cRPG

Strategus => Diplomacy => Topic started by: Novamere on February 22, 2016, 02:36:49 am

Title: Brotherhood vs Confederacy Treaty
Post by: Novamere on February 22, 2016, 02:36:49 am
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy Treaty
Post by: Novamere on February 22, 2016, 02:37:31 am
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy Treaty
Post by: Cassander on February 22, 2016, 02:38:45 am
visitors can't see pics , please register or login





This message was approved by Cash "Unloading my nine at the welfare line" "Money" Anders The Jello Warrior
Title: Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy Treaty
Post by: Tristan_of_Erzoth on February 22, 2016, 02:39:31 am
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy Treaty
Post by: Sparvico on February 22, 2016, 02:52:30 am
Wow Basically knightmare has tiny steroid dick and tristan cries to mama instead of ft8.
Title: Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy Treaty
Post by: Novamere on February 22, 2016, 02:55:02 am
Wow Basically knightmare has tiny steroid dick and tristan cries to mama instead of ft8.

Idk what the fuck this guy just said but i think its okay  :?
Title: Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy Treaty
Post by: MURDERTRON on February 22, 2016, 03:24:06 am
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

--TRUMP
Title: Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy Treaty
Post by: Keshian on February 22, 2016, 03:28:41 am
I suck at images :(

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy Treaty
Post by: Novamere on February 22, 2016, 03:30:59 am
Kesh's wont work so on behalf

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy Treaty
Post by: sLaughterino on February 22, 2016, 04:15:14 am
On behalf of the Hounds of Chulainn
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy Treaty
Post by: chesterotab on February 22, 2016, 08:02:42 pm
Truly a fine war that was. You learned a lot about each other. A peaceful rest and alliance after all of the cool battles you fought is well earned.

The confederacy brotherhood war is the one I will remember most fondly. You guys have big dicks and are not bundle of sticks care bears for entering into an alliance with each other.
Title: Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy Treaty
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on February 22, 2016, 08:15:36 pm
Truly a fine war that was. You learned a lot about each other. A peaceful rest and alliance after all of the cool battles you fought is well earned.

The confederacy brotherhood war is the one I will remember most fondly. You guys have big dicks and are not bundle of sticks care bears for entering into an alliance with each other.

my favorite part was that not only was there an alliance but it is literally so carebear that it is "enforced" by two totally separate factions that if anyone disobeys the Internet agreement they all shit on them for starting conflict in a war game
Title: Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy Treaty
Post by: Novamere on February 22, 2016, 08:34:20 pm
my favorite part was that not only was there an alliance but it is literally so carebear that it is "enforced" by two totally separate factions that if anyone disobeys the Internet agreement they all shit on them for starting conflict in a war game

hahahaha i love how u put this and its rare me and u agree But were going to have more Dhirim battles this is not the end of the bloodshed so stay tuned  :lol: I would rather not waste peoples time at the moment with meaningless shit 20k ticks of XP when we could have over 100k
Title: Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy Treaty
Post by: Tristan_of_Erzoth on February 22, 2016, 09:28:35 pm
The problem with this "war" is that anytime someone would try and make an offensive move on either side someone from outside would cockblock and the other side would get like a thousand messages from different factions saying "if u do that we will come and kill you". So yeah that war was weak af and ending it now was probably the best decision for me and Knightmare to make.
Title: Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy Treaty
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on February 22, 2016, 09:44:44 pm
The problem with this "war" is that anytime someone would try and make an offensive move on either side someone from outside would cockblock and the other side would get like a thousand messages from different factions saying "if u do that we will come and kill you". So yeah that war was weak af and ending it now was probably the best decision for me and Knightmare to make.

I, uh..

That's how shit gets popped off and interesting, man! You know, any sort of conflict with disparity between sides (all of 'em really) is going to involve one side requesting overt or covert assistance from others. After all, everyone is presumably interested at least a bit in "victory".

I understand the bombardment of messages on forums and site when diplomacy is going on. Shit, I feel bombarded at times in this strat when we barely even HAVE diplomacy in this faction here.

But man, I'm a little disappointed in you. Not specifically for not fighting knightmare, but for backing down from a fight without any proper campaign on either side. Not just that, but allying with your "enemy"!

The most fun part of any strategus round for me was certainly leading the new and small Frisian faction against a somewhat established faction in early Strat 4. I recognized that we were outnumbered, so I eagerly sought out the most powerful friends I could find, and attempted to present ourselves on the forums as tougher than all shit (and by that I mean autistic as all shit).

That shit was awesome, and we never even considered backing down from someone that had initiated aggression on us, we never really pondered quitting because we didn't want to expend the effort. I understand that not everyone is down to be a strat nerd, and that shit's fine. If everyone that played cRPG was a full-fledged strat nerd as well, I imagine the global economy would take a minor hit from lost revenue.

But goddamnit, if you're gonna be a nerd-herding sort, you gotta stick with this shit!

I'd also like to throw props out to Blue and other guys from that old Halitrous faction. After losing several key players, they ain't quitting. They aren't complaining for shit, either. He's understandaby asked for a bit of a ceasefire to organize a new strat faction...and naturally, I've not been at the PC to make that happen. Sorry for that, bud.

But for real buddy, say you attacked Knightmare in force and (completely arbitrary) say HOC jumped in full force against you. My intelligence on the matter isn't the best at all, but I reckon you'd be in a bit of shitty water with that fight. You know, you aren't so intensely unlikable that YOU couldn't pull other factions into the war with you. ESPECIALLY if you find yourself outnumbered. Ain't ANYONE in this strat so unlikable that they're fucked in terms of friends. So you throw an endorsement behind President Trump or some shit, and HE comes to your aid. Now its a fair fight or a fight in YOUR favor. You know what happens if the tables turn and you've got more folks, resources, and brain cells than the other side? They'll do the exact same thing until everyone uninvolved are constantly hammered (ala Arys), constantly neutral (ala fucking pussies), or already engaged in an unrelated conflict.

what this autism is trying to tell you is that you were a little bitch tristran, i'm sorry, but i feel an obligation to let you know when you goofed up

but its ok you can make this right
Title: Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy Treaty
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on February 22, 2016, 09:51:44 pm
Sandy literally only the last like three sentences of that were necessary you're making us look like nerds god damn it
Title: Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy Treaty
Post by: Novamere on February 22, 2016, 09:53:56 pm
I, uh..

That's how shit gets popped off and interesting, man! You know, any sort of conflict with disparity between sides (all of 'em really) is going to involve one side requesting overt or covert assistance from others. After all, everyone is presumably interested at least a bit in "victory".

I understand the bombardment of messages on forums and site when diplomacy is going on. Shit, I feel bombarded at times in this strat when we barely even HAVE diplomacy in this faction here.

But man, I'm a little disappointed in you. Not specifically for not fighting knightmare, but for backing down from a fight without any proper campaign on either side. Not just that, but allying with your "enemy"!

The most fun part of any strategus round for me was certainly leading the new and small Frisian faction against a somewhat established faction in early Strat 4. I recognized that we were outnumbered, so I eagerly sought out the most powerful friends I could find, and attempted to present ourselves on the forums as tougher than all shit (and by that I mean autistic as all shit).

That shit was awesome, and we never even considered backing down from someone that had initiated aggression on us, we never really pondered quitting because we didn't want to expend the effort. I understand that not everyone is down to be a strat nerd, and that shit's fine. If everyone that played cRPG was a full-fledged strat nerd as well, I imagine the global economy would take a minor hit from lost revenue.

But goddamnit, if you're gonna be a nerd-herding sort, you gotta stick with this shit!

I'd also like to throw props out to Blue and other guys from that old Halitrous faction. After losing several key players, they ain't quitting. They aren't complaining for shit, either. He's understandaby asked for a bit of a ceasefire to organize a new strat faction...and naturally, I've not been at the PC to make that happen. Sorry for that, bud.

But for real buddy, say you attacked Knightmare in force and (completely arbitrary) say HOC jumped in full force against you. My intelligence on the matter isn't the best at all, but I reckon you'd be in a bit of shitty water with that fight. You know, you aren't so intensely unlikable that YOU couldn't pull other factions into the war with you. ESPECIALLY if you find yourself outnumbered. Ain't ANYONE in this strat so unlikable that they're fucked in terms of friends. So you throw an endorsement behind President Trump or some shit, and HE comes to your aid. Now its a fair fight or a fight in YOUR favor. You know what happens if the tables turn and you've got more folks, resources, and brain cells than the other side? They'll do the exact same thing until everyone uninvolved are constantly hammered (ala Arys), constantly neutral (ala fucking pussies), or already engaged in an unrelated conflict.

what this autism is trying to tell you is that you were a little bitch tristran, i'm sorry, but i feel an obligation to let you know when you goofed up

but its ok you can make this right

Sandy u know what we posted on this forum was like 1/8 of what we talked about and did, we agreed the whole community does not need to know everything that pertained to it,

Also we talked for hours together about everything it was not some surrender or die kinda bullshit there is alot more to it then anyone else besides our 2 clans can see.
Title: Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy Treaty
Post by: Bronto on February 22, 2016, 09:54:39 pm
Sandy literally only the last like three sentences of that we're necessary you're making us look like nerds god damn it

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy Treaty
Post by: Sparvico on February 22, 2016, 10:31:15 pm
Sandy u know what we posted on this forum was like 1/8 of what we talked about and did, we agreed the whole community does not need to know everything that pertained to it,

Also we talked for hours together about everything it was not some surrender or die kinda bullshit there is alot more to it then anyone else besides our 2 clans can see.

That's fair, however the general principle we see at play here is that you feel it is better not to fight than to fight. You keep talking about shitty battles as if we'll never reach plate unless we care-bare together. That is straight up wrong. In fact if the majority of the map does care-bare it up until plate they'll probably be so many people that stop playing because they are bored that the fights then will be even worse than now.

Strat is interesting so long as the people that play make it interesting, and doing dick all for 2 years ain't interesting, let me tell you. The community is on an up-swing at the moment due to the start of a new round. The longer it takes for most factions to become involved in player vs. player wars the more difficult it becomes to keep that momentum up.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy Treaty
Post by: blizz on February 22, 2016, 10:43:51 pm
idk ppl are posting signatures so ill hop on the bandwagon cuz im a follower
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy Treaty
Post by: Novamere on February 22, 2016, 10:56:44 pm
Me, kesh and tristan just supplied NA with some great Town battles against a meat grinder so no one can say shit, i will be making more battles ASAP not sitting in some fucking town jerking myself off for the rest of strat u can quote me on that, I already have my eyes set on next targets.
Title: Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy Treaty
Post by: Sparvico on February 22, 2016, 11:05:06 pm
Me, kesh and tristan just supplied NA with some great Town battles against a meat grinder so no one can say shit, i will be making more battles ASAP not sitting in some fucking town jerking myself off for the rest of strat u can quote me on that, I already have my eyes set on next targets.

That's dandy, but battles alone don't make strat interesting. It's the nature of conflicts, how they start, where they take place. It's the little things getting blown up into major wars, it's the " Let's go fuck on them" motivation that keeps people engaged. Fighting AI isn't boring because the battles have low tier gear, it's boring because you can't put a persona to the AI, you can't make an enemy out of it. There aren't any real stakes beyond "Meh this gear kinda costed money". You need to have player wars from the very get go otherwise people disengage with the community, especially when there are fewer of us around in the first place.
Title: Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy Treaty
Post by: Tristan_of_Erzoth on February 22, 2016, 11:13:23 pm
Sparvico you make a good point. Don't worry within a week I'll make someone angry and they'll declare war on me or someone will piss me off and I'll declare war on them.








(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy Treaty
Post by: Novamere on February 22, 2016, 11:22:37 pm
Sparvico you make a good point. Don't worry within a week I'll make someone angry and they'll declare war on me or someone will piss me off and I'll declare war on them.








(click to show/hide)

And what? I wont do the same lol

Its me and Tristan people not fucking Anders and Astralis
Title: Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy Treaty
Post by: Jona on February 22, 2016, 11:34:17 pm
Its me and Tristan people not fucking Anders and Astralis

Those right there are some fightin' words, if I ever did see any.


Don't worry within a week I'll make someone angry and they'll declare war on me

And what? I wont do the same lol

*hint hint banders*
Title: Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy Treaty
Post by: Sparvico on February 23, 2016, 02:12:03 am
And what? I wont do the same lol

Its me and Tristan people not fucking Anders and Astralis

This is an official notice then kid. If you do not manage to find yourself engaged in a real conflict by this time next month your holdings will be considered in forfeiture pending reclamation by a faction that will actually use them.
Title: Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy Treaty
Post by: Novamere on February 23, 2016, 02:34:37 am
This is an official notice then kid. If you do not manage to find yourself engaged in a real conflict by this time next month your holdings will be considered in forfeiture pending reclamation by a faction that will actually use them.

Who are you again? Send Havelle to talk to me about stuff bud.