cRPG

Strategus => Strategus General Discussion => Topic started by: MURDERTRON on December 18, 2013, 06:40:04 am

Title: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: MURDERTRON on December 18, 2013, 06:40:04 am
Astralis:
AFK leaders, yet refuses to select new Strat leaders.  Always cried that the surrounding Hospitallers would rape them into the ground if they ever did anything that went slightly against them.   Didn't do shit all strat.
Grade: F

The Central Confederacy/Funbutler
Attacked FCC and then gave up.  Fought Acre, then stopped fighting Acre, then fought Acre again.  Also fought FCC again, and gave up again.
Grade: D

Free Companies of Calradia
Terrible diplomacy, but very active faction.  Probably took the most castle and cities.  But seriously, terrible diplomacy.  You know who I'm talking about.
Grade: B+

Free Peasants of Fisdnar
Got raped by Jesus, then attacked some crap in EU that no one cares about.
Grade: C-

KUTT
Got wiped due to massive stupidity within a weeks time.  Also didn't show up to a lot of their own fights.
Grade: D

Lost Legion
Poured tons of CRPG gold into being an annoying mosquito against FCC.  Also got their troops capped multiple times.
Grade: D-

Hospitaller
Somehow they won Strat 3 and then turned into one of the most inept factions.  Never backed up any of their allies and generally did jack shit.  Somehow they were also always poor.
Grade: D

Chaos
Never did shit, only held on to their last fief because its impossible to take.
Grade: D-

Warriors of the First Age
Bought a lot of fiefs, just to lose them right before Strat died.
Grade: D

Sovereign Kingdom of Third RL
Bought a lot of fiefs, only to lose a lot of them and teamwound ALL THE TIME.
Grade: D

The Kingdom of Veluca
Consistently fought to stalemates, yet talked so much shit on the forums.
Grade: C-

Les Chevaliers Occitans
Consistently fought to stalemates, yet made so many threats.  Mostly depended on fear for diplomacy.  Also took a bunch of fiefs from HOC retard babies.
Grade: C+

Fuck It Dude Let's Go Bowling
Multi-accounting scum, did nothing for a long time and then got wiped.
Grade: D

THE REALM OF THE GOBBLIN KING
Completely dupe bug/other developer oversight fueled faction, yet still managed to lose some battles.  Then complained about 40~ hour work weeks.  Still did a good amount of attacks during the time they existed.
Grade: B-

Hounds of Chulainn
Bad mercs, including a guy who would just hang out in battles with his shield up with 1000 points and 1-30 score.  Were pretty diligent about strat clicking, and then went full retard.
Grade: D-

Remnants
Schizophrenic strat faction with possible bipolar disorder.  Almost won a battle with only cudgels.
Grade: C-

Murder Boner
Lost a lot of troops to upkeep.  Stalemated and gave up, multiple times.  Had out dated gear patch-wise near the end of strat
Grade:  D

Anders
Weak Chin
Grade: F

Gmnotutoo's Kawaii Desu Desu Ninja Schoolgirl Death Squad Something Something
WHAT?
Grade: S

BIRD CLAN
B is for Bird
Grade: B

Who am I missing?
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Zlisch_The_Butcher on December 18, 2013, 06:42:28 am
WPB is missing and is deeply offended and hurt.
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: MURDERTRON on December 18, 2013, 06:50:40 am
You existed for 3 days, pointlessly raided and empty village, then attacked it.  Also I feel like you're using Artyem's developer oversight money to fund everything, but I can't prove it.  Now, your only real battles have only happened since the deadline was announced.
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Zlisch_The_Butcher on December 18, 2013, 06:57:43 am
You existed for 3 days, pointlessly raided and empty village, then attacked it.  Also I feel like you're using Artyem's developer oversight money to fund everything, but I can't prove it.  Now, your only real battles have only happened since the deadline was announced.
I take that as an A+
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: WITCHCRAFT on December 18, 2013, 07:01:35 am
What about no (autistic) child left behind? You are ruining Calradia's school systems...
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Lord_Bernie_of_Voodoo on December 18, 2013, 07:07:34 am
I'm going to have to start taking screenies of HoC mercs consistently topping scoreboards
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Smoothrich on December 18, 2013, 07:10:45 am
I'm going to have to start taking screenies of HoC mercs consistently topping scoreboards

lmao
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on December 18, 2013, 07:10:49 am
It should be noted that the only armies equipped with gear that was the result of bugs were the attacks on New Almerra Castle. All the other ones were gold from Semen Storm and Malgalad trading. So like 90% of my battles were using the economy system, not gear bugs.

Also, I call bias. FCC deserves a lower grade because:

A.) Keshian
B.) Months of stalemate because they camped their castles with the most troops NA.
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: MURDERTRON on December 18, 2013, 07:18:45 am
It should be noted that the only armies equipped with gear that was the result of bugs were the attacks on New Almerra Castle. All the other ones were gold from Semen Storm and Malgalad trading. So like 90% of my battles were using the economy system, not gear bugs.

Also, I call bias. FCC deserves a lower grade because:

A.) Keshian
B.) Months of stalemate because they camped their castles with the most troops NA.

Artyem windfalling 400 million silver is actually worse than the bugs, if you think about it.  I'm not saying he's at fault, but you and me both know what happened and where you got your money.

As far as FCC goes, their period of stalemate is still much better than everyone else' periods of complete inactivity.
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on December 18, 2013, 07:21:05 am
No but for real the only duped armies I ever had were the ones that attacked Almerra. The others were with fair gold.
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Nightingale on December 18, 2013, 09:56:03 am
KUTT
Got wiped due to massive stupidity within a weeks time.  Also didn't show up to a lot of their own fights.
Grade: D

I guess that happens when FCC, Remnant, and Fallen, Teutonics, and Dracul team up against a faction in early strat. Not saying KUTT couldn't have done better, but given the circumstances I think we did pretty well.

Free Peasants of Fisdnar
Got raped by Jesus, then attacked some crap in EU that no one cares about.
Grade: C-

I care!!!

Chaos
Never did shit, only held on to their last fief because its impossible to take.
Grade: D-

No one in chaos really cared for strat much you can't force people to come together and play something they don't necessarily want any part of... Canary attempted and only had help from like 1-3 people at most. I guess on the brighter side we passed? sorta.

You missed me on your grading scale, I deserve my own spot obviously! Not really but worth a shot I guess.
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Bronto on December 18, 2013, 01:01:54 pm
You are such an asshole dude. The bans happened at the beginning of strat. You even helped us at that time because you thought it was unfair of us to get banned. Remember that? Or did I just ruin your street cred? Furthermore we were accused of account sharing (got unbanned because we didnt know we broke any rules and gained absolutely nothing from it go reread the global ban section) and if you'd paid attention we did our fair share of banditing this round. Also, we gave you a channel in our TS that we had to take away because you weren't even mature enough to handle that. Are you holding a grudge over what exactly? Get over it and find something else you can accuse us of. Your post of report cards, a poor attempt at humor, isn't going to make you many friends next round.
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Kirbyy on December 18, 2013, 01:53:16 pm
Oh! Oh! Malta! We were there with 1 fief like a year ago, got wiped by TKoV and hounds of chulainn, then wiped out by Frisia, then we came back with a 2 man faction and got two fiefs in one week.  A++
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Jack1 on December 18, 2013, 02:23:59 pm
It's hard to point out were any of that isn't bias.
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: HardRice on December 18, 2013, 05:31:36 pm
Fpf deserves a better grade.

CC actually did stuff, deserve at least a C

You used duped gear as well, btw. Please stop fucking whining about the gobbs.

Kutt put up a damn good fight, give them a B

Fuck off with bashing fidlgb, they did do shit, even came back from being wiped.

Hosperglers I can't comment on.

FCC I can't comment on either, as I am in it and therefore biased.

LCO fucking scary, at least a B.

The rest I cannot comment on or forget about. Regardless, this is one of the most biased posts ever.

Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Relit on December 18, 2013, 05:37:40 pm
Fimbulvetr/CC's first war versus FCC... nobody gave up. FCC did not want to fight the war at all. Dracul stayed out of the war entirely and Raven launched over 8 attacks on various villages/armies-in-field. Frisia moved a little slow but did some attacks too. The war just sort of went cold then a peace agreement was reached.

Then Raven-Dracul Alliance attacked Acre's castle 6 times, (and a village twice), before a peace agreement was done. There was no second war that I am aware of...

I think your misrepresenting multiple factions contributions in this strat.
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: MURDERTRON on December 18, 2013, 07:07:46 pm
Fpf deserves a better grade.

CC actually did stuff, deserve at least a C

You used duped gear as well, btw. Please stop fucking whining about the gobbs.

Kutt put up a damn good fight, give them a B

Fuck off with bashing fidlgb, they did do shit, even came back from being wiped.

Hosperglers I can't comment on.

FCC I can't comment on either, as I am in it and therefore biased.

LCO fucking scary, at least a B.

The rest I cannot comment on or forget about. Regardless, this is one of the most biased posts ever.

Kutt did not show up to 1k v 400 strat battles, because they'd assuredly lose thar battle, but damage could still be done.  400 troops meant a lot more in those days too.  Basically Kurt fought some battles but refused to fight a war.

I only used duped gear to fight myself, and kept it out of the Strategus Eco-system.  I'm not going to brag about my accomplishments with duped gear, because I only used it to create exp.

I'd consider raising occitans grade, but they were one of the earlier recipients of duped gear but they kept it a secret and used it anyway, which I'm sure affected the outcome of a bunch of battles against Tkov.
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Matey on December 18, 2013, 09:07:22 pm
So its okay for you to use duped gear as long as its for something that you say its okay to do?

Do you honestly think anyone is going to complain about Murder using duped gear to fuel xp battles for the community? Especially when he reported getting it immediately and was completely ignored by devs (as per usual)
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Artyem on December 18, 2013, 09:18:02 pm
Guys, stop taking this thread seriously.

It's MURDERTRON posting, so of course it's going to be horribly biased and overlooked.  You may as well just disregard it as a poor attempt at trolling and go back to getting mad at video games.
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on December 18, 2013, 09:57:48 pm
I'll just make my own report card with blackjack and hookers.
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: dynamike on December 18, 2013, 10:45:38 pm
Remnants
Schizophrenic strat faction with possible bipolar disorder.  Almost won a battle with only cudgels.
Grade: C-

You corrupt swine...

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Scervo on December 18, 2013, 11:59:04 pm
Wow you guys are serious. Who cares what grade he assigned your faction in his arbitrary forum report card that looks like its kinda supposed to be a joke
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Jack1 on December 19, 2013, 12:05:10 am
Fucking casual gamer.
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Matey on December 19, 2013, 12:22:52 am
Fucking casual gamer.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: MURDERTRON on December 19, 2013, 02:19:13 pm
How dare I give docile factions bad grades!  The whole point of Strategus is experience, but apparently some of you just want girly pink titles.
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Spanish on December 20, 2013, 12:50:02 am
lol ppl all butt hurt cuz some fcc scum gave them a grade
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Keshian on December 20, 2013, 04:02:52 am
lol ppl all butt hurt cuz some fcc scum gave them a grade

Hasnt been in FCC for months.  Has his own crpg and strat faction - just about a third of FCC left to help supply troops for xp battles.
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: MURDERTRON on December 20, 2013, 06:03:55 am
Hasnt been in FCC for months.  Has his own crpg and strat faction - just about a third of FCC left to help supply troops for xp battles.

Kesh was pretty butt hurt when I took all my troop farmers away from him.
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: GandalfJr on December 20, 2013, 06:09:28 am
Where the hell are the sloths?
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Deltah on December 20, 2013, 07:25:27 am
Where the hell are the sloths?

I didn't even know they existed until strat was announced to end and they attacked WFA.
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Chestaclese on December 20, 2013, 02:44:29 pm
Remnants
Schizophrenic strat faction with possible bipolar disorder.  Almost won a battle with only cudgels.
Grade: C+
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: dynamike on December 20, 2013, 03:22:14 pm
The only thing most of the clans passed is gas.
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Dutchydave on December 31, 2013, 03:30:26 am
Kutt did not show up to 1k v 400 strat battles, because they'd assuredly lose thar battle, but damage could still be done.  400 troops meant a lot more in those days too.  Basically Kurt fought some battles but refused to fight a war.

I only used duped gear to fight myself, and kept it out of the Strategus Eco-system.  I'm not going to brag about my accomplishments with duped gear, because I only used it to create exp.

I'd consider raising occitans grade, but they were one of the earlier recipients of duped gear but they kept it a secret and used it anyway, which I'm sure affected the outcome of a bunch of battles against Tkov.

I beg to differ on you only using duped gear to fight your self, you used your duped gear to threaten LL and myself.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/837/w4zd.png/
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on December 31, 2013, 03:59:02 am
dutchy why
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: MURDERTRON on January 02, 2014, 12:20:28 am
I beg to differ on you only using duped gear to fight your self, you used your duped gear to threaten LL and myself.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/837/w4zd.png/

Actually I borrowed gear from FCC to fight you.
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on January 02, 2014, 07:43:59 am
murdertron why
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Lemon on January 02, 2014, 07:51:29 am
dutchy why
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Aldogalus on January 04, 2014, 08:41:02 am
bias and heresy bias and heresy.

Not that I'd expect anything more from murdertron.

We did puss hard in strat 4 though, part of which I can attribute to having the odds stacked against us, for the majority of our independence from VE. With HoC(kind of small and questionably active), WFA(kind of small and questionably active), and VE (pretty big, apparently not active enough) all against us, I guess we felt kind of justified turtling. In hindsight, should have burned up some more of those troops. Never again will we puss that hard.

Here's a bonus SS i took. Just sharing it for lulz
(click to show/hide)

Maybe i should get my faction members, members of friendly factions, and some MB alumni  to get on here and shout out some numbers that fluctuate drastically. That's what you guys did, and it sure made your story more credible.
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Canuck on January 04, 2014, 09:20:57 am
Nobody wins on forums
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on January 04, 2014, 11:02:23 am
aldo
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Thalion_Menelvagor on January 17, 2014, 04:35:44 pm
Hummm....

Murdertron, I'm not going to argue about our "grade" but I still think you missed our  out on some critical points in your summary of our activities.  Like the point that our tiny faction fought against factions much bigger than ourselves for the majority of our existence in strat. We continued to fight the Gobblin King when no one else had the balls to do so because of all his shiny gear-bugged armies and we made a good effort defending our castle against CC. Then at the end, we shotgunned our 12k troops we had saved up for our counter-offensive to retake the fiefs we had lost because strat was ending. If I had known that the point of strat ending was to to try and defend your fiefs (as if strat wasn't ending) then we'd just have hung out. As for starting a new faction over halfway through strat when most of the map was dominated by large factions I am fairly happy with what we were able to accomplish through both diplomacy and warfare.

As such, we will be pulling all WFA children from your school and homeschooling them forthwith.  :wink:

- Thalion
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: okiN on January 17, 2014, 07:49:35 pm
Dear burgers, this is for you since I know you like this sort of thing.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on January 17, 2014, 09:20:59 pm
Hummm....

Murdertron, I'm not going to argue about our "grade" but I still think you missed our  out on some critical points in your summary of our activities.  Like the point that our tiny faction fought against factions much bigger than ourselves for the majority of our existence in strat. We continued to fight the Gobblin King when no one else had the balls to do so because of all his shiny gear-bugged armies and we made a good effort defending our castle against CC. Then at the end, we shotgunned our 12k troops we had saved up for our counter-offensive to retake the fiefs we had lost because strat was ending. If I had known that the point of strat ending was to to try and defend your fiefs (as if strat wasn't ending) then we'd just have hung out. As for starting a new faction over halfway through strat when most of the map was dominated by large factions I am fairly happy with what we were able to accomplish through both diplomacy and warfare.

As such, we will be pulling all WFA children from your school and homeschooling them forthwith.  :wink:

- Thalion

hey shitrock only like two of my armies that went into battle actually used duped gear/gold, stop forgetting that
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Thalion_Menelvagor on January 18, 2014, 12:19:45 am
hey shitrock only like two of my armies that went into battle actually used duped gear/gold, stop forgetting that

First I've heard of that and if so, then good on you and yours. Although... it didn't really change the fact all your guys were monsters running around in full Milanese plate.  Still some good battles though.

Secondly,  i have been eating a lot of flax seed lately, and I am definitely not a "shitrock". A shit-slushy would be more accurate.

- Thalion
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on January 18, 2014, 01:17:10 am
why is this happening
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Keshian on January 19, 2014, 11:32:20 pm
I still think Werfried's Peasant Battalion should be looked at again for our "300"-style defense of Uhhun.

http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=6063

It was pretty epic.
Title: Re: NA STRATEGUS 4 REPORT CARDS
Post by: Mae. on January 20, 2014, 03:19:41 pm
Remnants
Schizophrenic strat faction with possible bipolar disorder.  Almost won a battle with only cudgels.
Grade: C-

accurate... but i believe the cudgel thing deserves a better grade