visitors can't see pics , please register or loginhaahahahahahahahah
psychotic babble
op right now
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Rules of galaxy and lifeless is proves all sexists would be ultimately proven that woman can potentially grow into man. Similarly man can reduce to woman, if he loses some part of ‘Y’. remark should be answered with one equation(MAN IS THE EXTENSION OF WOMAN)But look at the man. He is something more. He is X and Y. That means, he is essentially an ‘X ’plus something extra. What do I mean by that! Man is already a woman that is ‘X’, plus something extra. Does that mean first step towards manhood is womanhood? Now let’s talk in mathematical language. Here is the equation, Man = 22 autosomes + X + Y Woman= 22 autosomes + X + X= 22 autsomes + X (by logic not by mathematics). . . Man= (22 autosomes + X) + Y= Woman + Y (by mathematics, simply) So man is everything that woman is, plus something extra. Now the extra thing is not qualitatively different, but quantitatively. Hence Y here must be somewhat like X + 1, X+2 or X+ 3 or something like that.
No idea what OP wrote but the title annoys me.
YX-X is not Y
schizo32417 alt account spotted.schizo32417 +1 farmer spotted.
No idea what OP wrote but the title annoys me.
YX-X is not Y
Yes it is. You see, when Voyager 1 left our solar system last year, we found that our model of solar system isn't just about right. That model was based on calculations and observation from a far like everything else space related. Something was clearly missing.visitors can't see pics , please register or login
In this case we don't see + between Y and X. If we place it between Y and X
Y + X - X = Y
equation is true.
Kids, always put math symbols between variables. Obviously Y * X - X is not Y, I can agree to that. You can use a dot or x to point out that some multiplication is going on, I don't discriminate.
schizo32417 +1 farmer spotted.
Leave it to the math nerd.
YX-X=Y
This is Y*X-X=Y
which is X*(Y-1)=Y
so X=Y/(Y-1)
Oh wait, we were solving for Y.
Ok, Y=X/(X-1)
Why? Because Y*X-X=Y
and Y*X-X-Y=0
then Y*X-Y=X
so Y(X-1)=X
therefore Y=X/(X-1)
Simple, yes? So what have we learned from all this? Say it with me class. "Cheese is good!" visitors can't see pics , please register or login
In algebra YX always means Y*X, it never means Y+X
But so far I haven't met proper mathematician who doesn't type *, x or dot between variables.
Rules of galaxy and lifeless is proves all sexists would be ultimately proven that woman can potentially grow into man. Similarly man can reduce to woman, if he loses some part of ‘Y’. remark should be answered with one equation(MAN IS THE EXTENSION OF WOMAN)But look at the man. He is something more. He is X and Y. That means, he is essentially an ‘X ’plus something extra. What do I mean by that! Man is already a woman that is ‘X’, plus something extra. Does that mean first step towards manhood is womanhood? Now let’s talk in mathematical language. Here is the equation, Man = 22 autosomes + X + Y Woman= 22 autosomes + X + X= 22 autsomes + X (by logic not by mathematics). . . Man= (22 autosomes + X) + Y= Woman + Y (by mathematics, simply) So man is everything that woman is, plus something extra. Now the extra thing is not qualitatively different, but quantitatively. Hence Y here must be somewhat like X + 1, X+2 or X+ 3 or something like that.
Man = 22 autosomes + X + Y Woman= 22 autosomes + X + X= 22 autsomes + X (by logic not by mathematics)
Well, I guess that means I don't know my math? Anyone who is a 'mathematician' knows what XY means. If you start typing XxY, then shit gets confusing. Is that X*X*Y, and you simply forgot to capitalize the second? Is it multiplication (X times Y)? Outside of programming languages, "*" is almost never used, simply because it is not actually a math symbol. If you try and type up any professional report using an asterisk, people will laugh at you, or if it is being submitted for grading, you will most certainly lose points. Same goes for using an x for multiplication. It is too easy to confuse with another variable. Therefore, the only acceptable forms of writing X times Y would be XY (or I suppose X(Y), although you rarely see that, since it could be confused as the function X of Y), or X dot Y. X dot Y may be used in the most 'professional' of reports, if only because it takes a lot more time to find the proper "dot" symbol unless you have a newer Microsoft Word program.
Tl;dr: You must have not met any true mathematicians, or you have only met some code junkies, since * is only acceptable in programming.
You call yourself mathematician but you don't use LaTeX...That is actually a true statement.
You call yourself mathematician but you don't use LaTeX...
I am not a mathematician, but I am an engineer who writes many, many lab reports. Reports consist primarily of words, hence I use Microsoft Word for my reports. The few mathematical equations / derivations that need to be written can easily be done so using the 'equation' input in Word. In the past, yes, equations were a pain in the ass to do in Word. Nowadays it is much simpler.You obviously don't know Latex.