cRPG

Strategus => Strategus General Discussion => Topic started by: Nebun on March 10, 2016, 05:21:25 pm

Title: UIF SANCTIONS
Post by: Nebun on March 10, 2016, 05:21:25 pm
After unprovoked attacks on our allies, we have no other choice but to widen our borders. Any attacks on neutral fiefs closer than 60km from this border will be treated as aggressive expansion that threatening balance of power in strategus. And we will have to react by applying economic sanctions and restricting, isolating aggressor.

UIF doesn’t recognise newly annexed territories by The Iron Fist aka TIF from Polanie. TIF (considered as terrorist organisation in UIF) sponsored by Independent faction and local separatists.

To remove economic sanctions, we demand enforcing Dhirim agreements :
1. TIF should leave annexed territories and release hostages.
2. Remove dictator Azap from power. To free accounts people from his tyranny. Make democratic elections.  And stop the beheadings.
3. Give in our custody a mass rapists of elderly women Oddyseus.

Contact group in Tilbaut castle will monitor the process of enforcing this agreements.

Right now we undertaking military exercises in steppe and snowy regions, to give adequate reaction to any aggression.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: UIF SANCTIONS
Post by: ARN_ on March 10, 2016, 05:28:36 pm
Quote from: Nebun on March 10, 2016, 05:21:25 pm
After unprovoked attacks on our allies, we have no other choice but to widen our borders. Any attacks on neutral fiefs closer than 60km from this border will be treated as aggressive expansion that threatening balance of power in strategus. And we will have to react by applying economic sanctions and restricting, isolating aggressor.

UIF doesn’t recognise newly annexed territories by The Iron Fist aka TIF from Polanie. TIF (considered as terrorist organisation in UIF) sponsored by Independent faction and local separatists.

To remove economic sanctions, we demand enforcing Dhirim agreements :
1. TIF should leave annexed territories and release hostages.
2. Remove dictator Azap from power. To free accounts people from his tyranny. Make democratic elections.  And stop the beheadings.
3. Give in our custody a mass rapists of elderly women Oddyseus.

Contact group in Tilbaut castle will monitor the process of enforcing this agreements.

Right now we undertaking military exercises in steppe and snowy regions, to give adequate reaction to any aggression.

(click to show/hide)
If we follow this will you leave us alone so we can play strat alone?
Title: Re: UIF SANCTIONS
Post by: Austrian on March 10, 2016, 05:30:30 pm
Quote from: Nebun on March 10, 2016, 05:21:25 pm
(click to show/hide)

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: UIF SANCTIONS
Post by: Sparvico on March 10, 2016, 05:42:35 pm
Quote from: ARN_ on March 10, 2016, 05:28:36 pm
If we follow this will you leave us alone so we can play strat alone?

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: UIF SANCTIONS
Post by: Vovka on March 10, 2016, 06:02:18 pm
soo its begin
http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusbattlesarchive#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=767
Title: Re: UIF SANCTIONS
Post by: Krave on March 10, 2016, 06:04:59 pm
Nebun, imagine I'm journalist and I ask you these questions below.

It's just anti-UIF fighting UIF side. Polanie took half of Hoboland. How is figting back unprovoked?

How you want to sanction anti-UIF if you are not trading with them anyway?

What do you mean by "balance of power"? 3 allied factions hold majority of the map? How is that balanced?

How making border behind opposed faction and conquering it is not a aggression. And how said faction is aggressor?



Title: Re: UIF SANCTIONS
Post by: Nebun on March 10, 2016, 06:41:50 pm
Quote from: Krave on March 10, 2016, 06:04:59 pm
Nebun, imagine I'm journalist and I ask you these questions below.

It's just anti-UIF fighting UIF side. Polanie took half of Hoboland. How is figting back unprovoked?

How you want to sanction anti-UIF if you are not trading with them anyway?

What do you mean by "balance of power"? 3 allied factions hold majority of the map? How is that balanced?

How making border behind opposed faction and conquering it is not a aggression. And how said faction is aggressor?

1. Polanie made referendum in so called hobolands. Where 99.99% of people voted to join Polanie, and the rest 0.01% was detained to avoid violence.
2. By stopping their trade between themselves. Attack their trucks with goods.
3. I don't have that information, i will have to confirm it with my superiors.
4. We bringing peace and democracy, we are on the good side of history. If we have to kill some people terrorists, to take their territory, to use their oil goods for better good, then we do it.

At this time, it is critical that all sides avoid violence, the future of Independent faction should be determined by their people in accordance with Independents constitution ... All Independents have both a right and responsibility to peacefully participate in this process. The UIF remains firmly committed to supporting all Independents in this endeavor.
Title: Re: UIF SANCTIONS
Post by: Nebun on March 10, 2016, 06:50:53 pm
Quote from: ARN_ on March 10, 2016, 05:28:36 pm
If we follow this will you leave us alone so we can play strat alone?

Sure ARN. As soon as u lay down ur weapon and give it under our control we are happy to send u humanitarian help: Cat fur coats and honey with bread.
Title: Re: UIF SANCTIONS
Post by: _Tamra_ on March 10, 2016, 07:46:25 pm
Duh, well guess my beg for mercy on Vovka wasn't that successful then.
Title: Re: UIF SANCTIONS
Post by: NoobSaibot on March 10, 2016, 10:25:28 pm
No mercy we are going to devastate and destroy!
Title: Re: UIF SANCTIONS
Post by: Nebun on March 10, 2016, 11:40:05 pm
Quote from: _Tamra_ on March 10, 2016, 07:46:25 pm
Duh, well guess my beg for mercy on Vovka wasn't that successful then.

20k anti uif armies in polanie lands. They attacked, we reacted. Giving up so they feel better about themselves is not an option.
Title: Re: UIF SANCTIONS
Post by: Butan on March 11, 2016, 02:13:06 am
60km is a bit too small, the world width is about 120km, would be better  :P
Title: Re: UIF SANCTIONS
Post by: Nebun on March 11, 2016, 02:59:39 am
Quote from: Butan on March 11, 2016, 02:13:06 am
60km is a bit too small, the world width is about 120km, would be better  :P

if u look closely, below the line is our claims, everything above line is less then 60km away from the line, so its just perfect.
Title: Re: UIF SANCTIONS
Post by: GRANDMOM on March 11, 2016, 09:36:53 am
Thanks Nebun!

A little reservation, totally free of the UIF?

OMG the fun we can have in this playground- Im moving north already, might start a new faction, get a couple of guys into it and fight a war on somebody besides the UIF for the first time in 2 years time - can I count on your rostersupport or do u divide it between attacker/defender?  :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
Title: Re: UIF SANCTIONS
Post by: Butan on March 11, 2016, 12:41:03 pm
Quote from: Nebun on March 11, 2016, 02:59:39 am
if u look closely, below the line is our claims, everything above line is less then 60km away from the line, so its just perfect.

Ah, its true, just checked  :lol: