cRPG
cRPG => General Discussion => Topic started by: Arthur_ on July 01, 2015, 10:43:04 pm
-
Check this you noble forum warriors.
http://forum.melee.org/diplomacy/eu-invasion-2015/
-
Which side has the worst roster support?
-
Just started so we're not sure. First battle the Kalmar's had full roster, but about 35-40 EU players and only 10-15 NAs. We'll see how the rosters look in the next few battles.
-
I would have to say that roster support is going to vary on what time the battle takes place.
In the first battle both sides had full rosters but HCE had 13 mercs not show up.
It was a fun and good fight and I think everyone should get involved as best they can.
-
So now u guys understand why we wanted to attack at that time? :) It's not our fault that ur guys don't show up, if they did it would have been a glorious battle, but let's hope the next ones will be
-
Well we didn't actually want to attack at that time, but he was waiting outside a castle waiting for a crime to go down so we had to go a bit early. Pushed it as far as we could.
-
That's a bad time for all of us honestly. I got out if work around 2pm eastern for the battle that was at 3. The people who signed up and didn't make it were at work.
Also I'm not in HCE, I just like shitposting
-
They have no chance of building forward spawns / catapults 8-)
-
For caraf castle we should do a field battle. Would be more realistic, we totally destroied it :D
-
Btw I dont know if I want NA peoples hatred as well :?
-
Btw I dont know if I want NA peoples hatred as well :?
I think that you shouldnt even bother with getting the NA playerbase approval only the once that will actualy play for you.
-
I would have to say that roster support is going to vary on what time the battle takes place.
In the first battle both sides had full rosters but HCE had 13 mercs not show up.
It was a fun and good fight and I think everyone should get involved as best they can.
if you guys would have had full roster show up we would have had a hard time i can imagine. was really fun, and I am greatfull for both sides seeing it through : )
-
Kalmar side had a 20 player advantage most of the battle.
Can both sides please only accept people who are actually there until the last minutes before the battle?
That would make it easier to choose which side to play for to make the battles as enjoyable as possible by keeping the numbers even.
-
Kalmar side had a 20 player advantage most of the battle.
Can both sides please only accept people who are actually there until the last minutes before the battle?
That would make it easier to choose which side to play for to make the battles as enjoyable as possible by keeping the numbers even.
Just come to ts and see how many guys are there, if we have many already please go and apply for acre. They need all help they can get
-
http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusbattlesarchive#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=4488 <-Six player advantage due to Acre not bothering to fight for a village
http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusbattlesarchive#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=4485 <-Five player advantage with 20 euros on the Eques side
http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusbattlesarchive#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=4489 <-One player advantage for Acre
http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusbattlesarchive#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=4492 <-Five player advatage for Eques again in a village battle
There's been a couple of stacked battles at EU prime time which Acre could avoid with either not moving their traders/reinforcements in EU prime time, or setting their night time to cover most of it instead of most of NA prime time which they've done in some cases.
Balanced rosters are hard to get when people apply to whomever they are more familiar with or hate less. I wouldn't mind seeing some more EU players fighting for the Acres as well.
-
yeah i wish the battles had more fair rosters. it would make it more fun for everyone.
-
Cmon, half of us has a ping of 150 and we still fight. So don't fuck around with ya rosters. They are fair as long as we attack and we EU players have.