cRPG
cRPG => Suggestions Corner => Topic started by: emirso2 on January 07, 2018, 04:01:34 am
-
I gathered up some thoughts from a quick talk with the friends from c-RPG community :D, Apparently, they were all crying about using only one hero in c-RPG battles, stuck with the one same build. It takes some many days to change a hero to another character.So if we had an option to change heroes at the battle it would be useful and more fun in the battles for both sides. I think this is potentially a good suggestion yet it needs more rubbing to make it more strong.
If I had the opportunity to use 2 different characters in the same battle.I would go with these builds
for example :
Cav and Arc
2h and Arc
PoleArm and 2H
Thrower and HA
-It could also beneficial for both sides in battles, such as if X side is defending a castle if they have enough infantry and need more ranged. It would be useful to change to archer when its needed in the battle if you are defending the place.The people who have another character as an archer could benefit this opportunity. The same for other builds, depending on the battle requirements as an what type of soldier you need.
-In some maps because of the lands, cavalry can sometimes be useless or more advantaged so the ones who cant do anything in battles because of the land can choose another character to play or if its too powerful they can either choose pikeman to make it more balanced battles.
-More cavalry in land battles.If it is needed
Just leave a comment saying what you think about it :arrow:
This suggestion would be a push in the good direction: more freedom to choose who you want to fight as in Strategus Battles!
Means you have pikers on field- , and 2h heroes on siegebattles, sure sounds like fun.
I find the decrease from 7 to 3 days for changing heroes is awesome enough.
Probably too complicated to implement.
-
Polearm AND 2h yeah
thats what we need!
-
I don't want to be spammed by people who don't even know how to block, no thanks.
-
Give 2h-heroes the opportunity to be ranged and they will teamkill each other for being bundle of stickss ^^
-
It could also beneficial for both sides in battles, such as if X side is defending a castle if they have enough infantry and need more ranged. It would be useful to change to archer when its needed in the battle if you are defending the place.The people who have another character as an archer could benefit this opportunity. The same for other builds, depending on the battle requirements as an what type of soldier battle needs.
-
This suggestion would be a push in the good direction: more freedom to choose who you want to fight as in Strategus Battles!
-
This suggestion would be a push in the good direction: more freedom to choose who you want to fight as in Strategus Battles!
the commander of battle should choose which of your characters fights, not you.
-
the commander of battle should choose which of your characters fights, not you.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
-
Means you have pikers on field- , and 2h heroes on siegebattles, sure sounds like fun.
I find the decrease from 7 to 3 days for changing heroes is awesome enough.
Probably too complicated to implement.
-
I don't want to be spammed by people who don't even know how to block, no thanks.
I don't think it doesn't matter in this situation.It is about your skills after all...
-
No need imo, if you want to be able to switch from one playstyle to another, just be hybrid.