cRPG

Strategus => Strategus General Discussion => Topic started by: PsychoTwins on March 23, 2014, 12:48:04 am

Title: FCC #2?
Post by: PsychoTwins on March 23, 2014, 12:48:04 am
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


So GFORCE + LCO = FCC #2...?

Became what you hate arowaine? If you cant beat them join them I guess  :mrgreen:

Inb4 Kesh rant/shitpost.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: martybarty on March 23, 2014, 12:50:23 am
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Sir_Wonka on March 23, 2014, 12:52:55 am
Na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, Batman!
Na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, Batman!
Batman, Batman, KESH!
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on March 23, 2014, 12:55:51 am
Not exactly the same. FCC (read: Kesh) instilled a sperg-loathing in nerds the likes of which I've seen against nobody in NA. There aren't nearly as many people rabidly, fervently, even religiously/righteously opposed to LCO, Arowaine, or GForce.

Comparisons of size or other forms may or may not be accurate, I'm not gonna look into it that much. I'm just gonna make sure we end up fighting someone as much as we can so strategus isn't dead on arrival. Right now it's on a ventilator and it ain't looking pretty. I just hope we can avoid a total flatline.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Working_Class on March 23, 2014, 02:32:31 am
GG for killing strat LCO
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: imisshotmail on March 23, 2014, 02:58:34 am
We prefer to be called the NA UIF.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: arowaine on March 23, 2014, 03:03:37 am
yeah sorry i wanted to be kesh 2.0 he has been my mentor the past 3 years i learn a lot from him thanks to fcc and all their friends that play with them. i love you all, also thanks that you guys think we are a big ass faction now i feel like ve from strat 4 just with half of the number but you guys are all rigth quality over quantity!

ps: im quite surprise none whine about ve being so big back in strat 4 when lco was figthing them
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: MURDERTRON on March 23, 2014, 03:04:18 am
From now on, please refer to our faction as Le GForce et compagnie.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Keshian on March 23, 2014, 03:25:31 am
Yeah, I think the main difference is we didn't vassalize ourselves to EU, FCC still represents purr homegrown fuckin 'Merica!!  Sadly Gforce and LCO have always lacked the sense of national pride and this is not to be unexpected with both of them at one time or another being vassals of the russians in EU.

I still have an earlier post by Bale or me, can't remember which off-hand, about how having Gforce, Gobblins, LCO, all refusing to fight each other because they lacked enough skill in the game to fight anyone remotely their size, that this strat was already dead in week 1 or 2.  So far the prediction is well on track and I'm glad I barely play anymore, with how dead the people that still play have made this strat (exceptions of course to the various small clans in the northeast who have been duking it out with relatively equal-sized opponents).

Oh well, glad I'm not wasting much time on a mod that the community would rather kill off with boredom than risk losing a pixel on the map.  I put in the effort last strat and am very happy with the result - had tons of fun with FCC being very active all strat.  Sadly arowaine and murder seemed to not have inherited my sense of responsibility as one of the leaders of one of the largest factions on the map to support and maintain a strong strat community and keep the mod active. 


P.S.  Also the community has shrunk significantly - having the two largest factions on the map be allies would have been like occitan and FCC allying last strat - stupid and boring and even worse with how little activity occitan does every strat.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Wesleysnipes on March 23, 2014, 03:26:07 am
We will fight to the death to stop their tentacle rape.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on March 23, 2014, 03:39:37 am
seriously who cares can we please just stop
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: SucculentHeadCrab on March 23, 2014, 03:57:41 am
Your relationship with the community Kesh has deteriorated from -999999999999999 to  :evil:
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Tears of Destiny on March 23, 2014, 04:18:56 am
Oh my god I found Patrick.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: imisshotmail on March 23, 2014, 04:58:39 am
Oh well, glad I'm not wasting much time on a mod that the community would rather kill off with boredom than risk losing a pixel on the map.  I put in the effort last strat and am very happy with the result - had tons of fun with FCC being very active all strat.  Sadly arowaine and murder seemed to not have inherited my sense of responsibility as one of the leaders of one of the largest factions on the map to support and maintain a strong strat community and keep the mod active. 

GFORCE have had the most battles in NA so far, double that of others, we have used up the most troops attacking, we completely destroyed a faction that had more members than us in the first couple weeks of Strategus and we have had the vast majority of "Real Big Battles" so far.

I really don't care about people shittalking us for any other reason because hey thats funny and part of the game, but atleast be honest, we have so far contributed the most to actual battles out of any faction in NA, and I will attempt to keep doing that. The "merging" with Occitan is for my own personal sanity so I don't have to be around to do every single roster check and pester people to get mercs or do it myself, we pretty shamefully lost a 1200vs200 battle because I wasn't there to do the hiring until the last few minutes and no one else bothered to attempt to get people beforehand, but I don't want to have to schedule my time around Strategus battles. I really like everyone in LCO and we have pretty much the same views, so this is an obvious way for me to continue trying to provide fun battles for myself and my friends and not burn out on having to do everything like that myself or have it not be done.

I'm sorry I/we can't be as spergy as you about Strategus Kesh, truly.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: HardRice on March 23, 2014, 05:11:39 am
GFORCE have had the most battles in NA so far, double that of others,
Wrong.

If you count all of the WoN faction battles in we've had 32 battle,s you have had 29.
Even if you only count Black Company's battles we've had 21, not too far from your count.
Astralis has had 17 battles, they've also used almost as many troops as you, the only reason you're ahead of them in that respect is the lost battle yesterday.

Is your ego so in need of petting that you disregard everyone but yourself?
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: imisshotmail on March 23, 2014, 05:13:45 am
Wrong.

If you count all of the WoN faction battles in we've had 32 battle,s you have had 29.
Even if you only count Black Company's battles we've had 21, not too far from your count.
Astralis has had 17 battles, they've also used almost as many troops as you, the only reason you're ahead of them in that respect is the lost battle yesterday.

Is your ego so in need of petting that you disregard everyone but yourself?

Shitty peasant battles don't count.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: HardRice on March 23, 2014, 05:20:14 am
Shitty peasant battles don't count.

In about 20 of your battles your death count has been less than 100. Not because yall are fucking good, but because you outgeared and outnumbered the other faction.
Title: GFORCE MAFia Battles
Post by: GiuseppeBlackRose on March 23, 2014, 05:39:34 am
In about 20 of your battles your death count has been less than 100. Not because yall are fucking good, but because you outgeared and outnumbered the other faction.

And in other battles we have Lost a significant portion of our troops. See: Our last battle. Look at your battles, a bunch of them are Naked peasants vs scythes. Thats fun right? No
 Just like in life, Quality is more inportant than Quantity in the end, Either way. We have both.

Maybe u have some good battles? Good on u. Keep it up. I Encourage eveeryone to play to their best. Lets game guys,  :wink: :wink:
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: HardRice on March 23, 2014, 05:50:08 am
And in other battles we have Lost a significant portion of our troops. See: Our last battle. Look at your battles, a bunch of them are Naked peasants vs scythes. Thats fun right? No
 Just like in life, Quality is more inportant than Quantity in the end, Either way. We have both.

Maybe u have some good battles? Good on u. Keep it up. I Encourage eveeryone to play to their best. Lets game guys,  :wink: :wink:
I'm not talking about quantity.
We've had good battles, you've had good battles, we've had shitty ones and so have you.
That's fine, but don't go around claiming you've had more battles than everyone, because that's not true. Don't claim all of ours are "shity peasant battles" with only peasants and scythes and that yours are great because that's just a bunch of shit, dude.
Title: Gameing 2014
Post by: GiuseppeBlackRose on March 23, 2014, 05:52:51 am
I'm not talking about quantity.
We've had good battles, you've had good battles, we've had shitty ones and so have you.
That's fine, but don't go around claiming you've had more battles than everyone, because that's not true. Don't claim all of ours are "shity peasant battles" with only peasants and scythes and that yours are great because that's just a bunch of shit, dude.

we HAVE had more wars and Honest battles than everyone else. We have sieged more fiefs. To say otherwise is a dishonestyt to your self. Have we had PEasant battles? In the Beginning yes. But we evolve Adapt and Learn.
Title: Re: You spelled gaming wrong btw
Post by: HardRice on March 23, 2014, 06:00:38 am
we HAVE had more wars and Honest battles than everyone else. We have sieged more fiefs. To say otherwise is a dishonestyt to your self. Have we had PEasant battles? In the Beginning yes. But we evolve Adapt and Learn.
You've had one fucking war against Hospies and maybe you can count Super Friends. You jumping random shittily armed traders for DRZ does NOT count as a war.
You can't simply adapt and learn yourself to not have peasant gear, unlike you we don't suck DRZ's big fat Russian cock for safe trade lanes and can't equip every single trading army with full gear.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Keshian on March 23, 2014, 06:04:03 am
So let me get this straight - you lose one peasant fight because one member of your 30+ man faction isnt around to hire mercs (never mind that murder and others are also capable of this), so you want to merge with someone that will "handle" your roster for you (meanwhile you are already one of the largest factions on the map).  So instead of merging with a small active faction for roster help, you merge with the other biggest faction on the map who is already allied with FILDGB and others. Of course, makes perfect sense - you are just trying to make more battles for the community by making half the map into one clan (while being allied with the largest faction in EU as well) - you are so smart ilovehotmail and obviously care about helping keep the community alive.  You and arowaine fully deserve each other.  Two selfish, stupids peas in a pod.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Dach on March 23, 2014, 08:45:54 am
Na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, Batman!
Na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, Batman!
Batman, Batman, KESH!


This doesn't work anymore.... it only remind me of this...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wDbejJ1A00 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wDbejJ1A00)
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on March 23, 2014, 09:08:19 am
jesus keshian you are rude
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: imisshotmail on March 23, 2014, 10:49:52 am
So instead of merging with a small active faction for roster help, you merge with the other biggest faction on the map who is already allied with FILDGB and others.

We didn't merge with MB tho?
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: kinngrimm on March 23, 2014, 12:31:42 pm
Shitty peasant battles don't count.
:rolleyes:

I sofar on EU side have had not so many battles as either of the named factions here, that mostly because i still try to get good gear together, so i can offer my friends something. Then again, some of the peasent fights i was in had been hillariously funny. I quite enjoyed at the start that not so much good gear was around, now already on EU map the UIF is out producing and out teching everyone else in huge proportions, where also the 2 biggest factions plus another 1-2 are working together. Sounds familiar?

isn't it great to have friends at the boarder? (http://strategus.c-rpg.net/?switchview=EU)

We didn't merge with MB tho?
who is MB again? damn NA, fuck me if i would be able to keep track of your factions and clans. So MB you dont merge with, does that mean they are your enemies or ... soon to be wiped enemies? Are they as big as superfriends? Then you can again really be proud of your accomplishments i guess, same as the UIF on EU map, they also can be really fucking proud of their accomplishments with owning more then half of the map and having more then half of the active player base and out producing and out teching everything else. I guess within 1-3 months you wont have any enemies anymore as the remaining NA are as devided as the remaining EU with a bunch of smaller sized or new clans who will never be able to keep up with the economical capabilites. GG

NA community always had been the strongest enemy of the EU clans carebear system and i loved that so many different smaller factions had been able to hold their ground on NA map. Now you face the same problem we have in EU, a huge alliance within NA and them also cooperating with the huge alliance on EU, so you either set a side differences or this will be over before you notice what is happening.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: kinngrimm on March 23, 2014, 01:07:53 pm
sry double post, got a little exited here  :oops:
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Smoothrich on March 23, 2014, 03:29:24 pm
:rolleyes:
NA community always had been the strongest enemy of the EU clans carebear system and i loved that so many different smaller factions had been able to hold their ground on NA map. Now you face the same problem we have in EU, a huge alliance within NA and them also cooperating with the huge alliance on EU, so you either set a side differences or this will be over before you notice what is happening.

Pretty sure factions I've been in and my usually similar network of allies have been the ones going against massive nerdstacks of megaalliances on NA who receive direct unlimited Strategus funding from the Coalition Megaempires that until this strat have dominated the border of EU and NA, making even the most distant of trade partnerships with non Coalition Hegemony clans impossible.

Basically, kinngrimm, the only thing you are right is you have no idea who anyone, or what anything, in NA Strategus is. In fact, from your posting, you usually seem to have no idea what is going on in EU strat either. You also never even seem to be enjoying yourself and do nothing but flaccidly complain about the "metastate of the community" as if you are any better than a common bottom of the barrel basement dwelling middle aged autist.

Shame on you for being the kind of shallow-minded bigot that ruins the reputation of EU for everyone else.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Jack1 on March 23, 2014, 04:28:17 pm
in all honesty its pretty shit that you guys had to merge with LCO. I mean really? REAAAAALLLLLYYYYY?

no offence Arrowaine, bonsai and CO. but it is pretty hypocritical from last strat.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: HardRice on March 23, 2014, 04:45:02 pm
Arowaine and Kesh are actually pretty damn similar in their thoughts.

Arowaine screamed last strat that pretty much all his enemies and anyone associated with FCC were their "vassals" even with no truth to the fact.

Kesh shitposted this strat about how FIDLGB, LCO, GFORCE and anyone associated with them are allied. He just so happened to be right about GFORCE and LCO.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: kinngrimm on March 23, 2014, 05:21:44 pm
Pretty sure factions I've been in and my usually similar network of allies have been the ones going against massive nerdstacks of megaalliances on NA who receive direct unlimited Strategus funding from the Coalition Megaempires that until this strat have dominated the border of EU and NA, making even the most distant of trade partnerships with non Coalition Hegemony clans impossible.
Differance is, i am not Coa, never was and ahd my fair share of problems with those in the eastern block of EU last round, but as you so knoledable about EU i guess you know all about that.
Differance as well is, i did not intend nor tried to close the southern border for certaub NA clans, but GForce tries to clsoe it for none-UIF clans. I am willing to make trade with everybody on NA, while GForce wants to regulate it.

Basically, kinngrimm, the only thing you are right is you have no idea who anyone, or what anything, in NA Strategus is. In fact, from your posting, you usually seem to have no idea what is going on in EU strat either. You also never even seem to be enjoying yourself and do nothing but flaccidly complain about the "metastate of the community" as if you are any better than a common bottom of the barrel basement dwelling middle aged autist.
Shame on you for being the kind of shallow-minded bigot that ruins the reputation of EU for everyone else.
are you sure you are not describing yourself here? Smoothrich i offered trade to you and several Hero party members last round, the answers i got were around "too much effort and not worth our time" or a "general dislike" was expressed
As so often Smoothrich, you are full shit.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: arowaine on March 23, 2014, 06:06:36 pm
im gay
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Gmnotutoo on March 23, 2014, 06:49:28 pm
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: MURDERTRON on March 23, 2014, 07:27:16 pm
Kesh, honestly, if you didn't always nerd herd to get people to sign against us, we wouldn't be forced to do shit like this.  I mean, I had a long day at work on Friday and when I got home, I was exhausted.  So, being tired and not wanting to strain my internet friendships any further, I didn't do the normal begging to get my friends to sign up for a 200 man battle.  Unfortunately, we lost the battle because of it.  But it is actually your behavior that forces clans to take this approach.  The weather is getting warmer outside, and I'm going to be at my computer even less and less.  So, while you are in your basement wearing your tinfoil getting people to sign up for every 100 man naked Hospitaller army or some EU traders that you invited into NA, or whoever it is you are supporting while still accusing everyone else of running Mega Alliances, I'm going to get my ass back in the gym again and get in a lot more beach time this year.  Now, I don't know if you orchestrated the defense for the battle we lost or not, but I don't have the energy or the time to always be on my toes, worrying about stealth rosters.  So hopefully, some of the L's, C's and O's will pick up the slack with the rosters, and I can just show up on cold and rainy days.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: StonedSteel on March 23, 2014, 08:15:30 pm
Kesh, honestly, if you didn't always nerd herd to get people to sign against us, we wouldn't be forced to do shit like this.  I mean, I had a long day at work on Friday and when I got home, I was exhausted.  So, being tired and not wanting to strain my internet friendships any further, I didn't do the normal begging to get my friends to sign up for a 200 man battle.  Unfortunately, we lost the battle because of it.  But it is actually your behavior that forces clans to take this approach.  The weather is getting warmer outside, and I'm going to be at my computer even less and less.  So, while you are in your basement wearing your tinfoil getting people to sign up for every 100 man naked Hospitaller army or some EU traders that you invited into NA, or whoever it is you are supporting while still accusing everyone else of running Mega Alliances, I'm going to get my ass back in the gym again and get in a lot more beach time this year.  Now, I don't know if you orchestrated the defense for the battle we lost or not, but I don't have the energy or the time to always be on my toes, worrying about stealth rosters.  So hopefully, some of the L's, C's and O's will pick up the slack with the rosters, and I can just show up on cold and rainy days.

dont like war \ arnt up for...play something else ffs

i laugh everytime i see an anti kesh post, jealous that you arnt half the fucking commander \ leader. its a game, yeah, you have work, yeah...dont we all. quit being so fucking jealous that you cant measure up.

and btw...im fucking sick of these "elite" clans that everytime they win its cuz their enemies were no skilled plebs...and everytime you lose, its cuz ur enemies are no life nerds?

get fucking real and man up ffs
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on March 23, 2014, 08:40:25 pm
I think the perception that people are "jealous [they] arnt (sic) half the fucking commander / leader" is a flawed thought. People want to play this game without having to worry about every little unfun detail. There are a lot of gaps in this game where stupid things that make no sense are allowed to happen--like 200 troops beating 1000 because someone got a lot of people to show up to a battle that is no fun in the first place. The devs will never fix all these problems, so sometimes there is the hope that maybe other players will be decent and not do stuff like that... but the way the community is set up (because of people like Kesh), that is not possible.

Nobody reads or hears about cRPG from a friend or forum and wants to come to it because they heard about losing weeks of work creating armies because they had a 5 AM night time abuse battle that got flooded by EUs that Kesh hired, or because they didn't want to have to bring 30 people to an absolutely no fun 1500 v 100 peasant fight.

That's not superior leadership/commanding. It's really not. I've played video games that truly take leadership and commanding in different forms, and I think this is much different. Leadership to me shouldn't constitute things like what I wrote about in this post, it should be about inspiring people you play with to play better, teaching them how to, and organizing them in combat... but gathering 30 nerds and having them sign up for a battle the other team hardly wants to play in? That just doesn't feel superior to me in anyway. It feels inferior.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Goretooth on March 23, 2014, 10:11:16 pm
see you are so buthurt about some stupid game stuff you make me laugth really, see your huge number in fact are fiction in your head as for the occi we are curently 15 player the game enough to do strat stuff/chev has about 8+7 troop grinder and gforce are actually really small as far as i am concern to be honest acre and only acre still bigger then us/mb are still bigger then us on paper also fidlgb are not longer a strat faction they are (keyboard warrior) mb faction now so get your stuff straigth if i am killing the community so then i am sorry i just learn from my last opponent to get as many people on board to have full roster and ensure to have fun in this game.

the na map is first way to large for the number of people playing it there also way to many clan and larger clan always get more action on the map and this is according to you see fcc strat 4/ve strat 4 bring a lot of action im just trying to make the game as fun as they did.
So you became someone that you hate on a video game.  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Wesleysnipes on March 23, 2014, 11:00:13 pm
Why is everyone complaining?? This is fucking awesome! GFORCE and Occitan can start taxing every small faction for protection. But I'm not gonna pay taxs!
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Aztek on March 23, 2014, 11:03:32 pm
My greatest disappointment with any strat thus far, was a clan I respected the most joining with a clan I respected the least.

I get the appeal with troll clans, some just like that type of thing to fuel their ego's and what not. But when you see stuff like this, its the equivalent of watching your parents who you thought were mature, sniffing paint and eating glue with the neighborhood drunk.

I still have a ton of respect for a lot of the people in LCO, but this really does make me shake my head...  :? 
   
 
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Keshian on March 23, 2014, 11:36:20 pm
Are only a few of us seeing this?  They merged the two largest factions because one battle you and hotmail (is that badplayer or internet explorer - i forget which or if they are the same guy) couldn't make your own battle that you chose to initiate  before NA primetime as attackers.

1)  You didn't even need to recruit mercs - you just needed to hire the mercs that applied (which no one did for the entire day) - poor leadership - what we used to do in fcc is we would ask around the ts and see who would make a fight and then if they could we would ask them to hire mercs and anyone and everyone could hire throughout the day and would often do so (i'm sorry Giuseppe and marcus are too stupid that they need to be hand-held, but if you led a less autocratic clan you wouldn't have this problem - hence poor leadership)

2) You share a ts with half of the na playerbase who only ever merc for each other and never fight each other (exception 2 days ago aow joined - don't count, they are our spies ;) jk) - all it takes is one person from gforce who is making the battle to ask in the same ts they are having the battle in - no one bothered - again poor leadership often caused by over-controlling rather than encouraging initiative

3)  I didn't even recruit for that battle, I just showed up and astralis already had things well under control and were hiring anyone who applied and were willing to show up in greater numbers than the bigger gforce faction at that time slot even though gforce CHOSE the time slot by attacking then (poor coordination/timing = poor leadership - I think you just assumed you would win)

Accusing me of needing to merge two giant factions together (im part of a 7-man faction and play very little this round) is frankly ludicrous and pretty pitiful excuse.  Grow a pair already, its just a game - losing pixels not a big deal.

P.S.  To be fair yours and arowaine's style of leadership fits perfectly the mold of being the vassals of EU Druzhina - both druzhina and grey order run their clans with a huge amount of autocracy and with the eastern european mentality that seems to work - just surprised 'Mericans and canadians would submit so easily to such a form of clan control without wanting more independence and self-will.  Maybe you are all secret soviet spies and not true 'Mericans!!!
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on March 23, 2014, 11:52:03 pm
Are only a few of us seeing this?  They merged the two largest factions because one battle you and hotmail (is that badplayer or internet explorer - i forget which or if they are the same guy) couldn't make your own battle that you chose to initiate  before NA primetime as attackers.

1)  You didn't even need to recruit mercs - you just needed to hire the mercs that applied (which no one did for the entire day) - poor leadership - what we used to do in fcc is we would ask around the ts and see who would make a fight and then if they could we would ask them to hire mercs and anyone and everyone could hire throughout the day and would often do so (i'm sorry Giuseppe and marcus are too stupid that they need to be hand-held, but if you led a less autocratic clan you wouldn't have this problem - hence poor leadership)

2) You share a ts with half of the na playerbase who only ever merc for each other and never fight each other (exception 2 days ago aow joined - don't count, they are our spies ;) jk) - all it takes is one person from gforce who is making the battle to ask in the same ts they are having the battle in - no one bothered - again poor leadership often caused by over-controlling rather than encouraging initiative

3)  I didn't even recruit for that battle, I just showed up and astralis already had things well under control and were hiring anyone who applied and were willing to show up in greater numbers than the bigger gforce faction at that time slot even though gforce CHOSE the time slot by attacking then (poor coordination/timing = poor leadership - I think you just assumed you would win)

Accusing me of needing to merge two giant factions together (im part of a 7-man faction and play very little this round) is frankly ludicrous and pretty pitiful excuse.  Grow a pair already, its just a game - losing pixels not a big deal.

P.S.  To be fair yours and arowaine's style of leadership fits perfectly the mold of being the vassals of EU Druzhina - both druzhina and grey order run their clans with a huge amount of autocracy and with the eastern european mentality that seems to work - just surprised 'Mericans and canadians would submit so easily to such a form of clan control without wanting more independence and self-will.  Maybe you are all secret soviet spies and not true 'Mericans!!!

lol
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: imisshotmail on March 24, 2014, 12:03:52 am

how are we the "two biggest NA factions" when combined we still have less members than Acre?
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Working_Class on March 24, 2014, 12:08:30 am
how are we the "two biggest NA factions" when combined we still have less members than Acre?
Acre sux thats why
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: HappyPhantom on March 24, 2014, 12:12:22 am
My greatest disappointment with any strat thus far, was a clan I respected the most joining with a clan I respected the least.

I get the appeal with troll clans, some just like that type of thing to fuel their ego's and what not. But when you see stuff like this, its the equivalent of watching your parents who you thought were mature, sniffing paint and eating glue with the neighborhood drunk.

I still have a ton of respect for a lot of the people in LCO, but this really does make me shake my head...  :? 
 

I feel essentially the same way.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Artyem on March 24, 2014, 12:21:45 am
What if the Squids and Nerds of the North work together?  That's like 52 members, throw that in with Acre's and you have 100+ players.

Sounds like an interesting war.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Working_Class on March 24, 2014, 12:27:44 am
What if the Squids and Nerds of the North work together?  That's like 52 members, throw that in with Acre's and you have 100+ players.

Sounds like an interesting war.
Acre would probably side with lco tbh
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Rikthor on March 24, 2014, 12:51:17 am
Acre would probably side with lco tbh

Doubtful considering the previous GForce posts labeling Acre as part of the bad clans they want to take on at some point. Personally, I welcome it, hopefully it means more actual battles between even armies rather than this garbage of geared armies against peasant battles.

Also, certain posters need to step back and look at what they have done in Strat so far before complaining about LCO/Gforce merging.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on March 24, 2014, 03:28:02 am
What if the Squids and Nerds of the North work together?  That's like 52 members, throw that in with Acre's and you have 100+ players.

Sounds like an interesting war.

They are working together right now; to try and shit on Frisia. Check the battles list m8.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Wesleysnipes on March 24, 2014, 04:02:53 am
I wont say too much because most people take the forums to heart. But I guess it was okay for Astralis and Frisia to team up on Black Company right?
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on March 24, 2014, 04:09:25 am
We really only helped Astralis because they were getting shit on quite hard. I'd say now you're attacking us while we are the ones getting shit on. Iunno. I've been kind of AFK from being Daruvian for awhile and haven't really done anything on Strat... but I think we didn't really outnumber black company nearly as much as you + wardens outnumber us.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Wesleysnipes on March 24, 2014, 04:11:31 am
Didn't Astralis start it? Then Black Company prevailed and did better. Leading Frisia to jump in? Oh well.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on March 24, 2014, 04:17:29 am
i mean, i started reading books and stuff instead of playing strat and shittalking people so i have been out of the loop

EDIT: sandy has updated/warned me he is working on a spergpost to address the issue
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Wesleysnipes on March 24, 2014, 04:22:44 am
Okay cool
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on March 24, 2014, 04:29:03 am
The public sperg announcement can be located here:

http://forum.melee.org/diplomacy/wom-astralis-war-the-grandmaster's-narrow-escape-from-the-astralis-barbarians/msg977503/#msg977503
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Stabb on March 24, 2014, 04:40:05 am
We really only helped Astralis because they were getting shit on quite hard. I'd say now you're attacking us while we are the ones getting shit on. Iunno. I've been kind of AFK from being Daruvian for awhile and haven't really done anything on Strat... but I think we didn't really outnumber black company nearly as much as you + wardens outnumber us.

Well we gave both of your factions the option to just leave the north. You didn't have to jump in at all you could've just gave them a pat on the back and told them to go south. I don't know if we would have even attacked you if you were not the aggressor. Sorry but you dun fucked up and entered on the wrong side <3
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on March 24, 2014, 04:48:17 am
eh i'd rather side with astralis than you guys, i like them more so i'd say they're the side i want to be on. i don't care who the winners are in that respect.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Artyem on March 24, 2014, 06:47:37 am
eh i'd rather side with astralis than you guys, i like them more so i'd say they're the side i want to be on. i don't care who the winners are in that respect.

lol but black company isn't ego driven, nothing but kind hearted good souls looking to make strategus a better place.

Not like those Astralis nerds, gosh those guys raise my blood pressure.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Uumdi on March 24, 2014, 07:23:21 am
1. beat head
2.fuck

3 idont even play crpg anymore why do i read

54. mdnuggers
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Mae. on March 24, 2014, 03:47:04 pm
1. beat head
2.fuck

3 idont even play crpg anymore why do i read

54. mdnuggers
HE HATH SPOKEN
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: TR_Ragnarok on March 24, 2014, 07:45:27 pm
lol but black company isn't ego driven, nothing but kind hearted good souls looking to make strategus a better place.

Not like those Astralis nerdsDrunk Try-Hards, gosh those guys raise my blood pressure.

Corrected your statement.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: LastKaze on March 24, 2014, 09:51:42 pm
Let's be honest here, Strategus sucks.

#ModIsDead
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on March 25, 2014, 09:32:11 pm
GFORCE have had the most battles in NA so far, double that of others, we have used up the most troops attacking, we completely destroyed a faction that had more members than us in the first couple weeks of Strategus and we have had the vast majority of "Real Big Battles" so far.

I really don't care about people shittalking us for any other reason because hey thats funny and part of the game, but atleast be honest, we have so far contributed the most to actual battles out of any faction in NA, and I will attempt to keep doing that. The "merging" with Occitan is for my own personal sanity so I don't have to be around to do every single roster check and pester people to get mercs or do it myself, we pretty shamefully lost a 1200vs200 battle because I wasn't there to do the hiring until the last few minutes and no one else bothered to attempt to get people beforehand, but I don't want to have to schedule my time around Strategus battles. I really like everyone in LCO and we have pretty much the same views, so this is an obvious way for me to continue trying to provide fun battles for myself and my friends and not burn out on having to do everything like that myself or have it not be done.

I'm sorry I/we can't be as spergy as you about Strategus Kesh, truly.

Yes all those attacks on 100 man inactive player armies were great for the strat community, and fun fought battles indeed.   Whatever helps you sleep at night buddy.

Shitty peasant battles don't count.

And then I read this.. So you just nullified your own previous statement...
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: MURDERTRON on March 26, 2014, 01:10:19 am
Yes all those attacks on 100 man inactive player armies were great for the strat community, and fun fought battles indeed.   Whatever helps you sleep at night buddy.

And then I read this.. So you just nullified your own previous statement...

Huseby, you generally have to do something better than someone else in order to talk shit about it.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on March 26, 2014, 02:26:59 am
Huseby, you generally have to do something better than someone else in order to talk shit about it.

Not at all true, I suck at something and then talk shit frequently.

If you lose badly, you've got to have fun somehow. Talking shit is a great way to do that!
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Aztek on March 26, 2014, 02:36:09 am
Huseby, you generally have to do something better than someone else in order to talk shit about it.

You mean like pointing out a hypocritical statement and twisted tale of grand battles eliminating a faction that never really fought back?
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: MURDERTRON on March 26, 2014, 03:17:11 am
We still have the largest amount of large battles as well, so you're really just splitting hairs at this point to lessen the blow of being the first clan wiped this Strat.  We were in a war, and had to attack your traders.  It's not our fault your traders only had 100-200 troops and were unarmed.  If you see where the argument started, you can see you're just chasing your own tail here.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: HappyPhantom on March 26, 2014, 03:23:56 am
Isn't all you need to talk shit, a mouth (and/or fingers).
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on March 26, 2014, 05:28:21 am
Isn't all you need to talk shit, a mouth (and/or fingers).

You could type shit if you were really desperate using only your nose, toes, or tongue.

But yeah, usually.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: HarryCrumb on March 26, 2014, 07:24:34 am
You could type shit if you were really desperate using only your nose, toes, or tongue.

But yeah, usually.

or an erect wiener. <==3
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: xOps on March 26, 2014, 09:30:48 am
Dear Murder and imisshotmail,

I think you lost your ballz somewhere back there... cause you were acting like you were manly men, now you're moaning and groaning like mere boys...HE JUST AH BOI.  Now it's time for some quotes that you guys posted before when you were going all big dick.........

Murdertron: Gforce is a serious banner. Joe , soon yuo will kiss the ring s
Murdertron: You're tangoing with the wrong people here.  You don't know what you've got yourself in to.
Murdertron: Hospitallers, are you ready to kiss the rings?

imisshotmail: I don't know man, i'm having a lot of fun wrecking all the shit clans and players that I dislike so far. It's pretty funny actually, all those people seem to be the ones who aren't liking Strategus too? makes you think...
imisshotmail: Most people aren't Mafia material then...
imisshotmail: You complain when people aren't fighting, you complain when people are fighting, are you schizophrenic as well as autistic? It's not my problem Hospitaller are a shit clan who even with more players than GFORCE had considerably less gold to outfit their armies, they got owned deal with it.
imisshotmail: Hospitaller, Fallen and FCC? bring in HoC and Acre and we can have a BAD CLAN PARTY


AND MY VERY PERSONAL FAVORITE QUOTE GOES TO imisshotmail.......

imisshotmail: Please, more shit players and clans out yourself as liking Hospitaller so I can note it down. GFORCE will be purging the Strategus community of scrubs one clan at a time.



I was kind enough to leave all your guys' typos in...not that I'm judging on your grammar, because honestly I don't really give a sh...

So yeah, you talk the big game, until what--you realized you were dealing with real manly men on the opposing side? Calculated boyz...calculated. You guys handle yourselves like true 13YRO BOIS.


Cheers,

X

Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: MURDERTRON on March 26, 2014, 03:16:37 pm
Com e at me. bro
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: KaMiKaZe_JoE on March 26, 2014, 03:49:55 pm
Ur bad more like badforce. Joe said.

Ha now u can't warn me filthy mod scum it's RP, see, not spam.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Keshian on March 27, 2014, 02:02:48 am
We still have the largest amount of large battles as well, so you're really just splitting hairs at this point to lessen the blow of being the first clan wiped this Strat.  We were in a war, and had to attack your traders.  It's not our fault your traders only had 100-200 troops and were unarmed.  If you see where the argument started, you can see you're just chasing your own tail here.

Just want to make small correction - most of those battles were not traders but people you kicked out of fiefs after you took them.  Basically the most afk members of hospitallers with no strat ticks or gear.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: MURDERTRON on March 27, 2014, 02:38:41 am
Just want to make small correction - most of those battles were not traders but people you kicked out of fiefs after you took them.  Basically the most afk members of hospitallers with no strat ticks or gear.

No, that's not true at all.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Keshian on March 27, 2014, 02:44:28 am
No, that's not true at all.

Lol, somebody's getting defensive.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on March 27, 2014, 03:09:02 am
rofl you guys are arguing about peasant battles on the forums for several days at at time
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Keshian on March 27, 2014, 04:19:58 am
rofl you guys are arguing about peasant battles on the forums for several days at at time

I know isn't it hilarious how dull strat becomes when giant factions merge and ally with half of eu and na.  Forum drama alone becomes near obsolete - have to sit around and talk about the good old days of actual fighting.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Lt_Anders on March 27, 2014, 10:43:27 pm
I know isn't it hilarious how dull strat becomes when giant factions merge and ally with half of eu and na.  Forum drama alone becomes near obsolete - have to sit around and talk about the good old days of actual fighting.

On another note: how the fuck did kesh surpass my upvotes. I had like 20 more than him.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Artyem on March 28, 2014, 04:48:21 am
Kesh may have been partially correct on his theory, I think he was wrong on the factions involved though.

(click to show/hide)

I mean, honestly, what are the chances of any of these factions going to war with each other?  I consider myself somewhat friendly with members from each one, so I don't mean to offend anybody, but this just happened to catch my eye earlier.

anyway, back to nerding away at my diplomacy map
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Keshian on March 28, 2014, 04:55:18 am
On another note: how the fuck did kesh surpass my upvotes. I had like 20 more than him.

I have no fucking clue - I didn't even think that was one of my better rants.  :shock: :oops: :rolleyes:  I still think the if murder, arowaine, james, and whoever leads keyboard warriors wanted to they could bring strat back to life in NA as the 4 largest clans around duking it out and stopping easy ai castle and city captures (admittedly 3 of those 4 share a ts and are allied so it may be asking a lot).

Only 50 or so more votes and I get to join the gentleman's club.  My mom always said I would grow up to achieve something great!  :wink:

P.S.  Arty -
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Artyem on March 28, 2014, 05:04:05 am
Last I checked KbW and GFORCE don't exactly have great relations, but I could be wrong, I know about as much about their diplomacy as you do.

(click to show/hide)

Certainly WoM* and Black Company sharing a faction now has nothing to do with them being allies  :wink:
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Keshian on March 28, 2014, 05:08:09 am
Last I checked KbW and Occitan have great relations and Gforce merged with occitan, but I could be wrong, I know about as much about their diplomacy as I do about women other than my mother.  jack shit.


Corrected.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Artyem on March 28, 2014, 05:14:39 am
hello i am a nerd

I don't know jack shit about strat?  GFORCE isn't merged with Occitan anymore bro, and Acre alone has more members than Occitan and GFORCE combined.

Didn't AoW and Acre share a teamspeak for the longest time?  Does that naturally make them allies?
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Lt_Anders on March 28, 2014, 05:14:52 am
Funny thing, Most of those factions in Arytem's post were Freindly and or Allied/part of FCC last strat?

Coincidence?! I think not!

Personally, I think that AI villages actually ruined this strat far more than any blocks will. By making it so BORING at the start, most factions can't care to do shit. Why wage war when it'll take at least 3 months just to get any SEMBLANCE of an economy etc? 1/3 of this round is spent just getting started.

Last round, within 2 weeks most factions were capable of fighting limited to moderate engagements.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Uumdi on March 28, 2014, 05:16:05 am
"8=====D this big" uumdi said, puffing on a dong cigar dong dong.
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on March 28, 2014, 06:48:06 am
I have no fucking clue - I didn't even think that was one of my better rants.  :shock: :oops: :rolleyes:  I still think the if murder, arowaine, james, and whoever leads keyboard warriors wanted to they could bring strat back to life in NA as the 4 largest clans around duking it out and stopping easy ai castle and city captures (admittedly 3 of those 4 share a ts and are allied so it may be asking a lot).

Only 50 or so more votes and I get to join the gentleman's club.  My mom always said I would grow up to achieve something great!  :wink:

P.S.  Arty -
(click to show/hide)

I'm replying to your spoiler. I searched the archive for both "ward of mithrim" and "black company" and there were no battles fought between them. Unless by saying they were "duking it out" you meant in diplomacy on teamspeak. There is one battle that shows up as fighting Sjeferak_Blackcompany, but that is only because they were taking new jelbegi when it was neutral, and that guy is the current fief owner.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: FCC #2?
Post by: HardRice on March 28, 2014, 02:59:27 pm
I'm replying to your spoiler. I searched the archive for both "ward of mithrim" and "black company" and there were no battles fought between them. Unless by saying they were "duking it out" you meant in diplomacy on teamspeak. There is one battle that shows up as fighting Sjeferak_Blackcompany, but that is only because they were taking new jelbegi when it was neutral, and that guy is the current fief owner.

(click to show/hide)

We weren't duking it out but we were pretty fucking close. Bffs now though.
I've made the mistake of assuming I know about every faction's relations by looking at them on the map and that never works out.