don't doubt you guys when you say someone gave Narmin a dose of innapropriate chat toxicity and some admin ignored it. Let's fill in the "someone" and "some admin" with real names, couple it with a date and time so the logs can be parsed, and start getting somewhere. Without tangible information all this thread can amount to is a long winded way to say "I think the admins are doing a bad job".
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Asheram on October 18, 2018, 08:18:27 pm
sounds like you got owned asheram
I never even got the chance to play so I guess you are right.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: njames89 on October 18, 2018, 08:19:23 pm
 Bet it was that James guy tbh absolute shitmin. Word on the street is he never got his grade 10, probably redlines his little brain just to pull off those derpy spin moves.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: grimsight on October 18, 2018, 08:28:16 pm
Yeah I got on native a few days when crpg was dead planning to gk tdm and saw 30 ppl on battle so I went there. The very first rounds had Tsb Ruth, Manry and a few others repeatedly spwn killing. They killed me and a bunch of others then started saying I was tk in spawn and they ban polled me and I was kicked for no fkn reason. So I went and played gk tdm and 5-10 minutes later they showed up there spewing the same crap. I went to check battle pop and it was 8 down from 30 in 5 minutes.
I always prefer battle over tdm or seige but I wont be visiting na battle anymore.

The night you're referring to has already been dealt with. The server died after you left because I arrived and banned multiple team killers, including some regulars.

I'm very sorry you had to endure such an ordeal. Hopefully in time you will be able to move on from the trauma that is Warband teamkilling.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: njames89 on October 18, 2018, 08:32:39 pm
Hopefully in time you will be able to move on from the trauma that is Warband teamkilling.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: nikklenikkle on October 18, 2018, 08:40:50 pm
Chester ur missing the entire point. Its not about people that make fun of narmin its about the inconsistency of the admins enforcing this rule. Admins appear to not care about the context of whats going on at all, an example is last night, as morris kindly mentioned, I said something ingame along the lines of "why is it people can make fun of narmins religion/culture and not get muted, yet when someone says friend they instantly get muted." and lo and behold I got muted for saying friend. I obviously had no malicious intent yet this doesn't appear to matter to admins. Yet when people say wayyy more offensive things such as explicitly making fun of Duckies fairly obviously social problems, narmins race/religion, 911, peoples weight and more its fine.

as stated many times I'm not trying to play the victim card or whatever the fuck u guys think im doing, all I care about is the consistency    of admins enforcing rules.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: MercerTheSwellGuy on October 18, 2018, 08:54:41 pm
Don't worry. Once I get admin I will mute for F-Words and N-Words.
Did you even read what he said or are you trying to sound stupid on purpose? "Maybe if I say something 'funny' I'll get likes even though it has nothing to do with the conversation at all and no one finds it funny."
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: chesterotab on October 18, 2018, 09:00:18 pm
Ok so the thread unironically is "I think the admins are doing a bad job, but please be more consistently bad"
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Asheram on October 18, 2018, 09:03:43 pm
So whats the conversation again, dont be rascist against a muslim who names himself after a shitty terrorist organizationn?
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: nikklenikkle on October 18, 2018, 09:07:20 pm
its literally about being consistent in rule enforcement what am i saying thats so confusing
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: chesterotab on October 18, 2018, 09:25:29 pm
Ok well if the whole point is just a recommendation for the entire admin team to be truly consistent in how they deal with the broad issue of in game chat racism (and verbal abuse?) I would say your recommendation is unreasonable to expect and more than a little bit naive.

In game administration amounts to little more than in the moment judgement calls that each individual admin makes in an effort to keep people playing while following the basic rules. It will always be case by case, there will never be actual consistency. Remember, admins are just as dumb as you are.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Morris on October 18, 2018, 09:26:47 pm
I'm not trying to play the victim card
"free speech! free speech! everyone should be able to say whatever they want without getting muted! friend friend friend friend friend friend friend! friend!"
*gets muted*
"wtf??? why i get muted & no one else does?!?! i demand that you mute those ppl too!!!! it isn't fair!!"
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Grytviken on October 18, 2018, 09:27:57 pm
The mean admins are muting people that spam N****** over and over every round. Why can't they just understand the complex and deeper meaning behind these 12 year old autistic outbursts, it's just not fair! I'm allowed to do it in Call of Duty black ops 4 !
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: nikklenikkle on October 18, 2018, 09:28:56 pm
very good rebuttal
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: nikklenikkle on October 18, 2018, 09:35:53 pm
Ok well if the whole point is just a recommendation for the entire admin team to be truly consistent in how they deal with the broad issue of in game chat racism (and verbal abuse?) I would say your recommendation is unreasonable to expect and more than a little bit naive.

In game administration amounts to little more than in the moment judgement calls that each individual admin makes in an effort to keep people playing while following the basic rules. It will always be case by case, there will never be actual consistency. Remember, admins are just as dumb as you are.
im just giving feedback to the admin team. even morris admitted I have a point in the argument im making. I really hope that every time admins get criticized you dont resort to "we are human too!!!! we make mistakes as well!!!" let me ask this, why is the N word banned? If its something completely unrelated with it being offensive then Ill admit im retarded and just lock the thread, but If it is to do with something along the lines of it being offensive, maybe theres a black member in the community or whatever the fuck reason you give, then id bet that your reasoning can be applied with people making remarks about islam. I feel like the only reason you people are disagreeing with me is because narmins incredibly toxic and you dont wanna shift the rules to help him

edit- i rly didnt expect this to blow up like it did. just trying to help improve this community
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: chesterotab on October 18, 2018, 09:42:39 pm
Using that word in the chat is against the rules because the people the created the mod, and the people that currently run the mod decided it is. It being "offensive" is almost irrelevant. They don't even need to make it a specific rule, it neatly fits into the existing "racism" umbrella.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Meli on October 18, 2018, 09:51:42 pm
Again, the problem is inconsistency. Either you censor it all or you censor nothing.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: nikklenikkle on October 18, 2018, 09:56:34 pm
chester why do you think the devs decided to ban it? Id say its a safe guess to say that they did so because it was offensive. Which goes back to weve been saying for the past 5 pages, if the CRPG admins are worried about the N word being offensive they should be worried about it all and not pick and choose.

if for whatever reason your confident that the rule is fine as it is then we will stop but i think your logic is flawed
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: bensai on October 18, 2018, 09:56:37 pm
for everyones sake

lock this thread

right now
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Grytviken on October 18, 2018, 10:03:48 pm
Again, the problem is inconsistency. Either you censor it all or you censor nothing.

https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

You should take this time to educate yourself on the tenets evils of Islam and then come back and we can have an intelligent conversation.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: chesterotab on October 18, 2018, 10:04:47 pm
Consistency would be if a hard coded word filter was implememnted. You can't actually believe in game crpg admins would be capable of being consistent. In game admins are allowed and even expected to pick and choose how to deal with issues like this.

Heres a 2011 post from the creator of the mod and owner of this website, look for the post by chadz http://forum.melee.org/general-discussion/the-vast-majority-of-the-eu_crpg_1-admin-team/msg21701/#msg21701
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Casul on October 18, 2018, 10:09:29 pm
real example: Cassi is muting anyone whos saying the n word or any kind of fancy variation of it, but is not muting over insults of mostly any other kind.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Asheram on October 18, 2018, 10:22:30 pm
Make me badmin I will mute for everything.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Rando on October 19, 2018, 12:01:14 am
The only people who can change the way these rules are enforced now are James of Acre and Uthyr Pendragon. The rest of the admins simply do their job, although they could easily coup the current "cRPG government" if they really wanted to.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Kadeth on October 19, 2018, 12:57:46 am
moddb doesn't matter
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Drunken_sailor on October 19, 2018, 01:21:52 am
moddb doesn't matter

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Tristan_of_Erzoth on October 19, 2018, 01:47:22 am
I have banned the word "the" from being used henceforth. Consistency will be valued, do not try and circumvent this.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Asheram on October 19, 2018, 01:49:00 am
Make me badmin I will mute for everything.
Bro these kids would have to be crazy to make you an admin. You know all you would do is look for any reason to mute/ban everyone who pissed you off til you got fired.
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Jacaroma on October 19, 2018, 01:53:16 am
I have banned the word "the" from being used henceforth. Consistency will be valued, do not try and circumvent this.
T|-|3
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: Asheram on October 19, 2018, 02:02:13 am
I have banned the word "the" from being used henceforth. Consistency will be valued, do not try and circumvent this.
what about da?
Title: Re: hypocritical ruleset
Post by: nikklenikkle on October 19, 2018, 02:25:43 am
after a series of very compelling arguments such as "ur a whiny bitch" and "its a rule because the people who own crpg made it a rule" ive decided to forfeit this battle and bow my head in shame