cRPG

cRPG => Ban/Unban Requests => NA (Official) => Topic started by: Dr_Device on October 28, 2015, 07:01:49 am

Title: Ban DEPLOY_SHIELDS and Tiny_Glancer
Post by: Dr_Device on October 28, 2015, 07:01:49 am
1. Name of your character involved - Devak
2. Name of offending character(s) - DEPLOY_SHIELDS and Tiny_Glancer
3. Time and server, as accurately as possible - NA1 ~10:50 PM PST, October 27th.
4. Written description of what happened, the whole story. Also what happened before and after. - Tiny_Glancer and DEPLOY_SHIELDS started team killing each other. When one died they would reconnect to the server and double spawn then go kill the other. The server was getting smaller at that point so having 2 useless teammates was basically a guaranteed loss.
5. Why you think the offender did what he did. - They're idiots.
6. Multiple Screenshots
(click to show/hide)
7. Names of players that can witness what happened. - Gallonigher, Gigglebyte, Davic.
Title: Re: Ban DEPLOY_SHIELDS and Tiny_Glancer
Post by: HappyPhantom on October 28, 2015, 09:22:10 am
Tiny glancer obvs putting an end to POOPs unwanted advances.  No on complained about it in server at time,  I would have told them to quit it.  Pretty sure I'm confirmed badmin though,  check with schoi.

That badmin = badminton  auto correct  lol
Title: Re: Ban DEPLOY_SHIELDS and Tiny_Glancer
Post by: POOPHAMMER on October 28, 2015, 04:26:14 pm
Yes that was me, I had drank a lot last night. I forwarded this topic to the head admin and I am willing to face whatever punishment or demotion that is given to me.

I apologize profusely for this, I do not even remember doing this at all, I was rather shocked when I came to check the ban section and saw a thread for me here.
Title: Re: Ban DEPLOY_SHIELDS and Tiny_Glancer
Post by: saccizord on October 28, 2015, 06:16:47 pm
They're obviously doing it for silly late night fun, it's not like you're forced to play seriously.
You're just salty...
Title: Re: Ban DEPLOY_SHIELDS and Tiny_Glancer
Post by: Donkey guy on October 28, 2015, 06:53:42 pm
http://forum.melee.org/na-(official)/ban-tiny_glancer-for-intentional-teamwounding-(intention-to-teamkill)/

dood tk ib u cumplane bout he delay. dat probly wut haphen hire.
Title: Re: Ban DEPLOY_SHIELDS and Tiny_Glancer
Post by: Rainbow on October 28, 2015, 06:57:31 pm
well.. these things did happen.  One screenshot I even called it out.  Looks like nobody is denying anything here.  Admins should be held to a top notch standard IMO and if they can't oblige their roles, they should not be an admin.  I am certain there are many capable well behave players that would gladly step up and be held accountable to said standards.  0 tolerance IMO. 
Title: Re: Ban DEPLOY_SHIELDS and Tiny_Glancer
Post by: Dr_Device on October 28, 2015, 08:09:52 pm
Quote from: Malevolence on October 28, 2015, 04:26:14 pm
Yes that was me, I had drank a lot last night. I forwarded this topic to the head admin and I am willing to face whatever punishment or demotion that is given to me.

I apologize profusely for this, I do not even remember doing this at all, I was rather shocked when I came to check the ban section and saw a thread for me here.

Well damn it. It's always easier to throw up a ban thread when the person you ban thread is a massive douche about it.

Anyways, I slept on it and regret putting this thread up. It was annoying, but not really a big enough deal to ban thread people over, especially since he was very obviously drunk at the time. Not sure what it'll accomplish since he's already forwarded this thread, but I'd like to retract my complaint.
Title: Re: Ban DEPLOY_SHIELDS and Tiny_Glancer
Post by: Jeade on October 29, 2015, 04:20:01 am
Quote from: Dr_Device on October 28, 2015, 08:09:52 pm
It's always easier to throw up a ban thread when the person you ban thread is a massive douche about it.

Very true. Whenever I've had issues with players--or they have an issue with me--I like to head over to their TS and talk about it for a bit.
It's tough to be angry at someone when you realize they're just another human being (unless they're still huge cunts about it).

Anyway, I'll lock the thread for you.