cRPG

cRPG => Ban/Unban Requests => EU (Official) => Topic started by: no_rules_just_play on February 01, 2014, 11:09:44 pm

Title: [Ban] 3ZfVW
Post by: no_rules_just_play on February 01, 2014, 11:09:44 pm
1. no_rules_just_play_HRE
2. 3ZfVW
3. eu2 just now
4. 722 was opening the gate as attacker and this guy comes running in and takes position on the mechanism with his shield up, I had to get behind him so he turned around and 722 and ego could attack him which was impossible otherwise.
6.
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
7. Ego_HRE and 72206_HRE
Title: Re: [Ban] 3ZfVW
Post by: Matze on February 01, 2014, 11:26:12 pm
He was mad. And i dont see the diffent between staying on a ladder or on this think both has the same effect. I also dont see in the server rules that a defender can to it. We should ban no rule just play hre for intentionla tk after raund end on the eu 1
Title: Re: [Ban] 3ZfVW
Post by: 722_ on February 02, 2014, 08:29:23 pm
yeah,I was about to open the gate and he jumped on top and just stood there with shield up, out of kick range
Title: Re: [Ban] 3ZfVW
Post by: Matze on February 02, 2014, 08:57:12 pm
I wasnt out of rang from kick i just move so the kicks dont work. Stop qq hre and deal with it that someone is better then you. When you really like to kill me you would can jump on it to and fight, but wait you dont think on it. Your brain was working like oh fuck a grey beginn qq the world is shit. dont like to say that ever hre is like this.
Title: Re: [Ban] 3ZfVW
Post by: Varadin on February 02, 2014, 09:13:43 pm
plz cry more
Title: Re: [Ban] 3ZfVW
Post by: Matze on February 02, 2014, 09:15:29 pm
And i dont understand your logic. A defender defend his castel against the attacker. You think the defender should run out of the map hre can take the castel?
Title: Re: [Ban] 3ZfVW
Post by: no_rules_just_play on February 02, 2014, 10:11:40 pm
you abuse the game by standing on the gate mechanism, it blocks the opening of the gate and we can't reach you because you have a fucking shield how hard is it to understand?
Title: Re: [Ban] 3ZfVW
Post by: Franke on February 03, 2014, 02:47:07 pm
As far as I understand, blocking the gate mechanism by standing on it is regarded as griefing. IIRC there have been cases in the past where this has been punished. A thorough examination by a responsible admin will lead to the correct judgement here, I have no doubt.

The accusing side posted his screenshots in order to emphasize his claim and the accused posted his version of the story.

No need to put more drama in here and attract trolls/forum heroes as already happened.
Title: Re: [Ban] 3ZfVW
Post by: karasu on February 04, 2014, 04:07:16 pm
This isn't something explicit in the rules and people still fail to read the most important part of them which is:

Quote
If your common sense is not working, here are some more specific guidelines. This is not an explicit list, common sense always overrides disputes. Do not come crying "it's not prohibited in the rules" if you invent a new creative way to be an idiot and get punished.

If we can go literally by the line:
Quote
NOT OK: Using a bug to gain undeserved benefits



Thing is, this isn't something recurrent (Fips already raised some of the maps gate mechanisms to avoid such things)  and we rarely someone using this "trick" to gain an unfair advantage.
Also, as op stated:
Quote
4. 722 was opening the gate as attacker and this guy comes running in and takes position on the mechanism with his shield up, I had to get behind him so he turned around and 722 and ego could attack him which was impossible otherwise.
meaning not much harm was done since he was the only one there and you easily adapted to control the situation.  (if there were copycats it could've gotten ugly).

Therefore, I leave a warning on Nuuks_Slave_the_Grey (3ZfVW).


(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [Ban] 3ZfVW
Post by: no_rules_just_play on February 04, 2014, 04:21:02 pm
actually we had to fight of atleast one other guy too, but I'm pretty sure there were 3 of them including nuuk.

But I'm fine with a warning.