Why do Power Strike do only 8% damage more?
Look.
Somebody do every stats in strength (like me :D), in power draw it's look like 30lvl-13lvlpower draw 13*14=182%damage more.
Long bow-33 +8 tatar arrows = 41
41 *182% =41 +41 +33 =115 damage
Nobody with 13 power strike and with weapon like persian battle axe don't do damage like this
then bow do more damage than sword?
Look normal arrow don't kill
But if arrow hit in the chestplate then don't kill too.
I just want to tell you it's don't normal.
And not fair because before warrior go to archer he shoot him 2-3/4-5 times.
With that stats and that damage we crush the best shield in 5-6 times
Warrior always must do more damage.
PS: Please add piercing.
I'm thinking about hitting few men in one attack, because
then it's better for fighting and it's like that in normal life.
1 hit-5 deads
As a STR crutcher %99 of my death reason is trying to spam an agiwhore and fail.
As a STR crutcher %99 of my death reason is trying to spam an agiwhore and fail.
(click to show/hide)
TL;DR:
If you are skilled infantry,you should use AGI based builds because it is far more superior to STR . STR builds are very good at forgiving mistakes but you make those mistakes because you lack speed for most of the time. As a STR crutcher %99 of my death reason is trying to spam an agiwhore and fail.
That must mean you do never die actually? Because spamming others with a str build is more than fail... Especially if you know the enemy has lots of agi...I never mentioned that Im a smart man .
Laughing at this so much here. You just said you are mad because you can't just spam people and win ? Really ?I never said Im mad neither .
Why do Power Strike do only 8% damage more?
Look.
Somebody do every stats in strength (like me :D), in power draw it's look like 30lvl-13lvlpower draw 13*14=182%damage more.
Long bow-33 +8 tatar arrows = 41
41 *182% =41 +41 +33 =115 damage
Nobody with 13 power strike and with weapon like persian battle axe don't do damage like this
then bow do more damage than sword?
Look normal arrow don't kill
But if arrow hit in the chestplate then don't kill too.
I just want to tell you it's don't normal.
And not fair because before warrior go to archer he shoot him 2-3/4-5 times.
With that stats and that damage we crush the best shield in 5-6 times
Warrior always must do more damage.
PS: Please add piercing.
I'm thinking about hitting few men in one attack, because
then it's better for fighting and it's like that in normal life.
1 hit-5 deads
Why do Power Strike do only 8% damage more?
Look.
Somebody do every stats in strength (like me :D), in power draw it's look like 30lvl-13lvlpower draw 13*14=182%damage more.
Long bow-33 +8 tatar arrows = 41
41 *182% =41 +41 +33 =115 damage
Nobody with 13 power strike and with weapon like persian battle axe don't do damage like this
then bow do more damage than sword?
Look normal arrow don't kill
But if arrow hit in the chestplate then don't kill too.
I just want to tell you it's don't normal.
And not fair because before warrior go to archer he shoot him 2-3/4-5 times.
With that stats and that damage we crush the best shield in 5-6 times
Warrior always must do more damage.
PS: Please add piercing.
I'm thinking about hitting few men in one attack, because
then it's better for fighting and it's like that in normal life.
1 hit-5 deads
I never mentioned that Im a smart man . I never said Im mad neither .
Had to give you a + for this post! :DYeap I agree everything yet Miwiw, you miss the point I am not blaming game mechanics or agiwhores for my fail :D I already know it's my fault trying to spam with 18 AGI .(It would be far more retarded if i could spam +3 Great Bardiche with 8 PS ;) )
Anyway, I do of course agree with you, that the latest patch buffed agi builds a lot. If we say that an agi build is 21 agi+ while being on 15 str or less, and str builds are the other way round, the agi builds probably have far more advantages. Even with low ps, you could pick a weapon that deals extra damage to high armor rating and with 4 or 5 PS you will still deal a lot of damage plus you can do many hits anyway if you're able to out spam the heavy str guy.
I rather play str builds myself, I was 24-15 as 2hand for ages, but that was before the patch happened. During that time I played a 21-18 shielder and wasn't satisfied with my speed compared to other players.
Now I'm on a 18-21 pole (21-21 to be) because I simply would never go below 18 str but now at least 18 agi are needed for enough wpf imo.
Str certainly needs some buff (see "raise str requirement for heavy armors" topic in Suggestions).
However I quoted you for that part where you said that you die 99% of the times you spam someone, don't think that's weird at all with your heavy str build. Spam only works if you got a spammy build and weapon. And not even every time then. :)
Warband's combat system actually doesn't really support spam, at least not if your enemy knows how to play.
My conclusion for current situation is , agi builds are far more superior to str builds now.Ok, I'm not really good at game mechanics theoretising, what I have however is two facts.
If you disagree , please tell me why without hating and posting bullshit ?